Comparative absorption, distribution, and excretion of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles after repeated oral administration

  • Wan-Seob Cho1,

    Affiliated with

    • Byeong-Cheol Kang2,

      Affiliated with

      • Jong Kwon Lee3,

        Affiliated with

        • Jayoung Jeong3,

          Affiliated with

          • Jeong-Hwan Che2Email author and

            Affiliated with

            • Seung Hyeok Seok4Email author

              Affiliated with

              Contributed equally
              Particle and Fibre Toxicology201310:9

              DOI: 10.1186/1743-8977-10-9

              Received: 18 October 2012

              Accepted: 15 March 2013

              Published: 26 March 2013



              The in vivo kinetics of nanoparticles is an essential to understand the hazard of nanoparticles. Here, the absorption, distribution, and excretion patterns of titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles following oral administration were evaluated.


              Nanoparticles were orally administered to rats for 13 weeks (7 days/week). Samples of blood, tissues (liver, kidneys, spleen, and brain), urine, and feces were obtained at necropsy. The level of Ti or Zn in each sample was measured using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.


              TiO2 nanoparticles had extremely low absorption, while ZnO nanoparticles had higher absorption and a clear dose-response curve. Tissue distribution data showed that TiO2 nanoparticles were not significantly increased in sampled organs, even in the group receiving the highest dose (1041.5 mg/kg body weight). In contrast, Zn concentrations in the liver and kidney were significantly increased compared with the vehicle control. ZnO nanoparticles in the spleen and brain were minimally increased. Ti concentrations were not significantly increased in the urine, while Zn levels were significantly increased in the urine, again with a clear dose-response curve. Very high concentrations of Ti were detected in the feces, while much less Zn was detected in the feces.


              Compared with TiO2 nanoparticles, ZnO nanoparticles demonstrated higher absorption and more extensive organ distribution when administered orally. The higher absorption of ZnO than TiO2 nanoparticles might be due to the higher dissolution rate in acidic gastric fluid, although more thorough studies are needed.


              TiO2 ZnO Oral administration Absorption Distribution Excretion


              Nanomaterials have been developed for the food industry for uses such as food storage, preventing microbial growth, and as a nutritional ingredient [1, 2]. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) have unique physicochemical properties including a bright white color, ability to block UV light, and antimicrobial activity. TiO2 nanoparticles naturally exist in three different crystalline structures (anatase, rutile and brookite) and have a high refractive index. TiO2 is widely used as a pigment (paint, plastics, and paper), in personal care products (sunscreen and toothpastes), and in food (cream) [3]. The bright white color of micron-sized TiO2 might be more useful for some applications than nanosized TiO2 because TiO2 becomes more transparent as its particle size decreases. However, smaller TiO2 particles have higher UV-blocking properties, which can be advantageous for food storage [4]. In addition, nanosized TiO2 prevents microbial growth [5]. Because of these properties, nanosized TiO2 might be popular in the food industry with further technological developments. ZnO is another commonly used particle with similar utility to TiO2. In addition, ZnO is used for its antimicrobial properties and in nutritional supplements such as multivitamins [6, 7]. Compared with micron-sized ZnO, nanosized ZnO might have better UV-blocking and anti-microbial properties and higher bioavailability [8].

              The increased use of these particles might increase the possibility of human exposure through various routes such as inhalation, ingestion, and skin contact. In addition to uses for humans, nanomaterials are used with livestock and in the environment. TiO2 nanoparticles are generally considered to have low toxicity regardless of their size and crystallinity [9]. However, recent in vitro studies have reported that TiO2 nanoparticles are genotoxic through the production of reactive oxygen species [10, 11], although in vitro studies have limited predictive value for in vivo situations. In contrast to TiO2 nanoparticles, ZnO nanoparticles are well known to have high toxicity. One of the mechanisms of this toxicity is their ionization in biological fluids [12].

              Combined with toxicity data, kinetics data can provide the actual concentration of nanoparticles as they interact with biological systems. However, compared with other routes of administration, kinetics data following the oral administration of nanoparticles is limited. Humans have a higher chance of being exposed to TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles in food-related products than other nanoparticles. Therefore, further evaluation of the tissue distribution and absorption of these nanoparticles following oral administration is needed to provide valuable information for assessing the risk of these nanoparticles. We selected TiO2 and ZnO to evaluate nanoparticle absorption, tissue distribution, and excretion following 13 weeks of repeated oral administration.


