Amorphous nanosilica induce endocytosis-dependent ROS generation and DNA damage in human keratinocytes
- Hiromi Nabeshi1, 2,
- Tomoaki Yoshikawa1, 2Email author,
- Keigo Matsuyama1, 2,
- Yasutaro Nakazato1, 2,
- Saeko Tochigi1, 2,
- Sayuri Kondoh1, 2,
- Toshiro Hirai1, 2,
- Takanori Akase1, 2,
- Kazuya Nagano2,
- Yasuhiro Abe2,
- Yasuo Yoshioka2, 3,
- Haruhiko Kamada2, 3,
- Norio Itoh1,
- Shin-ichi Tsunoda1, 2, 3 and
- Yasuo Tsutsumi1, 2, 3Email author
© Nabeshi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 13 September 2010
Accepted: 15 January 2011
Published: 15 January 2011
Clarifying the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials is crucial for hazard assessment and the safe application of these substances. With this in mind, we analyzed the relationship between particle size and the in vitro effect of amorphous nanosilica (nSP). Specifically, we evaluated the relationship between particle size of nSP and the in vitro biological effects using human keratinocyte cells (HaCaT).
Our results indicate that exposure to nSP of 70 nm diameter (nSP70) induced an elevated level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to DNA damage. A markedly reduced response was observed using submicron-sized silica particles of 300 and 1000 nm diameter. In addition, cytochalasin D-treatment reduced nSP70-mediated ROS generation and DNA damage, suggesting that endocytosis is involved in nSP70-mediated cellular effects.
Thus, particle size affects amorphous silica-induced ROS generation and DNA damage of HaCaT cells. We believe clarification of the endocytosis pathway of nSP will provide useful information for hazard assessment as well as the design of safer forms of nSPs.
With recent developments in nanotechnology, various kinds of nanomaterials have been designed and produced throughout the world. Nanomaterials have been widely used in consumer and industrial applications, such as medicine, cosmetics and foods, because they exhibit unique physicochemical properties and innovative functions . For example, materials such as amorphous silica nanoparticles (nSPs) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) are colorless and reflect ultraviolet light more efficiently than micro-sized particles. Consequently, these substances are already used as functional ingredients in many cosmetics such as foundation creams and sunscreens.
However, concerns over the potentially harmful effects of nanomaterials have been raised precisely because they possess novel properties that are different from those of microsized materials. Increasing numbers of studies show that many types of nanomaterials, such as carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, quantum dots, zinc oxide and TiO2, have a harmful effect on cells and rodents [2–14]. For example, previous studies reported that various nanoparticles induced toxicological effects mainly in lung, liver, spleen and kidney tissues [3, 10, 15–19]. In vivo toxicity studies in Sprague Dawley rats showed that inhaled silver nanoparticles elicited chronic inflammation in the lungs . After intravenous injection with silica nanoparticles in BALB/c mice, 70 nm particles induced liver injury at 30 mg/kg, while 300 nm or 1000 nm had no effect . Recent evidence indicates that the small size and high surface area of nanomaterials may cause unpredictable genotoxic properties . For example, induction of DNA damage by gold-, silver-, cobalt-, TiO2-nanoparticles has been reported. The results from various studies suggest that these nanomaterials may cause DNA damage by an indirect pathway through promoting oxidative stress and inflammatory responses via dysfunction of mitochondria or inflammasomes. Central to the study of nanotoxicology is genotoxicity, the study of genetic aberrations following exposure to nanomaterials, because it is known that an increased genetic instability is associated with the development of cancer.
A sufficient understanding of the relationship between the physicochemical characteristics of nanomaterials governing their cytotoxicity (i.e. genotoxicity) and the identification of factors that influence their associated hazards are essential for the development of safer nanomaterials [22–25]. Since the linkage analysis is the sole methods for developing safe nanomaterials, many researchers have conducted extensive efforts [26–30]. In this context, the aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between particle size and in vitro hazard of amorphous nanosilica (nSP), especially focusing on DNA damage, using human keratinocyte cells.
