Role of surface charge and oxidative stress in cytotoxicity of organic monolayer-coated silicon nanoparticles towards macrophage NR8383 cells
© Bhattacharjee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 2 February 2010
Accepted: 11 September 2010
Published: 11 September 2010
Surface charge and oxidative stress are often hypothesized to be important factors in cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. However, the role of these factors is not well understood. Hence, the aim of this study was to systematically investigate the role of surface charge, oxidative stress and possible involvement of mitochondria in the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon exposure of rat macrophage NR8383 cells to silicon nanoparticles. For this aim highly monodisperse (size 1.6 ± 0.2 nm) and well-characterized Si core nanoparticles (Si NP) were used with a surface charge that depends on the specific covalently bound organic monolayers: positively charged Si NP-NH2, neutral Si NP-N3 and negatively charged Si NP-COOH.
Positively charged Si NP-NH2 proved to be more cytotoxic in terms of reducing mitochondrial metabolic activity and effects on phagocytosis than neutral Si NP-N3, while negatively charged Si NP-COOH showed very little or no cytotoxicity. Si NP-NH2 produced the highest level of intracellular ROS, followed by Si NP-N3 and Si NP-COOH; the latter did not induce any intracellular ROS production. A similar trend in ROS production was observed in incubations with an isolated mitochondrial fraction from rat liver tissue in the presence of Si NP. Finally, vitamin E and vitamin C induced protection against the cytotoxicity of the Si NP-NH2 and Si NP-N3, corroborating the role of oxidative stress in the mechanism underlying the cytotoxicity of these Si NP.
Surface charge of Si-core nanoparticles plays an important role in determining their cytotoxicity. Production of intracellular ROS, with probable involvement of mitochondria, is an important mechanism for this cytotoxicity.
Silicon (Si) is conventionally regarded as a non-toxic semiconductor material and Si NP are proposed as an alternative for the highly toxic heavy metal quantum dots in biological applications such as in food industry and bioimaging . However, once exposed to an aerobic atmosphere, Si NP readily get oxidized to silica (silicon dioxide; SiO2) , which is reported to result in cytotoxicity . The cytotoxicity of silica nanoparticles has been reported to be size dependent . Data on the actual toxicity of silicon NP (Si NP) are, however, scarce.
Recently, we developed a method for the gram-scale synthesis of Si NP , which can be coated with a covalently bound organic monolayer with different surface charges [6–8]. These nanoparticles have a silicon core of 1.6 ± 0.2 nm as determined by TEM [7, 8]. By attaching alkyl chains to the surface of the Si core with amine (NH2), azide (N3) and carboxylic acid (COOH) terminal moieties, Si NP with respectively positive (Si NP-NH2), neutral (Si NP-N3) and negative (Si NP-COOH) surface charges can be obtained. This coating prevents the oxidation of Si NP to SiO2. Also the influence of surface charges on the cytotoxicity remains largely unresolved, although there are several research articles pointing at a possible role of surface charge in cellular uptake and/or cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Oskuee et al., for example, reported a decrease in cytotoxicity with decreasing positive surface charge of polyethyleneimine NP-s. Sayin et al. found that positively charged N-trimethyl chitosan NP-s were more cytotoxic than their negatively charged counterparts.
Brief overview of recent publications pointing at a possible role of surface charge in interaction of nanoparticles with cells
Size of nanoparticle (nm)
Cell Line tested (in vitro/in vivo)
Ruizendaal et al. (2009) 
Si NP with amine (+), azide (neutral) and acid (-) surface functionalization
1.6 ± 0.2
Positively charged Si NP-NH2 more cytotoxic than neutral Si NP-N3. Negatively charged Si NP-COOH did not show toxicity.
Geys et al. (2009) 
Quantum dots (amine terminated, neutral, carboxylate terminated)
Primary alveolar epithelial cells
MTT, TEER, sodium fluorescein leakage, confocal microscopy
Surface charge did not show any influence on translocation through the cell line.
Corsi et al. (2009) 
Iron based magnetic nanoparticles
7 ± 3
MCF7 carcinoma cells
Anionic nanoparticles were spontaneously internalized. Cationic ones were taken up by clathrin receptor mediated endocytosis.
Sadiq et al. (2009) 
Interaction between positively charged particles and bacteria was found
Xu et al. (2009) 
Hemoglobin loaded polymeric NPs
(MPM) cell line from SD mice
MTT, in vivo biodistribution and clearance of NPs
No influence of surface charge on cytotoxicity was observed.
Nafee et al. (2009) 
Chitosan modified PLGA
between 150 and 250
COS-1, A549, Calu-3
MTT, LDH, ATP, TEER, SFM
Higher zeta potential was connected with lower toxicity for COS-1, while no effect of surface charge was found for A549 cells.
Pathak et al. (2009) 
Branched polyethylenimine with chondroitin sulphate
between 80 and 190
MTT, DNA release, protein adsorption, confocal microscopy, gene transfection, radiolabelling, biodistribution, scintigraphy
Reduction in positive charge by increasing the percentage of chondroitin sulphate decreases cytotoxicity.