              Physicochemical characterization of nanoparticles

              TiO2 nanoparticles were spherical and ZnO nanoparticles were hexagonal (Figure  1). Table  1 summarizes the physicochemical properties of the TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles. The primary sizes of TiO2 nanoparticles provided by the manufacturer were similar to those measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS), while ZnO nanoparticles sizes differed significantly by the two measurement type. The hydrodynamic size of the ZnO nanoparticles suggested that ZnO formed small aggregates when dispersed in distilled water (DW). TiO2 nanoparticles had sizes similar to the primary particle size. No particles showed endotoxin contamination. The zeta potential of the TiO2 nanoparticles was 54.4 ± 0.7 mV for pH 2 and 7.9 ± 2.7 mV for pH 8. The zeta potential of ZnO was more negative than TiO2, at 11.7 ± 0.8 mV for pH 2 and -25.1 ± 2.6 mV for pH 8.
              Figure 1

              SEM and TEM of TiO 2 and ZnO nanoparticles. SEM (A) and TEM (B) images of TiO2 nanoparticles show spherical shape. SEM (C) and TEM (D) images of ZnO nanoparticles show hexagonal shape.

              Table 1

              Physicochemical characterization of metal oxide nanoparticles



              Primary size (nm) measured by

              Hydrodynamic size (nm) a

              Surface area (m 2/g) b

              Endotoxin (pg/ml) c




              Anatase 80: 20 Rutile


              26.4 ± 6.1

              37.8 ± 0.4






              89.3 ± 44.7

              201.8 ± 17.2



              ND not detectable. SEM scanning electron microscopy.

              aNanoparticles were dispersed in DW and measured by a dynamic light scattering method.

              bSpecific surface area by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method was provided by the manufacturer.

              cLevels of endotoxin were measured using an Endpoint Chromogenic Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay (Cambrex, MD, USA).

              Durability of nanoparticles under biological conditions

              TiO2 nanoparticles showed minimal dissolution in both acidic gastric fluid (AGF) and pH 7.4 conditions (Figure  2A). However, ZnO nanoparticles dissolved in AGF within five minutes. In basic conditions, ZnO showed minimal dissolution after monitoring for up to 24 h. This dissolution pattern was confirmed by an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Figure  2B).
              Figure 2

              Dissolution pattern of nanoparticles in the acidic gastric fluid. AGF, pH 1.5; basic condition, DW, pH 7.4. Nanoparticles were incubated with AGF or DW for up to 24 h. (A) Image taken 5 min after incubation using a digital camera. (B) Percentage of dissolution measured using an ICP-MS at 24 h after incubation.

              Body weight changes

              When nanoparticles were administered for consecutive 13-week to female Sprague-Dawley rats, the body weight of given a high dose of ZnO nanoparticles was significantly lower than animals given in the vehicle control (Additional file 1: Tables S1–S4). However, other ZnO-treatment groups and the TiO2 nanoparticle-treatment groups showed no significant changes compared with the vehicle-control group.

              Absorption of nanoparticles

              The concentrations of Zn in the blood of the ZnO-treatment groups demonstrated a clear dose-response relationship (Figure  3). However, the concentrations of Ti in the male TiO2-treatment groups showed a less steep slope in the dose-response relationship. Female rats treated with TiO2 showed no dose-response relationship for blood concentration. The Zn blood concentration in the ZnO-treatment groups was almost 10-fold higher than the Ti concentration in the TiO2-treatment groups.
              Figure 3

              Systemic absorption of nanoparticles from the gastrointestinal tract after 13 weeks of repeated oral treatment. Ti concentration in whole blood (A) showed about a 10-fold lower absorption than Zn concentration in whole blood (B) in both sexes. Values are mean ± S.D. and n = 11. Significance versus vehicle control: * p < 0.05.

