Skip to main content

Table 2 Colloidal characterization of ENM used in this study

From: An integrated methodology for assessing the impact of food matrix and gastrointestinal effects on the biokinetics and cellular toxicity of ingested engineered nanomaterials

Sample

d H

(nm)

D 32

(nm)

PdI

ζ

(mV)

σ

(mS/cm)

pH

Fe2O3 in water

108.3 ± 1.1

–

0.199 ± 0.007

−27.2 ± 0.4

0.03 ± 0.00

6.05

Emulsion

191.7 ± 2.2

138 ± 1

0.190 ± 0.019

−33.6 ± 1.3

0.81 ± 0.00

6.97

Emulsion + Fe2O3

200.7 ± 4.1

132 ± 3

0.243 ± 0.007

−36.3 ± 0.6

0.80 ± 0.01

6.94

Mouth digesta

365.4 ± 20.3

295 ± 9

0.489 ± 0.096

−23.0 ± 0.8

1.04 ± 0.03

6.66

Mouth digesta + Fe2O3

472.3 ± 4.3

270 ± 8

0.768 ± 0.008

−23.7 ± 1.1

1.03 ± 0.3

6.76

Stomach digesta

272.4 ± 5.9

29,967 ± 1254

0.354 ± 0.052

0.7 ± 0.5

1.49 ± 0.07

1.64

Stomach digesta + Fe2O3

332.2 ± 17.3

25,490 ± 550

0.541 ± 0.073

1.4 ± 0.2

1.40 ± 0.14

1.52

Sm. Int digesta

227.5 ± 1.7

1175 ± 182

0.322 ± 0.030

−55.2 ± 3.7

1.05 ± 0.03

7.02

Sm. Int digesta + Fe2O3

335.5 ± 0.7

491 ± 52

0.513 ± 0.015

−47.6 ± 1.7

1.08 ± 0.04

6.98

Sm. Int. digesta 1:3 D + F

1736.7 ± 160.9

405 ± 40

0.390 ± 0.130

−16.5 ± 1.1

2.23 ± 0.10

7.13

Sm. Int. digesta + Fe2O3, 1:3 D + F

1867.7 ± 144.3

336 ± 62

0.373 ± 0.023

−16.3 ± 1.6

2.29 ± 0.15

7.03

Sm. Int digesta 1:3 D-F

242.4 ± 1.7

347 ± 8

0.322 ± 0.040

−27.2 ± 1.4

2.17 ± 0.10

7.07

Sm. Int digesta + Fe2O3,1:3 D-F

394.2 ± 2.5

307 ± 52

0.536 ± 0.012

−24.9 ± 3.2

2.35 ± 0.14

7.10

  1. d H intensity-weighted mean hydrodynamic diameter by DLS, D 32 surface-weighted mean diameter by laser diffraction, PdI polydispersity index, ζ zeta potential, σ specific conductance