Mayer et al. (2009) 
26, 34, 62, 160, and 220
Flow cytometry for thrombocyte and granulocyte activation, plasma coagulation assay, light microscopy, membrane integrity assay, C3a and C5a ELISA, hemolysis
Positive surface charge led to complement activation.
Zhang et al. (2009) 
Amine, PEG and carboxylic acid terminated CdSe quantum dots with ZnS shell
TEM, quantification of quantum dot fluorescence, immunostaining
Uptake of amine-terminated quantum dots proceeds by caveolin/clathrin pathway, while that of carboxylic acid terminated ones proceed by GPCR pathway
Nam et al. (2009) 
Glycol chitosan with 5β cholanic acid
Cellular uptake studies
Increase in positive charge results in enhanced uptake and distribution by clathrin, caveolin receptor mediated, macropinocytosis.
Gupta et al. (2009) 
Polyacrylic acid and YFa
83 ± 8
HepG2, N2a, HEK293
MTT, RBC, WBC, platelet count from blood samples, in vitro peptide release study
Positively charged particles do not have any toxic behaviour.
Kim et al. (2008) 
Quantum dot nanocomposites
104.5 ± 7.8
Scanning electron microscopy, TIRF, cell viability
Cationic coating at basic pH, makes the NPs more biocompatible.
Hauck et al. (2008) 
Gold nanorods with polyelectrolyte surface coating
TEM, Trypan Blue exclusion, gene expression
Only CTAB (positively charged) coated particles were toxic in absence of FCS.
Orr et al. (2007) 
C10 (alveolar type II epithelial cell line)
X-ray diffraction, TEM, DIC, SEM
Positively charged particles can reach the cells through filopodia and microvilli-like structures. Positive surface charge and intact actin filaments are essential for retrograde movement of the particles.
Previously, we reported the synthesis and cytotoxic effects of differently charged Si NP towards human colonic adenocarcinoma derived Caco-2 cells . Positively charged Si NP-NH2 exerted the highest toxicity, whereas the negatively charged Si NP-COOH were hardly toxic and the neutral Si NP-N3 showed intermediate toxicity towards the Caco-2 cells. Unfortunately, investigations regarding the mechanisms of cytotoxicity of nanoparticles are quite limited. Also, different research groups use different experimental models. Nevertheless, oxidative stress is proposed as one of the most important mechanisms for NP mediated toxicity [24–33]. In these studies a wide range of nanoparticles was tested in different cellular models. Still, a concerted study on the effect of surface charge on the production of intracellular ROS and subsequent oxidative stress and cytotoxicity is not available. Therefore, in the present study we systematically investigated the role of NP surface charge and oxidative stress in the rat alveolar macrophage NR8383 cell line. This cell line provides an adequate model system for studying the effect of NP on phagocytic cells, which can clarify possible effects on the innate immune response. In the current study the mechanism underlying the differential cytotoxicity of the various Si NP is investigated, with a focus on the possible role for the formation of intracellular ROS and oxidative stress. To this end the production of intracellular ROS in both Caco-2 and NR8383 cells exposed to increasing concentrations of the differently charged Si NP was investigated. Also the degree of protection provided by pre-incubation of the cells with the antioxidants vitamin E and vitamin C and the possible role of Si NP-induced mitochondrial activity in the production of the intracellular ROS was studied. The results indicate how the surface charge of the NP influences their capability to induce intracellular ROS formation and oxidative stress and point at a role of mitochondria in this NP-induced ROS production at the subcellular level.
The EC50 values of different Si NP obtained from experiments reported in this article
Mitochondrial metabolic activity
Intracellular ROS production
Figure 3A (NR8383)
Figure 3B (Caco-2)
ROS production (from isolated mitochondrial fraction)
MTT (in presence of antioxidants vitamin E and
Mitochondrial metabolic activity
Figure 5 (for Vitamin E)
Figure 5 (for Vitamin C)
In figure 3B the intracellular ROS production (measured by DCFH-DA assay) in Caco-2 cells after 24 hours exposure to various Si NP is shown. Upon exposure to Si NP-NH2 intracellular ROS production started at low concentrations and then grew rapidly reaching a plateau at concentrations above 46 ng/ml (EC50 value = 18 ng/ml; Table 2). For Caco-2 cells exposed to Si NP-N3, intracellular ROS production increased significantly at concentrations above 50 ng/ml and increased up to higher concentrations (EC50 value = 310 ng/ml; Table 2). For Caco-2 cells exposed to Si NP-COOH, no increase in intracellular ROS production was observed.
The effects of vitamins E and C on the cytotoxic effects of Si NP-N3 in NR8383 cells are shown in figure 5B. For cells exposed to Si NP-N3, vitamin C offered a significant protection, whereas preincubation of the cells with vitamin E did not result in protection against the cytotoxicity of the NP. The corresponding EC50 values for Si NP-N3 were 270 ng/ml, 310 ng/ml and 510 ng/ml (p < 0.05), respectively, for NR8383 cells not preincubated with antioxidants (control), cells preincubated with 100 μM vitamin E, and cells preincubated with 1 mM vitamin C.