              Distribution of nanoparticles

              The distribution patterns of Ti and Zn in the liver, spleen, kidney, and brain after 13 weeks of repeated oral administration of TiO2 or ZnO nanoparticles were measured using ICP-MS. Ti concentrations in the TiO2-treatment groups showed no significant increase in the sampled organs compared with the vehicle control group (Figure  4 and Additional file 2: Figure S1). The Zn concentration in the liver and kidney showed a significant increase in the highest dose group with a positive, dose-related trend (Figure  5 and Additional file 2: Figure S2). In addition, the concentration of Zn in liver and kidney was much higher than in the spleen and brain. In spleen and brain tissue, the Zn concentration showed no dose-related response compared with the vehicle control, even in the high-dose group.
              Figure 4

              Concentration of Ti in tissues after 13 weeks of consecutive oral administration of TiO 2 nanoparticles. The concentrations of Ti in the liver (A), spleen (B), kidney (C), and brain (D) were evaluated using an ICP-MS. Values are mean ± S.D. and n = 11. Significance versus vehicle control: * p < 0.05.

              Figure 5

              Concentration of Zn in tissues after 13 weeks of consecutive oral administration of ZnO nanoparticles. The concentrations of Zn in the liver (A), spleen (B), kidney (C), and brain (D) were evaluated using an ICP-MS. Values are mean ± S.D. and n = 11. Significance versus vehicle control: * p < 0.05.

              Excretion of nanoparticles

              The urine concentration of Ti in the TiO2-treatment groups showed no significant differences compared with the control group, which was consistent with the tissue distribution patterns (Figure  6A). In contrast, the concentration of Zn in the urine of ZnO-treatment groups was significantly increased in the middle- and high-dose groups and showed positive trend dose-responses (Figure  6C). Ti or Zn concentrations in the feces were very high compared to concentrations in the urine or tissues, with clear dose responses. These results suggested that most of the nanoparticles were not absorbed from the gastrointestinal lumen (Figures  6B and 6D).
              Figure 6

              Excretion of nanoparticles after 13 weeks of consecutive oral administration. The concentrations of Ti in urine (A) and feces (C) were measured using an ICP-MS for TiO2 treatment groups. The concentrations of Zn in urine (B) and feces (D) were measured using an ICP-MS for ZnO treatment groups. Values are mean ± S.D. and n = 11. Significance versus vehicle control: * p < 0.05.


              TiO2 and ZnO particles are widely used as ingredients and food supplements [3, 6, 7]. As nanotechnology develops, these traditional materials have also been applied in nanoparticulate form. However, nanoparticles interact with biological systems through different mechanisms of action than bulk chemicals [13]. Nanoparticles are considered to be more highly absorbed into the respiratory, skin, and gastrointestinal systems than micron-sized particles because of their unique physicochemical properties, such as their size and surface modifications [14]. For example, instillation of 5 nm fluorescent nanoparticles shows faster translocation to other organs than 27 nm nanoparticles [15]. In addition, a recent study showed that only nanoparticles were translocated into the circulation system when administered into the lung; their absorption rate varied, depending on their surface properties [16]. The uptake of particles into skin cells was observed to be size dependent [17]. When different sizes of polystyrene particles were administered orally to rats, the absorption of 50–100 nm polystyrene nanoparticles was about 250-fold higher than absorption of larger microparticles (500 nm, 1, and 10 μm) [18, 19]. Oral administration of different sizes of colloidal gold particles to mice showed size-dependent absorption [20]. Regarding surface modification, positively charged particles show better absorption than neutral or negatively charged particles [21]. However, in a recent study using gold nanoparticles, negatively charged particles showed higher absorption rates than positively charged particles [22]. Therefore, no general rule can be made about absorption from these results and further studies are needed on the impact of surface modification on gastrointestinal absorption. Studying the kinetics of nanoparticles is an important issue in nanotechnology. Compared with inhalation or skin exposure, the oral intake of nanoparticles in food-related settings has the potential for wide exposure of the public to higher doses and more frequent ingestion [1, 2]. This study focused on the kinetics of the nano-particulate forms of TiO2 and ZnO as representative food-related nanomaterials.

