Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview of the key findings regarding the state of science in in vivo nanotoxicity testing of food-grade nanomaterials, categorized by nanomaterial type

From: Ingested engineered nanomaterials: state of science in nanotoxicity testing and future research needs

First author

Year

Test system

Dose range

Nanomaterial grade

PCM characterization

Standardized dispersion and characterization

Dose range rationale

Dissolution biokinetics

Main conclusions from study

Ref

Titanium dioxide

 Jiangxue Wang

2007

CD-1 (ICR) mouse model

5 g/kg bw

Not reported

XRF analysis only

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

TiO2 retained in liver, spleen, kidneys and lung tissues, suggesting uptake by gastrointestinal tract

[21]

 Yanmei Duan

2010

CD-1 (ICR) female mouse model

62.5, 125 and 250 mg/kg bw

Not reported (self-synthesized)

XRD, ICP-MS analysis

Not reported

Not reported

Not reported

Intragastric TiO2 administration in mice damages homeostasis blood system and generates immune response resulting in disruption of liver function

[85]

 Carolina M. Nogueira

2012

Bl 57/6 male mouse model

100 mg/kg bw

Commercially available for use in food, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics

DLS, XRD

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Not reported

Not reported

TiO2 micro and nanoparticles induce a Th1-mediated inflammatory response in the small intestine, especially ileum

[48]

 Yun Wang

2013

Sprague Dawley male rat model

10, 50 and 200 mg/kg bw

Not reported

TEM, ICP-AES, XRD, FTIR, SSA by BET method, hydrodynamic size, zeta potential

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Intragastric doses selected based on the intake of dietary TiO2 particles in the UK

ICP-MS and ICP-OES to measure Ti content in tissues

Young rats seem more susceptible to TiO2 nanoparticle exposure, which can provoke reductive stress in the plasma of both young and old rats but through different mechanisms

[96]

 Zhangjian Chen

2014

Sprague Dawley male rat model

10, 50 and 200 mg/kg bw/day for 30 days

Not reported

Previously characterized [96]

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Intragastric doses selected based on the intake of dietary TiO2 particles in the UK

Not reported

TiO2 nanoparticles induce DNA double strand breaks in rat bone marrow cells after repeated oral administration for 30 days. It might be practical to control the application of TiO2 nanoparticles as food additives

[62]

 Roberta Tassinari

2014

Sprague Dawley rat model

1 and 2 mg/kg bw/day for 5 days

Not reported

TEM, SEM, ICP-MS

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Dose levels selected based on the available data on the effects of TiO2 nanomaterials

ICP-MS to measure Ti content in tissues

TiO2 nanoparticles target endocrine-active tissues at dose levels relevant to human dietary intake; with no observable general toxicity and limited tissue deposition and damage in spleen

[126]

 Emilie Brun

2014

Peyer’s patches and regular ileum (ex vivo), mice model (in vivo)

12.5 mg/kg bw

Not reported (self-synthesized)

SSA by BET, XRD, TEM, agglomeration state (DLS), zeta potential, XAS

For ex vivo experiments, nanoparticle suspensions pulse sonicated at 28% amplitude– corresponding power measured using a calorimetric procedure [104].

Not reported for in vivo experiments

Dose level selected based on daily intake of TiO2 by US children

Not reported

TiO2 nanoparticles pass paracellularly through the regular intestinal epithelium by disrupting tight junctions and localize in tissues beneath these epithelial layers

[46]

 Zhangjian Chen

2015

Sprague Dawley rat model

2, 10 and 50 mg/kg bw/day for 30 or 90 days

Not reported

TEM, ICP-AES, XRD, FTIR spectroscopy, SSA by BET, hydrodynamic diameter (DLS), zeta potential

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Intragastric doses for rats selected based on the daily oral intake of TiO2 nanoparticles for children under the age of 10 years in the US

Not reported

TiO2 nanoparticles alone or in combination with glucose induce liver, kidney and heart injuries as well as changes in white blood cells and red blood cells in young rats. Interactions between TiO2 nanoparticles and glucose was different in different body systems, leading to synergistic or antagonistic effects accordingly

[123]

 Fashui Hong

2015

ICR male mice model

2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg bw/day for 60 days

Not reported (self-synthesized)

TEM, XRD, SSA by BET, hydrodynamic diameter (DLS), zeta potential

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Dose levels were selected based on a report of the World Health Organization from 1969

Not reported

TiO2 nanoparticles cause testicular toxicity, reduced sperm production, and induced sperm lesions in a dose dependent manner. These effects are in close relation to reductions in daily food and water intake, biochemical dysfunctions and oxidative stress

[65]

 Zhangjian Chen

2015

Sprague Dawley rat model

2, 10 and 50 mg/kg bw/day for 30 or 90 days

Not reported

TEM, ICP-AES, XRD, FTIR spectroscopy, SSA by BET, hydrodynamic diameter (DLS), zeta potential

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Intragastric doses for rats selected based on the daily oral intake of TiO2 nanoparticles for children under the age of 10 years in the US

Not reported

Long-term (90 days) daily ingestion of TiO2 nanoparticles can exert mild and temporary cardiovascular toxicity by reduction in heart rate and systolic blood pressure, and increase in diastolic blood pressure

[149]

 Ismael M. Urrutia-Ortega

2016

BALB/c male mice model

5 mg/kg bw for 10 weeks

Food grade TiO2 (E171)

SEM, TEM, Raman spectroscopy, hydrodynamic diameter (NTA), zeta potential

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Intragastric doses justified based on collective exposure to TiO2 from nominal consumption estimates and other sources

Not reported

TiO2 E171 nanoparticles enhance tumor formation in the distal colon of chemical induced colitis-associated cancer (CAC) model of male BALB/c adult mice, marked by increase in CAC tumor progression markers.