The surface charge of nanoparticles plays an important role in their interaction with cells and cytotoxicity. In this paper the role of surface charge on cytotoxicity is studied and mechanistic factors (like oxidative stress) causing this cytotoxicity are probed. The main conclusions are that positively charged Si NP-NH2 are more cytotoxic towards NR8383 cells both in terms of reducing mitochondrial metabolic activity and phagocytosis than neutral Si NP-N3, while negatively charged Si NP-COOH showed very little or no cytotoxicity. Si NP-NH2 produced most intracellular ROS followed by Si NP-N3, with no ROS produced by Si NP-COOH. Part of this ROS production probably originates from mitochondria, as a similar trend in ROS production was observed in NR8383 cells and in incubations of isolated rat liver mitochondrial fractions with Si NP. The Si NP-NH2 and Si NP-COOH are slightly more hydrophilic than Si NP-N3. However, since the difference in cytotoxicity and ROS production is much larger between Si NP-NH2 and Si NP-COOH than between Si NP-NH2 or Si NP-COOH and Si NP-N3 we conclude that surface charge is much more important than differences in hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity.
The role of ROS was also reflected in the protection against cytotoxicity by Si NP upon pretreatment of the NR8383 cells with vitamins E and C. Interestingly, pretreatment of the NR8383 cells with vitamin E showed more protection towards Si NP-NH2 than vitamin C, while vitamin C showed more protection towards Si NP-N3. The mechanism behind this difference may be related to the nature of the ROS formed and/or the location(s) and mechanism(s) of this ROS formation, although the results of the present study reveal that in both cases mitochondrial ROS production is likely involved. Pan et al. previously reported different protective effects offered by different antioxidants (N-acetylcysteine, glutathione, triphenylphosphine monosulphonate and vitamin C) while studying the cytotoxic effects of gold nanoparticles on HeLa cells.
The relatively higher cytotoxicity of Si NP-NH2 as compared to Si NP-N3 or Si NP-COOH is in agreement with our previous study, where similar effects of these Si NP were observed on human colonic adenocarcinoma-derived Caco-2 cells . Shiohara et al. recently reported the synthesis and cytotoxicity of Si NP with different functionalized surfaces containing amine, epoxide, diene and diol terminated alkyl chains. These authors also reported a higher toxicity of amine-terminated Si NP as compared to the other Si NP. However, the functional groups of their Si NP were mostly different from our Si NP. Also, their Si NP were substantially larger (~4 nm in size), more polydisperse and prepared by a different synthetic technique. Goodman et al. tested the cytotoxicity of cationic and anionic monolayer-coated gold nanoparticles on Cos-1 cells and found that cationic particles were toxic, whereas the anionic particles were not toxic at all, which matches our observation as well. Table 1 presents an overview of additional literature studies on nanoparticles, showing the role of surface charge on cellular interaction, including cellular uptake and cytotoxicity. It seems that the findings reported in these studies can be summarized to an overall match to our results since mostly positive charged nanoparticles are cytotoxic, although the cytological and experimental models used and endpoints studied in these reported studies are quite different from the ones we applied.
Our data also showed that positively charged Si NP-NH2 and the neutral Si NP-N3 decreased the phagocytic activity in NR8383 cells, but surprisingly reveal that the negatively charged Si NP-COOH increased the phagocytic index significantly. Although the precise mechanism of this phenomenon is not fully understood (see below), several indications have been reported in the literature that suggest that this is in fact not an unexpected phenomenon. One study reported comparable results for etoposide-incorporated tripalmitin nanoparticles with positive and negative surface charges . That study showed that in rats, after 24 hours of intravenous administration, the concentration of positively charged particles in blood was 1.64 times that of negatively charged ones. Sengupta et al. showed that etoposide-incorporated cationic liposomes attain a longer half-life in blood than anionic liposomes containing etoposide, due to a decreased phagocytic activity of macrophages for cationic particles that is not seen in the case of anionic particles. A similar charge-dependent increase (for negatively charged liposomes) or decrease (for positively charged liposomes) of phagocytosis of liposomes containing stearylamine was reported by Levchenko et al.. Comparable results were reported by Aoki et al. while investigating the disposition kinetics of liposomes with encapsulated methyl-2-amino-6-palmitoyl-D-glycoside. They found that the surface charge of liposomes is an important factor for phagocytosis of liposomes by the reticule-endothelial system: positively charged liposomes decreased phagocytosis, while negatively charged ones did not affect phagocytosis. It should be noted that all studies quoted above [37–40] were bioavailability studies and only potentially non-toxic nanoparticles were tested irrespective of their surface charge. Furthermore, in most of these studies no proper cytotoxicity tests were performed simultaneously with the bioavailability experiments.
As the Si NP-COOH proved to exert very little or no cytotoxicity at the tested concentrations, the induction of phagocytosis by negatively charged Si NP-COOH may be compared with similar findings reported in the above-mentioned studies. However, these findings should not be compared with our results on positively charged Si NP-NH2 which are cytotoxic within the tested concentration range. Hence, the decrease in phagocytic capability of NR8383 cells after exposure to positively charged Si NP-NH2 is the result of the positive surface charge and NP cytotoxicity but does not reflect an absence or induction in cellular uptake. A possible explanation for the induction of phagocytosis by negatively charged nanoparticles is given by Hernandez-Caselles et al., who reported better binding of opsonin serum proteins with negatively charged nanoparticles than with positively charged nanoparticles. As a result, negatively charged nanoparticles get more covered with opsonin proteins, which stimulates phagocytosis by macrophages. It should be noted that the cell culture medium F12-K used in our experiments had fetal calf serum, which contained opsonin proteins (like immunoglobulins) in it as well.
