Meta-analysis of transcriptomic responses as a means to identify pulmonary disease outcomes for engineered nanomaterials

Table 2 The physico-chemical properties of the ENMs investigated in the studies listed in Table 1

Reference	GSE	Name in study	Producer (particle name)	Size	BET (m²/g)
Poulsen et al. (2015) [8]	GSE35284	CNT_small	Nanocyl (NC-7000)	0.85 ± 0.457 μm × 11 ± 4.5 nm	245.8
Poulsen et al. (2015) [8]		CNT_large	IO-LE TECNanomaterials (CP-0006-SG)	4.05 ± 2.40 μm × 67 ± 2.40 nm	14.6
Bourdon et al. (2012) [10]	GSE35193	CBNPs	Evonik/Degussa (Printex 90)	14 nm	295–338
Halappanavar et al. (2011) [13]	GSE19487	NanoTiO₂	Kemira (UV-titan L181)	20 nm	107.7
Guo et al. (2012) [14]	GSE29042	MWCNT	Mitsui & Company (MWCNT-7)	3.86 μm × 49 ± 13.4 nm	not listed in study
Halappanavar et al. (2015) [7]	GSE60801	TiO₂NP^10.5	NanoAmor (NRCWE-030)	10.5 nm	139.1
		TiO₂NP³⁸	Nabond (NRCWE-025)	38 nm	28.2
		TiO₂NP¹⁰	NanoAmor (NRCWE-001)	10 nm	99
		TiO₂NP¹⁰⁺	NanoAmor (NRCWE-002)	10 nm	84
		TiO₂NP^20.6	Kemira (UV-Titan L181)	20.6 nm	107.7
Husain et al. (2015) [19]	GSE68036	CBNPs	Evonik/Degussa (Printex 90)	14 nm	295–338
Rahman et al. (manuscript in preparation)	GSE65623	Mitsui XNRi-7	Mitsui & Company (NRCWE-006)	5.7 ± 0.49 μm × 74 (29–173) nm	26
Rahman et al. (manuscript in preparation)		CNT 401	OECD WPMNM (NM-401)	4.0 ± 0.37 μm × 67 (24–138) nm	18