Results and Discussion
8-OH-dG is known as a major index of oxidative DNA damage related to mutagenesis, carcinogenesis and the aging process [40, 41]. These reports, together with our results, suggest the possibility that nSP70 may be carcinogenic. Moreover, nSP-induced ROS may induce genotoxicity via DNA strand breaks, oxidative DNA damage and mutation. Indeed, DNA damage was detected in nSP70-treated HaCaT cells. In addition, nSP70-mediated DNA damage was inhibited by pre-treatment with the ROS scavenger, N-acetylcystein (NAC) (Figure 3D and 3E). From the results of the present study, we suggest that ROS play an important role in cellular responses such as nSP-induced DNA damage. However, the reason why ROS generation varies with particle size has not yet been clarified.
A number of mechanisms underlie the ability of nanoparticles to cause DNA damage. As mentioned above, a key mechanism that is often described is the ability of particles to cause the production of ROS [32, 56]. One possible mechanism of particle-mediated DNA damage is the ability of particles to stimulate target cells to produce oxidants/genotoxic compounds e.g., by affecting mitochondrial electron transport, activation of NADPH oxidase, or inducing cytochrome P450 enzymes. Our results show that nSP70-mediated DNA damage of HaCaT cells occurred via a mechanism that did not involve NADPH oxidase. Alternatively, transition metal ions (such as cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, nickel, titanium and zinc) released from certain nanoparticles have the potential to cause the conversion of cellular oxygen metabolic products such as H2O2 and superoxide anions to hydroxyl radicals, which is one of the primary DNA damaging species. Well-known examples of the consequences of metal ion-contamination in relation to nanotoxicity have been described for carbon nanotubes. Indeed, iron contaminants in CNT have been shown to result in a substantial loss of glutathione and increased lipid peroxidation in alveolar macrophages, indicators of oxidative stress . However, our data suggests that the nSPs used in this study, nSP70, nSP300 and mSP1000, were not contaminated with metal ions (data not shown). Thus, it is highly unlikely that metal ion contamination is involved in nSP70-induced DNA damage. Another hypothesis is that the size of nSPs is related to its oxidative stress. As particle size decreases, the particle unit of mass and overall surface area increases. This larger surface area enhances catalytic activity. Indeed, it has been widely reported that increased surface area of these particles increases reactivity because surface atoms have a tendency to possess high energy bonds. In order to gain stabilization, these surface bonds will readily react with other molecules . The specific surface area was calculated by means of the following equation; s = 6/dρ (where s, specific surface area (m2/g); ρ, density (g/cc); d, diameter (μm)). The specific surface area of nSP70, nSP300 and mSP1000 calculated using this equation was 43, 10 and 3 m2/g, respectively. When specific area is considered, rather than particle concentration, the membrane damage activity of nSP70 and nSP300-treated cells shows almost the same level of LDH release per unit surface area (data not shown). In terms of ROS generation and DNA oxidation, nSP70 is more potent than nSP300. These results suggest that nSP70, which possesses a larger specific surface area compared to the counterpart micron-sized silica particles, has a much greater chance of interaction with biomolecules. Consequently, nSP70 causes direct cellular damage and promotion of oxidative stress. In addition to these hypotheses, nanoparticles may gain direct access to DNA via nuclear transport. However, this mechanism seems very unlikely given that the nuclear pore complex is known to be 8-30 nm in diameter, depending on cell type . Nonetheless, some studies have reported that nanoparticles can penetrate the nuclear membrane, such as silica nanoparticles (40-70 nm) . Detailed analysis of the mechanism of DNA damage induced by nanoparticles is currently underway. This information will be a critical determinant in the design of safer nSPs and will provide valuable information for hazard assessment of nSPs.
Here, we report the effects induced by well-dispersed amorphous silica particles (nSPs) on human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells. In addition to our own work, other studies have shown that well-dispersed nSPs induce cytotoxicity, including LDH release, in a dose-dependent and size-dependent manner using a macrophage cell line [61, 62]. On the other hands, Lin et al. reported that nSPs mediated cytotoxicity/DNA damage against A549 cells were not correlated with particle size . Further, Barnes et al. reported that nSP induce no genotoxicity in fibroblast 3T3-L1 cells. From the viewpoint of nSP-mediated toxicity, there is no consistency in these four reports including our findings. As mentioned above, there are a number of examples in the literature of conflicting results regarding nSPs. It has becoming increasingly evident that the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials, such as the size, shape, surface charge, fabricating method, etc, play a central role in governing their cellular uptake and subsequent physiologic consequences. Furthermore, experimental conditions, such as cell type and incubation time, are critical for the nanotoxicologic studies. Hence, given the inconsistencies it is difficult to draw the same conclusions. However, our results using well-dispersed nSPs indicated that nSPs were more cytotoxic and genotoxic against the human keratinocyte cell line HaCaT.