In order to get more insight in the mechanism behind the cytotoxicity of Si NP towards NR8383 and Caco-2 cells we assessed the production of intracellular ROS. From our results it is evident that positively charged Si NP-NH2 were more efficient in producing intracellular ROS than the neutral Si NP-N3, which produced ROS only at much higher concentrations, and than negatively charged Si NP-COOH that did not produce any intracellular ROS at all. Xia et al. did an extensive study on murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells with a broad range of nanoparticles (including metal oxides like titanium dioxide, fullerols, carbon black and amine terminated polystyrene nanoparticles/PS-NH2) and found that only carbon black and cationic PS-NH2 were able to generate intracellular ROS production. ROS production by cationic PS-NH2 is in line with our study where Si NP-NH2 were also able to induce production of intracellular ROS. Stone et al. also mentioned oxidative stress as an important mechanism for cytological injury caused by nanoparticles. Previously, Foucaud et al. showed that carbon black ultrafine particles are capable of producing ROS in biologically relevant medium (like cell culture medium). Additionally, there are several other reports in which oxidative stress has been identified as an important mechanism for cytotoxicity of nanoparticles [45–47].
Subsequently, we investigated the capability of mitochondria to act as a source for nanoparticle-induced ROS production, since mitochondria have previously been recognized as a probable subcellular target of nanoparticles . The results of our study reveal that mitochondria might indeed interact and contribute to the intracellular ROS production induced by NP. Karataş et al. also reported that the mitochondrial membrane may be a target for NP interaction. They used an isolated mitochondrial fraction from A549 lung cancer cells incubated with negatively charged 13 nm gold nanoparticles, and studied the interaction with surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Using AFM and TEM they also demonstrated interaction of the gold nanoparticles with the mitochondrial membrane. There is one more report  in which 1.4 nm and 15 nm gold nanoparticles were tested on HeLa cells. The 1.4 nm gold nanoparticles were coated with triphenylphosphine sulphonate groups and their cytotoxic effect on the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ) was compared with bigger 15 nm gold nanoparticles. However, that study focused more on the size effect of gold nanoparticles on the mitochondrial membrane potential, and did not report the effect of surface charge of nanoparticles in interaction of the NP with the mitochondrial membrane. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first one to show production of ROS directly from mitochondria when exposed to NP. The observation that incubation of the mitochondrial fraction with positively charged Si NP-NH2 produced more ROS than incubation with neutral Si NP-N3 and negatively charged Si NP-COOH is in agreement with findings reported by Xia et al.. With electron microscopy they saw that positively charged NH2-PS nanospheres completely disrupted the morphology of mitochondria after 16 hours of exposure, while negatively charged COOH-PS nanospheres did not cause any harm to the mitochondria. They also reported a dissipation in mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ) with NH2-PS but not for COOH-PS nanospheres. These data suggest that the interaction of cationic NP with mitochondrial membranes exerts significant toxic effects.
The present study demonstrates the importance of surface charge in the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Dose-dependent and charge-dependent production of intracellular ROS further emphasizes the role of oxidative stress as an important mechanism for cytotoxicity. Mitochondria are likely target organelles for nanoparticles in the production of intracellular ROS. The negative Si NP-COOH show potential for further biological applications, whilst positive Si NP-NH2 should be applied with care.
Si NP-NH2 and Si NP-N3 were prepared and characterized by methods described by Rosso-Vasic et al. and Si NP-COOH were prepared by the method described by Ruizendaal et al.. All three NP were of comparable sizes with a mean core diameter of 1.6 ± 0.2 nm as determined by TEM [7, 8] and all three Si NP are modified by about 25 surface groups . Both Si NP-NH2 and Si NP-COOH were dissolved in ultrapure sterile water, while the stock solution of Si NP-N3 was dissolved in pure DMSO. The required final concentration ranges of all three Si NP were prepared by serial dilution with medium and amounted to 0.1 - 370 ng/ml for the Si NP-NH2; 0.1 - 2200 ng/ml for the Si NP-N3, and 0.1 - 3000 ng/ml for the Si NP-COOH which were the final tested concentration ranges for each of the assays described in this paper unless otherwise mentioned. No aggregation of these particles was observed with time in medium with DLS for at least 2 weeks and the solutions were vortexed at least for 1 minute before use. The solutions were filtered through 0.2 μm cellulose filters before cytotoxicity assays to maintain sterility. The amount of DMSO in the wells containing Si NP-N3 was calculated to be < 1% (v/v), at which concentration no cytotoxic effect of the DMSO was observed.
Cell Lines and tissue fractions
Rat alveolar macrophage cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). The cells were cultured in 150 cm2 cell culture flasks with 25 ml F12-K culture medium (Gibco 21127) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated FCS in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.
