Skip to main content

Table 1 Geometric mean diameter of beryllium powders and process-sampled particles

From: Differences in estimates of size distribution of beryllium powder materials using phase contrast microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and liquid suspension counter techniques

 

Cyclone

Geometric mean, μm (GSD)A

Material

Stage

D50 (μm)

PCM

CCSEM

LPC

Be metal powder

2

2.5

3.0 (1.8)

NPB

1.5 (1.8)

 

3

1.7

2.7 (1.7)

NP

1.3 (1.5)

 

4

0.9

2.0 (1.5)

1.1 (1.9)

1.1 (1.6)

BeO powder

2

2.5

1.0 (1.3)

NP

1.1 (1.3)

 

3

1.7

1.2 (1.5)

NP

1.0 (1.3)

 

4

0.9

1.0 (1.4)

0.9 (1.5)

1.0 (1.3)

Process BeO

2

2.3

1.2 (1.6)

NP

--C

 

3

1.5

1.1 (1.6)

NP

--

 

4

0.7

1.2 (1.6)

1.0 (1.9)

--

Process alloy

2

2.3

2.1 (1.9)

NP

1.1 (1.3)

 

3

1.5

1.9 (1.7)

NP

1.0 (1.3)

 

4

0.7

1.6 (1.7)

--D

0.9 (1.3)

  1. A GSD = geometric standard deviation
  2. B NP = analysis not performed for this size-fraction
  3. C For the sake of efficiency in experimental design, separate LPC analyses were not performed for the process BeO material because the BeO powder material was considered representative of the process BeO material.
  4. D Greater than 60% of these particles were 0.4–0.7 μm precluding graphical determination of the GM