From: Durability and inflammogenic impact of carbon nanotubes compared with asbestos fibres
Sample ID | Incubation Period (week) | % Week 0 Recovery ± SE |
---|---|---|
X607 | 0 | 100 ± 2.09 |
 | 3 | 75.8 ± 5.46 * |
 | 6 | 59.2 ± 3.2 * |
 | 10 | 46.86 ± 3.07 * |
 | 24 | 37.82 ± 6.6 * |
LFA | 0 | 100 ± 1.55 |
 | 3 | 95.53 ± 1.48 |
 | 6 | 94.13 ± 1.2 |
 | 10 | 83.76 ± 2.62 * |
 | 24 | 75.43 ± 1.33 * |
LFC | 0 | 100 ± 0.3 |
 | 3 | 77.26 ± 2.93 * |
 | 6 | 75.8 ± 2.6 * |
 | 10 | 53.79 ± 1.42 * |
 | 24 | 28.23 ± 3.03 * |
CNT SW | 0 | 100 ± 2.46 |
 | 3 | 103.92 ± 3.94 |
 | 6 | 107.08 ± 2.85 |
 | 10 | 101.51 ± 2.69 |
 | 24 | 88.68 ± 6.4 |
CNT SPIN | 0 | 100 ± 3 |
 | 3 | 99.14 ± 1.23 |
 | 6 | 101.92 ± 1.39 |
 | 10 | 102.18 ± 1.36 |
 | 24 | 114.18 ± 2.91* |
CNT LONG1 | 0 | 100 ± 1.36 |
 | 3 | 70.37 ± 6.75 * |
 | 6 | 71.99 ± 3 * |
 | 10 | 80.19 ± 7.41 |
 | 24 | 70.76 ± 2.59 * |
CNT TANG2 | 0 | 100 ± 23.85 |
 | 3 | 94.23 ± 6.01 |
 | 6 | 94.84 ± 14.94 |
 | 10 | 108.39 ± 15.83 |
 | 24 | 74.06 ± 2.58 |