The human colonic adenocarcinoma cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). The cell line was cultured in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated FCS, 1% (v/v) NEAA and 0.1% (v/v) gentamicin.
Isolation of the mitochondrial fraction from rat liver tissue
A Wistar rat of body weight 200 - 250 g was sacrificed by decapitation following anesthesia with isoflurane. The liver was excised at 4°C and homogenized in ice-cold saline using a Potter homogenizer with 20 - 25 strokes. The homogenized tissue was then centrifuged at 500 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was then removed and the pellet after being weighed was resuspended in ice-cold saline and centrifuged at 10.000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was removed again and the pellet containing the isolated mitochondrial fraction was suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 3 mg pellet/ml concentration with the addition of 0.4 mM glutamate and 0.4 mM NAD+ as substrates for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. The mitochondrial fraction was then kept in an incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2 atmosphere for 4 hours to ensure start of mitochondrial respiration.
Cytotoxicity of Si NP
An NR8383 cell suspension was collected and centrifuged at 140 g for 5 minutes before resuspending the cell pellet in medium followed by counting and adjusting the cellular concentration to 2 × 105 cells/ml. The cells were then seeded in a 96-well plate (50 μl/well) and the plate was kept in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C for 24 hours. Next day 50 μl of serial dilutions of Si NP were added to the cells to obtain the required final concentrations of Si NP and then incubated for 24 hours. After 24 hours 5 μl of MTT solution in PBS (5 mg/ml) was added to each well and the plate was incubated for another 4 hours. Then 100 μl of pure DMSO was added to each well to dissolve the formazan crystals. Now the absorption of each well was measured at 562 nm in a 96-well plate reader and the background absorption at 612 nm  was subtracted. Mitochondrial metabolic activity for each concentration of Si NP was expressed as % of corresponding negative control reading. Medium without Si NP and medium with Triton-X (0.1%) were used as negative and positive controls respectively. Control experiments were done to exclude a possible reaction between MTT salt and Si NP. Additional control experiments were performed with stoichiometrically equivalent amounts of the coating materials (allylamine in case of Si NP-NH2, 10-undecenyl azide in case of Si NP-N3 and 1-butenoic acid in case of Si NP-COOH) to exclude cytotoxicity arising from the coating material molecules possibly remaining in the stock solutions of Si NPs as impurities. However, at these concentrations no cytotoxic effects were found for these compounds.
Protection by cellular preincubation with vitamin E
NR8383 cells were plated as described above (1 × 104 cells/well; 50 μl/well) in F12-K medium containing 100 μM vitamin E. After 24 hours 50 μl of serial dilutions of Si NP were added to the wells to obtain the required final concentrations of Si NP (the final concentration of vitamin E upon addition of the Si NP was reduced to 50 μM/well). Upon incubation for another 24 hours MTT reagent was added and the MTT assay was performed as described above. Control experiments were run with vitamin E only or Si NP only; both showed no activity in the MTT test.
Protection by cellular preincubation with vitamin C
NR8383 cells were plated in a 96-well plate (1 × 104 cells/well; 50 μl/well) in F12-K medium and after 22 hours vitamin C was added to reach a concentration of 1 mM vitamin C. After 2 more hours of incubation 50 μl of serial dilutions of Si NP were added to the wells to obtain the required final concentrations of Si NP (this reduced the final concentration of vitamin C to 500 μM). Upon incubation for another 24 hours MTT reagent was added and the MTT assay was performed as described above. Control experiments were run with vitamin C only or Si NP only; both showed no activity in the MTT test.
Phagocytic Index measurement
A NR8383 cell suspension (8 × 106 cells/ml) was plated in a 96-well plate (50 μl/well) in F12-K medium, followed by addition of 50 μl/well of serial dilutions of Si NP to obtain the required final concentrations of Si NP. Plain F12-K medium without Si NP and medium containing 100 μM CuSO4 were used as negative and positive control respectively. After 24 hours the cells were exposed to yellow green fluorescent latex beads (1 μm size) at a ratio of beads to cells in each well of 50:1. After 4 hours of incubation counting samples were taken from the wells and viewed first under a fluorescent microscope to visualize the fluorescent beads, followed by bright field view to visualize the cells [see additional file 1]. Also samples were taken out of each well to assess the cell viability by Trypan Blue exclusion test. The phagocytic index was determined by calculating the average number of fluorescent beads phagocytosed per viable cell and expressed as % of the negative control. Medium without Si NP served as negative control.
The cell suspension was adjusted to 2 × 105 cells/ml and seeded in a 96-well plate (50 μl/well) in F12-K medium. 50 μl/well of serial dilutions of Si NP in F12-K medium were added to obtain the required final concentrations of Si NP. A final concentration of 10 mM H2O2 was used as positive control and F12-K medium without nanoparticles as negative control. After 6 hours of exposure to the Si NP, 5 μl of a 20 mM solution of DCFH-DA were added to each well and the plates were incubated for another 18 hours in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. The fluorescence was then measured on a fluorometer at 485 nm excitation and 538 nm emission wavelengths. The fluorescence induction factor for each concentration of Si NP was calculated by dividing the reading of each well by the average reading of the negative control and expressed as %. Control experiments were performed by incubating the Si NP at their test concentrations with DCFH-DA in the absence of cells to check the possibility of a positive fluorescence reading caused by reaction with Si NP alone.
