Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons on blood hematological and biochemical indicators between two groups

From: Pulmonary effects of exposure to indium and its compounds: cross-sectional survey of exposed workers and experimental findings in rodents

Indicators

Controls (n = 63)

Workers (n = 57)

P

Hematological parameters

RBC (1012/L)

4.90 (4.57–5.04)

5.01 (4.68–5.24)

0.022a

HGB (g/L)

148.00 (137.00–155.00)

156.00 (148.50–162.00)

 < 0.001a

HCT (%)

0.46 (0.43–0.48)

0.48 (0.45–0.49)

0.012a

MCV (fL)

95.10 (92.90–97.20)

95.00 (91.95–97.15)

0.420

MCH (pg)

31.30 (30.50–31.90)

31.40 (30.60–32.10)

0.992

MCHC (g/L)

329.00 (324.00–336.00)

330.00 (326.00–336.50)

0.608

RDW (%)

0.12 (0.119–0.126)

0.12 (0.118–0.125)

0.174

WBC (109/L)

6.80 (6.10–7.80)

6.80 (6.00–7.85)

0.914

LYM%

0.35 (0.30–0.38)

0.34 (0.30–0.37)

0.823

MXD%

0.08 (0.07–0.09)

0.09 (0.08–0.11)

0.003a

NEUT%

0.56 (0.53–0.61)

0.56 (0.52–0.60)

0.891

LYM (109/L)

2.30 (2.00–2.60)

2.20 (1.95–2.60)

0.788

MXD (109/L)

0.60 (0.50–0.80)

0.60 (0.50–0.80)

0.566

NEUT (109/L)

3.80- (3.30–4.70)

4.00 (3.30–4.65)

0.811

PLT (109/L)

206.00 (173.00–249.00)

215.00 (185.00–252.00)

0.614

MPV (fL)

9.50 (8.90–10.20)

9.60 (8.95–10.25)

0.931

PDW (%)

11.90 (11.00–13.30)

12.10 (11.00–13.50)

0.684

P-LCR

0.22 (0.19–0.28)

0.22 (0.17–0.28)

0.983

Biochemical indicators

TBIL (μmol/L)

12.80 (10.20–17.50)

13.10 (10.30–16.35)

0.817

DBIL (μmol/L)

1.00 (0.80–1.40)

1.00 (0.70–1.20)

0.457

IBIL (μmol/L)

11.80 (9.60–16.10)

12.00 (9.35–15.35)

0.908

GGT (U/L)

25.0 (18.00–35.00)

32.00 (20.00–43.00)

0.068

ALT (U/L)

21.00 (16.00–33.00)

29.00 (21.50–38.00)

0.001a

AST (U/L)

20.00 (17.00–24.00)

22.00 (18.00–30.00)

0.009a

TP (g/L)

73.10 (71.60–75.40)

73.90 (72.00–76.50)

0.252

ALB (g/L)

40.36 (36.35–45.37)

52.14 (44.66–62.77)

 < 0.001a

A/G

2.16 (1.93–2.28)

2.09 (1.88–2.24)

0.264

Serum creatinine (μmol/L)

52.14 (49.46–52.77)

51.71 (46.41–53.57)

0.503

  1. All data were represented as P50 (P25-P75) and P value was calculated by multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, and drinking status
  2. aSignificant difference compared to the control group (P < 0.05)