[49]

 Hanqing Chen

2017

CD-1 (ICR) male mouse model

2.5 mg/kg bw/day for 7 days

Not reported to be food-grade

TEM, hydrodynamic diameter (DLS), zeta potential

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Oral gavage doses justified based on estimated daily intake of TiO2 and SiO2, and recommendation of OECD for Ag [150]

Not reported

Ag nanoparticles cause colitis-like symptoms in intestinal tract, and changes in gut microbiome. SiO2 nanoparticles cause significant increase in proinflammatory cytokines and microbial species diversity. TiO2 nanoparticles did not induce obvious changes in GIT histology or gut microbiota composition

[124]

 Maria G. Ammendolia

2017

Sprague Dawley rat model

1 and 2 mg/kg bw/day for 5 days

Not reported

TEM, SEM, hydrodynamic diameter (DLS), PdI. SSA and purity (provided by manufacturer)

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Dose levels selected based on the available data on the effects of TiO2 nanomaterials

ICP-MS to measure Ti in gut tissue

Higher dose of TiO2 nanoparticles in male rats causes increase in height and width of villus, and dose-related increase in density of goblet cells. No such effects are seen on female rats. TiO2 nanoparticles penetrate intestinal mucosa (suggested by ICP-MS data)

[125]

 Fashui Hong

2017

ICR male mice model

1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg bw/day for 9 months

Not reported (self-synthesized)

TEM, XRD, SSA by BET, hydrodynamic diameter (DLS) [151]

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Dose levels were selected based on a report of the National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) from 2011 [152]

ICP-MS to measure Ti in gastric tissues

Long term exposure to nano TiO2 results in dysfunction of gastric secretion, inflammation, atrophy, and other lesions of gastric mucosa, which is closely associated with alterations of inflammation responding signal pathways in the stomach.

[100]

 Sarah Bettini

2017

Adult male Wistar rat model

10 mg/kg bw/day for 7 days

Food grade TiO2 (E171)

TEM, TEM-EDX, XANES, hydrodynamic diameter, PdI, zeta potential

TiO2 products prepared following the generic Nanogenotox dispersion protocol [153]

Not reported

TEM-EDX analysis in liver and intestine, and NanoSIMS analysis in Peyer’s Patches

Intragastric food-grade TiO2 administration for one week impairs intestinal immune homeostasis through Th17-driven autoimmune complications. Chronic exposures correlating with the development of an inflammatory microenvironment, may initiate and promote expansion of preneoplastic lesions in the colon.

[50]

Silicon dioxide

 Hanqing Chen

2017

CD-1 (ICR) male mouse model

2.5 mg/kg bw/day for 7 days

Not reported to be food-grade

TEM, hydrodynamic diameter (DLS), zeta potential

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Oral gavage doses justified based on estimated daily intake of TiO2 and SiO2, and recommendation of OECD for Ag [150]

Not reported

Ag nanoparticles cause colitis-like symptoms in intestinal tract, and changes in gut microbiome. SiO2 nanoparticles cause significant increase in proinflammatory cytokines and microbial species diversity. TiO2 nanoparticles did not induce obvious changes in GIT histology or gut microbiota composition

[124]

Zinc oxide

 Vyom Sharma

2012

Swiss albino male mouse model

50 and 300 mg/kg bw

Not reported

DLS and TEM

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Followed OECD guidelines [154]

Not reported

Sub-acute oral exposure to ZnO nanoparticles leads to their accumulation in liver causing oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage and apoptosis

[81]

 Surekha Pasupuleti

2012

Sprague Dawley rat model

5, 50, 300, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw

Not reported

DLS, zeta potential, SEM

Not reported

Followed OECD guidelines [155]

Not reported

Nano-sized ZnO exhibit toxic effects (increased AST and ALT serum levels, microscopic lesions in various organs) at lower doses in comparison to micron-sized ZnO

[79]

 Miri Baek

2012

Sprague Dawley rat model

50, 300 and 2000 mg/kg bw

Not reported

XRD, SEM, TEM, zeta potential

No standard dispersion protocol specified

Not reported

ICP-AES to measure Zn content in tissues

ZnO nanoparticles accumulate in the form of zinc ions in the liver, kidney and lung irrespective of the gender or particle size. Excretion occurs via feces with higher rate of clearance for smaller particles

[117]

 Yanli Wang

2014

Kunming male mice model

 

Not reported

XRD, TEM, XRF, hydrodynamic size (DLS) in water and cell culture medium, zeta potential

Not reported

Dose levels agreed with the European food additives standard and Chinese food additive standard

ICP-MS to measure Zn content in tissues

ZnO nanoparticles, in the presence of Vitamin C, induce significant changes in the TBIL (total bilirubin levels) and BUN (blood urea nitrogen) of liver and kidney, and trigger injury to the main organs

[63]

  1. (alphabetical): ALT Alanine aminotransferase, AST Aspartate aminotransferase, BET Brunauer-Emmett-Teller, DLS Dynamic light scattering, FTIR Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ICP-AES Inductively-coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, ICP-MS Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry, NanoSIMS Nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry, NTA Nanoparticle tracking analysis, OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, SEM Scanning electron microscopy, SSA Specific surface area, TEM Transmission electron microscopy, XANES X-ray absorption near edge structure, XAS X-ray absorption spectroscopy, XPS X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, XRD X-ray diffraction, XRF X-ray fluorescence