In this study, we show that nSP induce certain cellular responses, such as ROS generation and DNA damage. By contrast, their bulk-sized counterparts display a much reduced response. These different responses might be partly due to different mechanisms, such as intracellular uptake and ROS generation. We speculated that receptor-mediated uptake was involved in these phenomena and set out to identify the physicochemical properties that affect receptor endocytosis. We believe a detailed analysis of nSP-internalization will be invaluable for both hazard assessment and the design of safe nSPs.
Materials and methods
Suspensions of fluorescent (red-F)-labeled amorphous silica particles (Micromod Partikeltechnologie GmbH) (25 mg/ml and 50 mg/ml) were used in this study; particle size diameters were 70, 300 and 1000 nm (designated as nSP70, nSP300 and mSP1000, respectively). Silica particle suspensions were stored in the dark at room temperature. The suspensions were sonicated for 5 min and then vortexed for 1 min immediately prior to use.
The HaCaT human keratinocyte cell line was kindly provided by Dr. Inui , Osaka University. HaCaT cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (D-MEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 0.2 mM L-glutamine. The cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 37°C (95% room air, 5% CO2).
Physicochemical examinations of silica particles
Silica particle suspensions were diluted to 0.25 mg/ml (nSP70), 0.5 mg/ml (nSP300 and mSP1000) with water or PBS, respectively and the average particle sizes were then measured using the Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd). The mean size and the size distribution of silica particles were measured by a dynamic light scattering method. The size and shape of silica particles were determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Each silica particle suspension was dropped on the sample stage and dried. The dried silica particles were then observed by SEM.
LDH release assay
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is released from HaCaT cells exposed to nSP70, nSP300 or mSP1000. The LDH activity of the supernatant of the culture medium was determined using a commercial LDH cytotoxicity test (WAKO, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, 5 × 103 cells were seeded into each well of a 96-well plate. After 24 h incubation, cells were treated with nSP70, nSP300, mSP1000 or 0.2% Tween 20 (positive control). After a further 24 h incubation period, 50 μl of medium overlying cells was used for LDH analysis. Absorption of light at 560 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer.
Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)
The generation of total intracellular ROS was measured by monitoring the increasing fluorescence of 2'7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCF). The cell-permeant 2'7'-dichlorodihydorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) enters the cell where intracellular esterases cleave off the diacetate group. The resulting DCFH is retained in the cytoplasm and oxidized to DCF by ROS. Hydroxyl radical was measured by monitoring the increasing fluorescence of hydroxyphenyl fluorescein (HPF; SEKISUI MEDICAL Co., Ltd., Japan). 3 × 104 HaCaT cells were seeded into each well of a 96-well plate. After 24 h incubation, cells were treated with nSP70, nSP100, nSP300, mSP1000 or 2 mM H2O2 (positive control). Cells were then washed once with phenol red-free medium, and incubated in 100 μl working solution of DCFH-DA or HPF (10 μM) at 37°C for 30 min. Using the fluorescence reader (ARVO MX; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA), the fluorescence of DCF or HPF was monitored at the excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 nm and 530 nm or 490 nm and 515 nm, respectively.
8-Hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) measurement
HaCaT cells were seeded on a 100 mm dish. After 24 h, cells were treated with various concentrations of nSP70, nSP300, mSP1000, 0.2 mM H2O2 (positive control) or PBS (negative control). After 3 h, cellular DNA was isolated using DNeasy tissue kit (QIAGEN, Germany). Ten μg of DNA was converted to single stranded DNA by incubation with 180 U Exonuclease III (Takara Biotech., Japan) at 37°C for 1 h. The DNA was heated at 95°C for 5 min, rapidly chilled on ice, and digested to nucleosides by incubation with 0.6 U nuclease P1 (Takara) at 37°C for 1 h followed by treatment with 0.6 U E. coli alkaline phosphatase (Takara) for a further 1 h. The reaction mixture was centrifuged (6000 × g for 1 min) and the supernatant used for the 8-OHdG assay. The amount of 8-OHdG was measured according to the protocol of the competitive ELISA kit (8-OHdG check; Japan Institute for the Control of Aging, Japan).