The cells were suspended in DMEM medium to a concentration of 1 × 105 cells/ml after trypisinization and were plated in a 96-well plate (100 μl/well). After 24 hours the cells were exposed to 100 μl/well of final concentrations of Si NP. Following another 6 hours of Si NP exposure, 5 μl of a 20 mM solution of DCFH-DA were added. The plate was further incubated for 18 hours before measurement of the fluorescence was carried out as described above. Control experiments were performed by incubating the Si NP at their test concentrations with DCFH-DA in the absence of cells to check the possibility of a positive fluorescence reading caused by reaction with Si NP alone.
Effect on isolated mitochondrial fraction
The isolated mitochondrial fraction (3 mg pellet/ml in PBS) was plated in a 96-well plate (50 μl/well) and serial dilutions of Si NP and 5 μl of DCFH-DA probe were added. The plate was incubated for 90 minutes at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. The plate was then measured at 485 nm excitation and 538 nm emission wavelength. Medium without Si NP and with 75 μM DNP in DMSO were used as negative and positive controls respectively. Results were expressed as % of negative control.
Data were analyzed with Origin Pro (version 8.0) graphing software. For statistical analysis a student's t-test was performed and data with P < 0.05 (compared to negative control, except for Figure 5) are marked with an asterisk (*) sign. Each data point represents the average from three independent experiments (n = 3) and is presented as the arithmetic mean ± SEM.
List of abbreviations
atomic force microscopy
American type culture collection
C5a: complement component 3 and 5
disseminated intravascular coagulation
dynamic light scattering
Dulbecco's modified eagle medium
half maximal effective concentration
enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay
electron transport chain
fetal calf serum
Ham's F12- medium with Kaighn's modification
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
G-protein coupled receptor
non-essential amino acids
nuclear magnetic resonance
phosphate buffered saline
red blood corpuscles
reactive oxygen species
rotations per minute
standard error of mean
scanning force microscopy
- Si NP:
- Si NP-COOH:
carboxylic acid terminated silicon nanoparticles
- Si NP-NH2:
amine terminated silicon nanoparticles
- Si NP-N3:
azide terminated silicon nanoparticles
trans epithelial electric resistance
transmission electron microscopy
total internal reflection fluorescence (microscopy)
white blood corpuscles
The authors would like to thank the Wageningen UR strategic research program Bionanotechnology and Graduate School VLAG for generous funding and colleagues of Wageningen University animal housing (CKP) facility for providing biotechnical assistance.
- Derfus AM, Chan WCW, Bhatia SN: Probing the cytotoxicity of semiconductor quantum dots. Nano Lett 2004, 4: 11–18. 10.1021/nl0347334View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klauser F, Stijepovic R, Endstrasser N, Jaksch S, Memmel N, Scheier P: Oxidation study of silicon nanoparticle thin films on HOPG. Surf Sci 2009, 603: 2999–3004. 10.1016/j.susc.2009.08.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park J, Gu L, Maltzahn GV, Ruoslahti E, Bhatia SN, Sailor MJ: Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications. Nat Mater 2009, 8(4):331–6. 10.1038/nmat2398PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burns AA, Vider J, Ow H, Herz E, Penate-Medina O, Baumgart M, Larson SM, Wiesner U, Bradbury M: Fluorescent silica nanoparticles with efficient urinary excretion for nanomedicine. Nano Lett 2009, 9(1):442–448. 10.1021/nl803405hView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosso-Vasic M, Sprujit E, van Lagen B, De Cola L, Zuilhof H: Alkyl-functionalized oxide-free silicon nanoparticles: synthesis and optical properties. Small 2008, 4(10):1835–1841. 10.1002/smll.200800066View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruizendaal L, Bhattacharjee S, Pournazari K, Rosso-Vasic M, de Haan LHJ, Alink GM, Marcelis ATM, Zuilhof H: Synthesis and cytotoxicity of silicon nanoparticles with covalently attached organic monolayers. Nanotoxicology 2009, 3(4):339–347. 10.3109/17435390903288896View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rosso-Vasic M, De Cola L, Zuilhof H: Efficient energy transfer between silicon nanoparticles and a Ru-polypyridine complex. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 2235–2240. 10.1021/jp804623wView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rosso-Vasic M, Spruijt E, Popovi Z, Overgaag K, van Lagen B, Grandidier B, Vanmaekelbergh D, Domínguez-Gutiérrez D, De Cola L, Zuilhof H: Amine-terminated silicon nanoparticles: synthesis, optical properties and their use in bioimaging. J Mater Chem 2009, 19: 5926–5933. 10.1039/b902671aView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oskuee RK, Dehshahri A, Shier WT, Ramezani M: Alkylcarboxylate grafting to polyethylenimine: a simple approach to producing a DNA nanocarrier with low toxicity. J Gene Med 2009, 11(10):921–932. 10.1002/jgm.1374View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sayin B, Somavarapu S, Li XW, Thanou M, Sesardic D, Alpar HO, Senel S: Mono-N-carboxymethyl chitosan (MCC) and N-trimethyl chitosan (TMC) nanoparticles for non-invasive vaccine delivery. Int J Pharm 2008, 363(1–2):139–148. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.06.029View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nafee N, Schneider M, Schaefer UF, Lehr CM: Relevance of the colloidal stability of chitosan/PLGA nanoparticles on their cytotoxicity profile. Int J Pharm 2009, 381(2):130–139. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.049View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hauck TS, Ghazani AA, Chan WC: Assessing the effect of surface chemistry on gold nanorod uptake, toxicity, and gene expression in mammalian cells. Small 2008, 4(1):153–159. 10.1002/smll.200700217View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayer A, Vadon M, Rinner B, Novak A, Wintersteiger R, Fröhlich E: The role of nanoparticle size in hemocompatibility. Toxicology 2009, 258(2–3):139–147. 10.1016/j.tox.2009.01.015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sadiq IM, Chowdhury B, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A: Antimicrobial sensitivity of Escherichia coli to alumina nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2009, 5(3):282–286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu F, Yuan Y, Shan X, Liu C, Tao X, Sheng Y, Zhou H: Long-circulation of hemoglobin-loaded polymeric nanoparticles as oxygen carriers with modulated surface charges. Int J Pharm 2009, 377(1–2):199–206. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.05.015View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pathak A, Kumar P, Chuttani K, Jain S, Mishra AK, Vyas SP, Gupta KC: Gene expression, biodistribution, and pharmacoscintigraphic evaluation of chondroitin sulfate-PEI nanoconstructs mediated tumor gene therapy. ACS Nano 2009, 3(6):1493–1505. 10.1021/nn900044fView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang LW, Monteiro-Riviere NA: Mechanisms of quantum dot nanoparticle cellular uptake. Toxicol Sci 2009, 110(1):138–155. 10.1093/toxsci/kfp087View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nam HY, Kwon SM, Chung H, Lee SY, Kwon SH, Jeon H, Kim Y, Park JH, Kim J, Her S, Oh YK, Kwon IC, Kim K, Jeong SY: Cellular uptake mechanism and intracellular fate of hydrophobically modified glycol chitosan nanoparticles. J Control Release 2009, 135(3):259–267. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.01.018View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim BY, Jiang W, Oreopoulos J, Yip CM, Rutka JT, Chan WC: Biodegradable quantum dot nanocomposites enable live cell labeling and imaging of cytoplasmic targets. Nano Lett 2008, 8(11):3887–3892. 10.1021/nl802311tView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orr G, Panther DJ, Phillips JL, Tarasevich BJ, Dohnalkova A, Hu D, Teeguarden JG, Pounds JG: Submicrometer and nanoscale inorganic particles exploit the actin machinery to be propelled along microvilli-like structures into alveolar cells. ACS Nano 2007, 1(5):463–475. 10.1021/nn700149rView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gupta K, Singh VP, Kurupati RK, Mann A, Ganguli M, Gupta YK, Singh Y, Saleem K, Pasha S, Maiti S: Nanoparticles of cationic chimeric peptide and sodium polyacrylate exhibit striking antinociception activity at lower dose. J Control Release 2009, 134(1):47–54. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.10.008View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geys J, De Vos R, Nemery B, Hoet PH: In vitro translocation of quantum dots and influence of oxidative stress. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2009, 297(5):L903–911. 10.1152/ajplung.00029.2009View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corsi F, De Palma C, Colombo M, Allevi R, Nebuloni M, Ronchi S, Rizzi G, Tosoni A, Trabucchi E, Clementi E, Prosperi D: Towards ideal magnetofluorescent nanoparticles for bimodal detection of breast-cancer cells. Small 2009, 5(22):2555–2564. 10.1002/smll.200900881View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shvedova AA, Castranova V, Kisin ER, Schwegler-Berry D, Murray AR, Gandelsman VZ, Maynard A, Baron PJ: Exposure to carbon nanotube material: assessment of nanotube cytotoxicity using human keratinocyte cells. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2003, 66(20):1909–1926. 10.1080/713853956View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xia T, Korge P, Weiss JN, Li N, Venkatesen MI, Sioutas C, Nel A: Quinones and aromatic chemical compounds in particulate matter induce mitochondrial dysfunction: implications for ultrafine particle toxicity. Environ Health Perspect 2004, 112(14):1347–1358. 10.1289/ehp.7167PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green M, Howman E: Semiconductor quantum dots and free radical induced DNA nicking. Chem Commun 2005 (1):121–123.Google Scholar
- Hussain SM, Hess KL, Gearhart JM, Geiss KT, Schlager JJ: In vitro toxicity of nanoparticles in BRL 3A rat liver cells. Toxicol in Vitro 2005, 19(7):975–983. 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.034View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sayes CM, Gobin AM, Ausman KD, Mendez J, West JL, Colvin VL: Nano-C60 cytotoxicity is due to lipid peroxidation. Biomaterials 2005, 26(36):7587–7595. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.027View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foster KA, Galeffi F, Gerich FJ, Turner DA, Muller M: Optical and pharmacological tools to investigate the role of mitochondria during oxidative stress and neurodegeneratation. Prog Neurobiol 2006, 79(3):136–171. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.07.001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin W, Huang YW, Zhou XD, Ma Y: Toxicity of cerium oxide nanoparticles in human lung cancer cells. Int J Toxicol 2006, 25(6):451–457. 