              Both particle types showed very low absorption although the exact absorption rate could not be calculated. The concentration of Ti in the blood samples of rats treated with TiO2 for 13 weeks was 0.4–0.5 μg/g and the differences between the values of the control and high-dose groups were less than 0.1 μg/g. Considering that the dose for the high-dose group was 1041.5 mg/kg body weight, TiO2 nanoparticles might have an extremely low absorption rate, although additional experiments are needed to confirm this. In contrast, the Zn concentration in the blood of rats in the ZnO-treatment groups showed an almost 10-fold higher dose and a steeper dose-response curve than values for animals in the Ti groups. The higher concentration of Zn in blood compared to Ti might be because of the biopersistence of nanoparticles. TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles have different durability under acidic conditions, although both are minimally destructive in basic or physiological conditions. In our previous study, ZnO nanoparticles showed rapid dissolution in acidic conditions (pH 5.5) [12, 23]. Because the pH of the gastric fluid is between 1.5 and 2.0, ZnO nanoparticles administered orally must dissolve in the stomach, with Zn ions then absorbed to enter into systemic circulation. In contrast, the low absorption rate of TiO2 might be because of their low solubility. The low absorption after oral administration of nanoparticles is consistent with the micron-sized biocompatible TiO2 particles [24]. Low absorption would be favorable from a risk perspective, especially in non-nutritional applications of nanoparticles such as in food preparation, handling, storage, and prevention of microbial growth. However, even with marginal absorption, some absorbed nanoparticles might pose a risk based on their toxic potential.

              TiO2 distribution to the liver, spleen, kidney, and brain was also minimal. No dose-response relationship was seen, meaning that the TiO2 particles were not significantly distributed. This low distribution was due to the minimal absorption rate. This result was in contrast with a previous study that observed systemic translocation of TiO2 nanoparticles through the gastrointestinal tract [3]. Therefore, further studies and advanced methods to detect nanoparticles in the tissues are warranted. However, ZnO nanoparticles showed significant levels of Zn in the tested organs, particularly in the liver and kidney, with steep dose-response curves. In a previous study, orally administered ZnO nanoparticles were mainly distributed to the liver and kidney within 72 h following administration [25, 26]. When two different sizes of ZnO were administered, the particle size and gender of animals did not influence the tissue distribution pattern [25]. In addition, orally administered zinc-65 was mainly distributed in the liver, muscle, lung, kidneys, and bone [27].

              Data on the excretion of the nanoparticles were consistent with the absorption and distribution patterns. The Ti concentration in urine showed no significant differences from the controls, while the Zn concentration in urine was significantly higher than the vehicle controls, with clear dose-responses. ZnO nanoparticles administered orally are excreted via the urine [25]. The main routes of elimination of nanoparticles are urine/kidney and bile/liver. Renal excretion was confirmed in several studies using a multi-walled carbon nanotube [28] and quantum dots [29]. However, studies using quantum dots [30, 31] and gold nanoparticles [32] showed long-term accumulation in the organs and no or minimal excretion via urine. The number of nanoparticle elimination study is relatively limited and further studies are warranted.


              Zinc concentrations in blood, organs, and urine were higher than concentrations of titanium when nanoparticles were administered orally for 13 weeks. The kinetics of nanoparticles via oral administration might be influenced by interactions between the physicochemical properties of nanoparticles and the biological milieu with which they come into contact. The low absorption of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles might be favorable, especially for non-nutritional applications. More thorough instigations regarding the impact of physicochemical properties on the kinetics of nanoparticles are warranted.


              Nanoparticles and physicochemical characterization

              Powder-form TiO2 nanoparticles were obtained from ABC Nanotech Co., Ltd. (Daejeon, Korea). Well-dispersed ZnO nanoparticles at 20 wt% in distilled water (DW) were obtained from Nanostructured and Amorphous Materials, Inc. (TX, USA). Primary particle sizes and morphology were measured using scanning electron microscopy (S-3500 N, Hitachi Science Systems, Ltd., Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (LEO-912AB Omega, LEO, Japan). The hydrodynamic size and zeta potential of nanoparticles in DW were measured using a DelsaNano (Beckman Coulter, Inc., CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the optimal concentration of TiO2 and ZnO for measurement was screened by serial dilution under following conditions: temperature 25°C, refractive index 1.33, scattering angle 165°, laser wavelength 632.8 nm. The zeta potential of nanoparticles was measured under acidic conditions (pH 2.0) to simulate acidic gastric conditions, and under basic conditions (pH 8.0) to simulate the small intestine. Levels of endotoxin contamination were measured using an Endpoint Chromogenic Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay (Cambrex, MD, USA).