Effects of inhibitor of ROS, endocytosis or NADPH oxidase on DNA strand breaks induced by silica particles
3 × 104 HaCaT cells were pretreated with 2 mM N-acetylcystein (NAC, ROS scavenger), 10 mM cytochalasin D (endocytosis inhibitor) or 40 mM apocynin (NADPH oxidase inhibitor) for 30 min prior to incubation with 90 mg/ml of nSP70 for 3 h. As a positive control, HaCaT cells were treated with 0.2 mM H2O2 for 3 h. DNA strand breaks were detected by alkaline comet assay according to the Comet Assay Kit (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD). The samples were processed according to the protocol provided in the kit. Twenty-five cells on each slide, randomly selected by fluorescence microscopy, were then analyzed using the Comet Analyzer (Youworks Corporation, Japan).
Effects of inhibitor of endocytosis, NADPH oxidase or endosomal acidification on generation of ROS induced by silica particles
HaCaT cells were pretreated with various concentration of cytochalasin D (Merck Ltd., Germany) for 30 min prior to incubation with 270 mg/ml nSP70 for 3 h. ROS induced by treatment with silica particles were expressed as relative fluorescence units in the DCFH-DA assay as described above.
Statistical comparisons between groups were performed by one-way ANOVA and a Bonferroni post hoc test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). This study was also supported in part by Health Labour Sciences Research Grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan; by Health Sciences Research Grants for Research on Publicly Essential Drugs and Medical Devices from the Japan Health Sciences Foundation; by a Global Environment Research Fund from Minister of the Environment; and by a the Knowledge Cluster Initiative; and by Food Safety Commission; and by The Nagai Foundation Tokyo; and by The Cosmetology Research Foundation; and by The Smoking Research Foundation.
- Salata O: Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. J Nanobiotechnology 2004, 2: 3. 10.1186/1477-3155-2-3PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aiso S, Yamazaki K, Umeda Y, Asakura M, Takaya M, Toya T, Koda S, Nagano K, Arito H, Fukushima S: Pulmonary Toxicity of Intratracheally Instilled Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes in Male Fischer 344 Rats. Ind Health 2010, in press.Google Scholar
- Chen J, Dong X, Zhao J, Tang G: In vivo acute toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to mice after intraperitioneal injection. J Appl Toxicol 2009, 29: 330–337. 10.1002/jat.1414PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geys J, Nemmar A, Verbeken E, Smolders E, Ratoi M, Hoylaerts MF, Nemery B, Hoet PH: Acute toxicity and prothrombotic effects of quantum dots: impact of surface charge. Environ Health Perspect 2008, 116: 1607–1613. 10.1289/ehp.11566PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heng BC, Zhao X, Xiong S, Ng KW, Boey FY, Loo JS: Toxicity of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles on human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) is accentuated by oxidative stress. Food Chem Toxicol 2010, 48: 1762–1766. 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.023PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kocbek P, Teskac K, Kreft ME, Kristl J: Toxicological Aspects of Long-Term Treatment of Keratinocytes with ZnO and TiO(2) Nanoparticles. Small 2010, 6: 1908–1917. 10.1002/smll.201000032PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu S, Xu L, Zhang T, Ren G, Yang Z: Oxidative stress and apoptosis induced by nanosized titanium dioxide in PC12 cells. Toxicology 2010, 267: 172–177. 10.1016/j.tox.2009.11.012PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moos PJ, Chung K, Woessner D, Honeggar M, Cutler NS, Veranth JM: ZnO particulate matter requires cell contact for toxicity in human colon cancer cells. Chem Res Toxicol 2010, 23: 733–739. 10.1021/tx900203vPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murray AR, Kisin E, Leonard SS, Young SH, Kommineni C, Kagan VE, Castranova V, Shvedova AA: Oxidative stress and inflammatory response in dermal toxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Toxicology 2009, 257: 161–171. 10.1016/j.tox.2008.12.023PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park EJ, Kim H, Kim Y, Yi J, Choi K, Park K: Carbon fullerenes (C60s) can induce inflammatory responses in the lung of mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010, 244: 226–233. 10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.036PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WA, Seaton A, Stone V, Brown S, Macnee W, Donaldson K: Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol 2008, 3: 423–428. 