Skip to main content

Table 4 The importance of crystallinity to TiO2 toxicity

From: Identification of the mechanisms that drive the toxicity of TiO2 particulates: the contribution of physicochemical characteristics

Paper

TiO2 crystal form

Model

Finding

Toxic potency

Dunford et al., [58]

TiO2 extracted from sunscreens (content ranging from 50/50 anatase/rutile, to 100% anatase or rutile)

Pure Anatase (100%)

Pure Rutile (100%)

Oxidation of organic material (phenol)

DNA plasmids in vitro

Comet Assay (MRC-5 fibroblasts)

(ALL conducted in presence of sunlight)

TiO2 stimulates oxidation of organic materials (due to production of hydroxyl radicals), on illumination

Strand breaks in plasmid DNA. The damage suppressed by free radical quenchers (mannitol &DMSO) - illustrates that it is oxidant (hydroxyl) driven

DNA damage observed in comet assay, and again is oxidant driven

Anatase > rutile.

Derives from greater photocatalytic activity.

Lu et al., [51]

Pure anatase (5 nm)

Pure rutile (50 nm)

Anatase/rutile mixture (21 nm)

Protein tyrosine nitration

(Conducted in presence of UV light)

TiO2 increased protein tyrosine nitration (indicative of oxidative and nitrative stress)

Anatase >anatase/rutile > rutile

BUT other physicochemical differences such as size were, not controlled for, which may contribute to response

Nakagawa et al, [59]

Anatase form (21 nm)

Anatase form (255 nm)

Rutile form (255 nm)

Rutile form (420 nm)

In vitro genotoxicity assays:

Microbial mutation assay-S. Typhimurium

Mammalian cell mutation assay (L5178Y cells)

Chromosomal aberration assay (CHL/IU cells)

(experiments conducted in presence or absence of UV light)

Weak genotoxicity in absence of UV light

With irradiation, TiO2 particles were genotoxic in all tests

Anatase > rutile

Phototoxic component to response

21 nm anatase sample most toxic (illustrates that size may also contribute to response)

Pan et al. [72]

Rutile (15 nm)

Anatase (200 nm)

Human dermal fibroblasts

Cell area, morphology & actin

Cell proliferation

Wound healing function

Cell migration

Particle internalisation

Cell morphology detrimentally affected and cell function impaired by TiO2

Anatase > rutile

Sayes et al., [71]

Pure anatase

Anatase/rutile

Pure rutile

Human dermal fibroblasts and lung carcinoma cells

Cell viability (LDH, MTT)

Inflammation (IL-8)

Ex vivo ROS production

Cytotoxicity, ROS production & cytokine release is crystal phase dependent

Anatase greater than anatase/rutile > rutile

Oxidant driven response & phototoxic component

Size of particles did not contribute to the response

Wang et al., [17]

Rutile (80 nm)

Anatase (155 nm)

Mice (intranasal)

Particle distribution in brain

Neurone morphology & toxicity

Oxidative stress (lipid and protein oxidation)

Neurochemical levels

Accumulation of particles in brain

Both particle types translocate to brain

Anatase elicit greater neurotoxicity

anatase > rutile

Warheit et al., [11]

Rutile

Anatase/rutile

Rats (intratracheal)

Inflammation (BALF cells, LDH, protein)

Histopathology

Pulmonary inflammation (nature, and length of response dependent on particle sample)

Rutile/anatase > rutile

Other factors such as particle size & agglomeration may also contribute to the response