10.1080/10915810600959543View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Limbach LK, Wick P, Manser P, Grass RN, Bruinink A, Stark WJ: Exposure of engineered nanoparticles to human lung epithelial cells: influence of chemical composition and catalytic activity on oxidative stress. Environ Sci Technol 2007, 41(11):4158–4163. 10.1021/es062629tView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Monteiller C, Tran L, MacNee W, Faux S, Jones A, Miller B, Donaldson K: The pro-inflammatory effects of low-toxicity low-solubility particles, nanoparticles and fine particles, on epithelial cells in vitro: the role of surface area. Occup Environ Med 2007, 64(9):609–615. 10.1136/oem.2005.024802PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schubert D, Dargusch R, Raitano J, Chan SW: Cerium and yttrium oxide nanoparticles are neuroprotective. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006, 342(1):86–91. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.129View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pan Y, Leifert A, Ruau D, Neuss S, Bornemann J, Schmid G, Brandau W, Simon U, Jahnen-Dechent W: Gold nanoparticles of diameter 1.4 nm trigger necrosis by oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Small 2009, 5(18):2067–2076. 10.1002/smll.200900466View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiohara A, Hanada S, Prabakar S, Fujioka K, Lim TH, Yamamoto K, Northcote PT, Tilley RD: Chemical reactions on surface molecules attached to silicon quantum dots. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132(1):248–253. 10.1021/ja906501vView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodman CM, McCusker CD, Yilmaz T, Rotello VM: Toxicity of gold nanoparticles functionalized with cationic and anionic side chains. Bioconjugate Chem 2004, 15(4):897–900. 10.1021/bc049951iView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reddy LH, Sharma RK, Chuttani K, Mishra AK, Murthy RR: Etoposide-incorporated tripalmitin nanoparticles with different surface charge: formulation, characterization, radiolabelling, and biodistribution studies. AAPS J 2004, 6(3):e23. 10.1208/aapsj060323View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sengupta S, Tyagi P, Velpandian T, Gupta YK, Gupta SK: Etoposide encapsulated in positively charged liposomes: pharmacokinetic studies in mice and formulation stability studies. Pharmacol Res 2000, 42(5):459–464. 10.1006/phrs.2000.0714View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levchenko TS, Rammohan R, Lukyanov AN, Whiteman KR, Torchilin VP: Liposome clearance in mice: the effect of a separate and combined presence of surface charge and polymer coating. Int J Pharm 2002, 240(1–2):95–102. 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00129-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aoki H, Sun C, Fuji K, Miyajima K: Disposition kinetics of liposomes modified with synthetic aminoglycolipids in rats. Int J Pharm 1995, 115: 183–191. 10.1016/0378-5173(94)00252-ZView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez-Caselles T, Villalain J, Gomez-Fernandez JC: Influence of liposome charge and composition on their interaction with human blood serum proteins. Mol Cell Biochem 1993, 120: 119–126. 10.1007/BF00926084View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xia T, Kovochich M, Brant J, Hotze M, Sempf J, Oberley T, Sioutas C, Yeh JI, Wiesner MR, Nel AE: Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm. Nano Lett 2006, 6(8):1794–1807. 10.1021/nl061025kView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stone V, Donaldson K: Nanotoxicology: signs of stress. Nat Nanotechnol 2006, 1(1):23–24. 10.1038/nnano.2006.69View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foucaud L, Wilson MR, Brown DM, Stone V: Measurement of reactive species production by nanoparticles prepared in biologically relevant media. Toxicol Lett 2007, 174(1–3):1–9. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.08.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson MR, Lightbody JH, Donaldson K, Sales J, Stone V: Interactions between ultrafine particles and transition metals in vivo and in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2002, 184(3):172–179. 10.1006/taap.2002.9501View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donaldson K, Aitken R, Tran L, Stone V, Duffin R, Forrest G, Alexander A: Carbon nanotubes: a review of their properties in relation to pulmonary toxicology and workplace safety. Toxicol Sci 2006, 92(1):5–22. 10.1093/toxsci/kfj130View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown DM, Donaldson K, Borm PJ, Schins RP, Dehnhardt M, Gilmour P, Jimenez LA, Stone V: Calcium and ROS-mediated activation of transcription factors and TNF-alpha cytokine gene expression in macrophages exposed to ultrafine particles. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004, 286(2):L344-L353. 10.1152/ajplung.00139.2003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li N, Sioutas C, Cho A, Schmitz D, Misra C, Sempf J, Wang M, Oberley T, Froines J, Nel A: Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ Health Perspect 2003, 111(4):455–460. 10.1289/ehp.6000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karataş ÖF, Sezgin E, Aydin Ö, Çulha M: Interaction of gold nanoparticles with mitochondria. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2009, 71(2):315–318. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.02.020View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Supino R: Methods in Molecular Biology. In Vitro Toxicity Testing Protocols. Volume 43. Edited by: S. O'Hare and C. K. Atterwill. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ; Ch. 16
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.