10.1038/nnano.2008.111PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shin JA, Lee EJ, Seo SM, Kim HS, Kang JL, Park EM: Nanosized titanium dioxide enhanced inflammatory responses in the septic brain of mouse. Neuroscience 2010, 165: 445–454. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.10.057PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takagi A, Hirose A, Nishimura T, Fukumori N, Ogata A, Ohashi N, Kitajima S, Kanno J: Induction of mesothelioma in p53+/- mouse by intraperitoneal application of multi-wall carbon nanotube. J Toxicol Sci 2008, 33: 105–116. 10.2131/jts.33.105PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yamashita K, Yoshioka Y, Higashisaka K, Morishita Y, Yoshida T, Fujimura M, Kayamuro H, Nabeshi H, Yamashita T, Nagano K, et al.: Carbon nanotubes elicit DNA damage and inflammatory response relative to their size and shape. Inflammation 2010, 33: 276–280. 10.1007/s10753-010-9182-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen Z, Meng H, Xing G, Chen C, Zhao Y, Jia G, Wang T, Yuan H, Ye C, Zhao F, et al.: Acute toxicological effects of copper nanoparticles in vivo. Toxicol Lett 2006, 163: 109–120. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.10.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duan Y, Liu J, Ma L, Li N, Liu H, Wang J, Zheng L, Liu C, Wang X, Zhao X, et al.: Toxicological characteristics of nanoparticulate anatase titanium dioxide in mice. Biomaterials 2010, 31: 894–899. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li JJ, Muralikrishnan S, Ng CT, Yung LY, Bay BH: Nanoparticle-induced pulmonary toxicity. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2010, 235: 1025–1033.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li N, Duan Y, Hong M, Zheng L, Fei M, Zhao X, Wang J, Cui Y, Liu H, Cai J, et al.: Spleen injury and apoptotic pathway in mice caused by titanium dioxide nanoparticules. Toxicol Lett 2010, 195: 161–168. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.03.1116PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liang G, Yin L, Zhang J, Liu R, Zhang T, Ye B, Pu Y: Effects of subchronic exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes on mice. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2010, 73: 463–470. 10.1080/15287390903523378PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sung JH, Ji JH, Yoon JU, Kim DS, Song MY, Jeong J, Han BS, Han JH, Chung YH, Kim J, et al.: Lung function changes in Sprague-Dawley rats after prolonged inhalation exposure to silver nanoparticles. Inhal Toxicol 2008, 20: 567–574. 10.1080/08958370701874671PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishimori H, Kondoh M, Isoda K, Tsunoda S, Tsutsumi Y, Yagi K: Silica nanoparticles as hepatotoxicants. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2009, 72: 496–501. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2009.02.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aillon KL, Xie Y, El-Gendy N, Berkland CJ, Forrest ML: Effects of nanomaterial physicochemical properties on in vivo toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009, 61: 457–466. 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.010PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoshino A, Fujioka K, Oku T, Suga M, Sasaki FY, Ohta T, Yasuhara M, Suzuki K, Yamamoto K: Physicochemical Properties and Cellular Toxicity of Nanocrystal Quantum Dots Depend on Their Surface Modification. Nano Letters 2004, 4: 2163–2169. 10.1021/nl048715dView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morishige T, Yoshioka Y, Inakura H, Tanabe A, Yao X, Narimatsu S, Monobe Y, Imazawa T, Tsunoda S, Tsutsumi Y, et al.: The effect of surface modification of amorphous silica particles on NLRP3 inflammasome mediated IL-1beta production, ROS production and endosomal rupture. Biomaterials 2010, 31: 6833–6842. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.036PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sohaebuddin SK, Thevenot PT, Baker D, Eaton JW, Tang L: Nanomaterial cytotoxicity is composition, size, and cell type dependent. Part Fibre Toxicol 2010, 7: 22. 10.1186/1743-8977-7-22PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fourches D, Pu D, Tassa C, Weissleder R, Shaw SY, Mumper RJ, Tropsha A: Quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship modeling. ACS Nano 2010, 4: 5703–5712. 10.1021/nn1013484PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Puzyn T, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J: Toward the development of "nano-QSARs": advances and challenges. Small 2009, 5: 2494–2509. 10.1002/smll.200900179PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shaw SY, Westly EC, Pittet MJ, Subramanian A, Schreiber SL, Weissleder R: Perturbational profiling of nanomaterial biologic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105: 7387–7392. 