              Durability of nanoparticles in biological conditions

              TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles were incubated with acidic gastric fluid (AGF, pH 1.5–2.0) or under basic conditions (pH 7.4). AGF was prepared according to a previously described method [33]. Briefly, 2.0 g NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis Mo. USA) and 3.2 g pepsin (Sigma-Aldrich) were dissolved in 1 L of DW and the pH was adjusted to 1.5 using 2 N HCl (Sigma-Aldrich). DW at pH 7.4 was used for the basic solution. Nanoparticles at 5 mg/mL were incubated in solution for up to 24 h. The degree of ionization was evaluated at 24 h post-incubation using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Briefly, at 24 h after incubation in solution, nanoparticle-free supernatants were collected by three rounds of centrifugation at 15000 × g for 30 min. The concentrations of zinc or titanium were measured using ICP-MS (X7; Thermo Elemental, Winsford, UK) as previously described method [34]. Gross images were taken using a digital camera (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

              Animal handling and protocols

              Six-week-old specific-pathogen free Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from OrientBio Ltd. (Seongnam, Korea) and acclimated for seven days after arrival at the study facility. Rodents were housed in an animal room at a controlled temperature (21–24ºC), humidity (45–60%), and light cycle (12 h light/dark). Autoclaved water and gamma-irradiated rodent diets (LabDiet 5002, PMI nutrition, Richmond, USA) were provided ad libitum. The concentration of zinc in the diet was 74 ± 7.1 ppm as provided by the manufacturer (PMI Nutrition, Richmond, USA) and was not detectable in water provided by the Office of Waterworks (Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, Korea). The concentrations of titanium in the diet and water were not known. All animal experiments were performed according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development test guideline (TG 408) and the Good Laboratory Practices for toxicity test guidance (Notification No. 2005-60, Oct. 21, 2005) issued by the Korea Food and Drug Administration. Animal experiment protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University Hospital, Korea.

              Dose-range finding study for 13 weeks of repeated oral nanoparticle administration

              A single-dose acute toxicity study and a 14-day repeated toxicity study of the oral route were performed. For the 14-day study, TiO2 was administered orally at 520.8, 1041.5, and 2083 mg/kg/day, and ZnO was administered at 536.8, 1073.5, and 2147 mg/kg/day. Survival, clinical signs, body weight change, hematological change, serum biochemical change, organ weight, and necropsy findings were evaluated for MTD endpoints. There were no treatment-related findings in the TiO2 study; the highest dose over 13 weeks was selected as 1041.5 mg/kg/day for studying long-term exposure. For ZnO, clinical signs (erection of fur, depression, abdominal inflation, and diarrhea) and a more than 10% reduction of body weight were observed at doses over 1073.5 mg/kg in both sexes. Several hematological parameters and the level of alkaline phosphatase were significantly differed than in the vehicle control (data not shown). Based on these data, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 1041.5 for TiO2 and 536.8 for ZnO nanoparticles.

              13-week repeated oral administration of nanoparticles

              Eleven rats were assigned to each of four treatment groups: vehicle control (DW), ZnO nanoparticles at 134.2, 268.4, and 536.8 mg/kg/day, and TiO2 nanoparticles at 260.4, 520.8, and 1041.5 mg/kg/day. All nanoparticles were suspended in DW at each working concentration and orally administered at 10 ml/kg body weight according to the Handbook of Toxicology, second edition [35]. Administration volume was adjusted based on body weight measured each week. Each group was treated with same concentration of nanoparticles for the entire 13 weeks. Oral administration was done 7 days per week without any anesthesia or starvation. Animals were weighed weekly and observed daily for clinical signs and mortality. Animals were sacrificed and dissected one day after final gavage.