10.1073/pnas.0802878105PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tropsha A, Golbraikh A: Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening. Curr Pharm Des 2007, 13: 3494–3504. 10.2174/138161207782794257PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weissleder R, Kelly K, Sun EY, Shtatland T, Josephson L: Cell-specific targeting of nanoparticles by multivalent attachment of small molecules. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23: 1418–1423. 10.1038/nbt1159PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Borm P, Klaessig FC, Landry TD, Moudgil B, Pauluhn J, Thomas K, Trottier R, Wood S: Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials, part V: role of dissolution in biological fate and effects of nanoscale particles. Toxicol Sci 2006, 90: 23–32. 10.1093/toxsci/kfj084PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N: Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311: 622–627. 10.1126/science.1114397PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rahman IA, Vejayakumaran P, Sipaut SC, Ismail J, Chee KC: Size-dependent physicochemical and optical properties of silica nanoparticles. Materials Chemistry and Physics 2009, 114: 328–332. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.09.068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xia T, Kovochich M, Brant J, Hotze M, Sempf J, Oberley T, Sioutas C, Yeh JI, Wiesner MR, Nel AE: Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm. Nano Lett 2006, 6: 1794–1807. 10.1021/nl061025kPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eom HJ, Choi J: Oxidative stress of silica nanoparticles in human bronchial epithelial cell, Beas-2B. Toxicol In Vitro 2009, 23: 1326–1332. 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.07.010PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin W, Huang YW, Zhou XD, Ma Y: In vitro toxicity of silica nanoparticles in human lung cancer cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2006, 217: 252–259. 10.1016/j.taap.2006.10.004PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang F, Gao F, Lan M, Yuan H, Huang Y, Liu J: Oxidative stress contributes to silica nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity in human embryonic kidney cells. Toxicol In Vitro 2009, 23: 808–815. 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.04.009PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dostert C, Petrilli V, Van Bruggen R, Steele C, Mossman BT, Tschopp J: Innate immune activation through Nalp3 inflammasome sensing of asbestos and silica. Science 2008, 320: 674–677. 10.1126/science.1156995PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hornung V, Bauernfeind F, Halle A, Samstad EO, Kono H, Rock KL, Fitzgerald KA, Latz E: Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization. Nat Immunol 2008, 9: 847–856. 10.1038/ni.1631PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ames BN: Dietary carcinogens and anticarcinogens. Oxygen radicals and degenerative diseases. Science 1983, 221: 1256–1264. 10.1126/science.6351251PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harman D: The aging process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981, 78: 7124–7128. 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7124PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li Z, Hyseni X, Carter JD, Soukup JM, Dailey LA, Huang YC: Pollutant particles enhanced H2O2 production from NAD(P)H oxidase and mitochondria in human pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2006, 291: C357–365. 10.1152/ajpcell.00365.2005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang T, Chiang ET, Moreno-Vinasco L, Lang GD, Pendyala S, Samet JM, Geyh AS, Breysse PN, Chillrud SN, Natarajan V, Garcia JG: Particulate matter disrupts human lung endothelial barrier integrity via ROS- and p38 MAPK-dependent pathways. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2010, 42: 442–449. 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0402OCPubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chamulitrat W, Stremmel W, Kawahara T, Rokutan K, Fujii H, Wingler K, Schmidt HH, Schmidt R: A constitutive NADPH oxidase-like system containing gp91phox homologs in human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 2004, 122: 1000–1009. 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.22410.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldman R, Moshonov S, Zor U: Generation of reactive oxygen species in a human keratinocyte cell line: role of calcium. Arch Biochem Biophys 1998, 350: 10–18. 10.1006/abbi.1997.0478PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldman R, Moshonov S, Zor U: Calcium-dependent PAF-stimulated generation of reactive oxygen species in a human keratinocyte cell line. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999, 1438: 349–358.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sekharam M, Cunnick JM, Wu J: Involvement of lipoxygenase in lysophosphatidic acid-stimulated hydrogen peroxide release in human HaCaT keratinocytes. Biochem J 2000,346(Pt 3):751–758. 10.1042/0264-6021:3460751PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sampath P, Pollard TD: Effects of cytochalasin, phalloidin, and pH on the elongation of actin filaments. Biochemistry 1991, 30: 1973–1980. 10.1021/bi00221a034PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lambeth JD: NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen. Nat Rev Immunol 2004, 4: 181–189. 10.1038/nri1312PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li Q, Zhang Y, Marden JJ, Banfi B, Engelhardt JF: Endosomal NADPH oxidase regulates c-Src activation following hypoxia/reoxygenation injury. Biochem J 2008, 411: 531–541. 10.1042/BJ20071534PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ushio-Fukai M: Localizing NADPH oxidase-derived ROS. Sci STKE 2006, 2006: re8. 10.1126/stke.3492006re8PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morishige T, Yoshioka Y, Tanabe A, Yao X, Tsunoda S, Tsutsumi Y, Mukai Y, Okada N, Nakagawa S: Titanium dioxide induces different levels of IL-1beta production dependent on its particle characteristics through caspase-1 activation mediated by reactive oxygen species and cathepsin B. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010, 392: 160–165. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.12.178PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fubini B, Hubbard A: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation by silica in inflammation and fibrosis. Free Radic Biol Med 2003, 34: 1507–1516. 10.1016/S0891-5849(03)00149-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meyer JW, Schmitt ME: A central role for the endothelial NADPH oxidase in atherosclerosis. FEBS Lett 2000, 472: 1–4. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01397-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawahara T, Kuwano Y, Teshima-Kondo S, Kawai T, Nikawa T, Kishi K, Rokutan K: Toll-like receptor 4 regulates gastric pit cell responses to Helicobacter pylori infection. J Med Invest 2001, 48: 190–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schins RP: Mechanisms of genotoxicity of particles and fibers. Inhal Toxicol 2002, 14: 57–78. 10.1080/089583701753338631PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kagan VE, Tyurina YY, Tyurin VA, Konduru NV, Potapovich AI, Osipov AN, Kisin ER, Schwegler-Berry D, Mercer R, Castranova V, Shvedova AA: Direct and indirect effects of single walled carbon nanotubes on RAW 264.7 macrophages: role of iron. Toxicol Lett 2006, 165: 88–100. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.02.001PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oberdorster G, Geleinr R, Johnston C, Mercer P, Corson N, Finkelstein J: Ambient ultra fine particles: Inducers of acute Lung injury? Relationships between respiratory disease and exposure to air pollution. ILSI Press, Washington, DC; 1998:216–229.Google Scholar
- Terry LJ, Shows EB, Wente SR: Crossing the nuclear envelope: hierarchical regulation of nucleocytoplasmic transport. Science 2007, 318: 1412–1416. 10.1126/science.1142204PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen M, von Mikecz A: Formation of nucleoplasmic protein aggregates impairs nuclear function in response to SiO2 nanoparticles. Exp Cell Res 2005, 305: 51–62. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.12.021PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lison D, Thomassen LC, Rabolli V, Gonzalez L, Napierska D, Seo JW, Kirsch-Volders M, Hoet P, Kirschhock CE, Martens JA: Nominal and effective dosimetry of silica nanoparticles in cytotoxicity assays. Toxicol Sci 2008, 104: 155–162. 10.1093/toxsci/kfn072PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Waters KM, Masiello LM, Zangar RC, Tarasevich BJ, Karin NJ, Quesenberry RD, Bandyopadhyay S, Teeguarden JG, Pounds JG, Thrall BD: Macrophage responses to silica nanoparticles are highly conserved across particle sizes. Toxicol Sci 2009, 107: 553–569. 10.1093/toxsci/kfn250PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barnes CA, Elsaesser A, Arkusz J, Smok A, Palus J, Lesniak A, Salvati A, Hanrahan JP, Jong WH, Dziubaltowska E, et al.: Reproducible comet assay of amorphous silica nanoparticles detects no genotoxicity. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 3069–3074. 10.1021/nl801661wPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inui S, Lee YF, Haake AR, Goldsmith LA, Chang C: Induction of TR4 orphan receptor by retinoic acid in human HaCaT keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 1999, 112: 426–431. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00548.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.