              Absorption, distribution, and excretion of nanoparticles

              Blood was taken via the abdominal vein at necropsy followed by isoflurane euthanization. To evaluate tissue distribution, tissue samples from the liver, spleen, kidney, and brain were obtained and weighed. Nanoparticles excretion was tested in urine and feces. To collect urine and feces, five animals from each group were randomly assigned to a metabolic cage immediately after gavage, and urine and feces samples were collected for 24 h. All samples were analyzed for elemental zinc and titanium to represent ZnO and TiO2 concentrations. ICP-MS was used to analyze zinc and titanium concentrations in samples as previously described [34]. The detection limit of ICP-MS was 0.1–1 ng/L for Ti and 0.1–10 ng/L for Zn.

              Statistical analysis

              ICP-MS data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (JMP ver. 4.0, NC, USA). Animal data were analyzed using TDMS ver 4.0 (KFDA, Osong, Korea). When statistically significant differences were indicated (p < 0.05), a Dunnett’s t-test was employed for comparisons between the control and treatment groups.



              We gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Korea Food and Drug Administration (09152KFDA700, 13182KFDA606) and the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0004090).

              Authors’ Affiliations

              Department of Medicinal Biotechnology, College of Natural Resources and Life Science, Dong-A University
              Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital
              Department of Toxicological Research, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Korea Food and Drug Administration
              Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and Institute of Endemic Disease, Seoul National University College of Medicine


              1. Rashidi L, Khosravi-Darani K: The applications of nanotechnology in food industry. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2011,51(8):723–730. 10.1080/10408391003785417View ArticlePubMed
              2. Chun AL: Will the public swallow nanofood? Nat Nanotechnol 2009,4(12):790–791. 10.1038/nnano.2009.359View ArticlePubMed
              3. Wang J, Zhou G, Chen C, Yu H, Wang T, Ma Y, Jia G, Gao Y, Li B, Sun J: Acute toxicity and biodistribution of different sized titanium dioxide particles in mice after oral administration. Toxicol Lett 2007,168(2):176–185. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.12.001View ArticlePubMed
              4. Lin CC, Lin WJ: Sun protection factor analysis of sunscreens containing titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J Food Drug Anal 2011,19(1):1–8.
              5. Ge Y, Schimel JP, Holden PA: Identification of soil bacteria susceptible to TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012,78(18):6749–6758. 10.1128/AEM.00941-12PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
              6. Wiking L, Larsen T, Sehested J: Transfer of dietary zinc and fat to milk–evaluation of milk fat quality, milk fat precursors, and mastitis indicators. J Dairy Sci 2008,91(4):1544–1551. 10.3168/jds.2007-0716View ArticlePubMed
              7. Rincker MJ, Hill GM, Link JE, Meyer AM, Rowntree JE: Effects of dietary zinc and iron supplementation on mineral excretion, body composition, and mineral status of nursery pigs. J Anim Sci 2005,83(12):2762–2774.PubMed
              8. Teow Y, Asharani PV, Hande MP, Valiyaveettil S: Health impact and safety of engineered nanomaterials. Chem Commun (Camb) 2011,47(25):7025–7038. 10.1039/c0cc05271jView Article
              9. Rushton EK, Jiang J, Leonard SS, Eberly S, Castranova V, Biswas P, Elder A, Han X, Gelein R, Finkelstein J: Concept of assessing nanoparticle hazards considering nanoparticle dosemetric and chemical/biological response metrics. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2010,73(5):445–461. 10.1080/15287390903489422View ArticlePubMed
              10. Bhattacharya K, Davoren M, Boertz J, Schins RP, Hoffmann E, Dopp E: Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and DNA-adduct formation but not DNA-breakage in human lung cells. Part Fibre Toxicol 2009, 6: 17. 10.1186/1743-8977-6-17PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
              11. Kermanizadeh A, Gaiser BK, Hutchison GR, Stone V: An in vitro liver model - assessing oxidative stress and genotoxicity following exposure of hepatocytes to a panel of engineered nanomaterials. Part Fibre Toxicol 2012,9(1):28. 10.1186/1743-8977-9-28PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
              12. Cho WS, Duffin R, Howie SE, Scotton CJ, Wallace WA, Macnee W, Bradley M, Megson IL, Donaldson K: Progressive severe lung injury by zinc oxide nanoparticles; the role of Zn2+ dissolution inside lysosomes. Part Fibre Toxicol 2011,8(1):27. 10.1186/1743-8977-8-27PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
              13. Oberdorster G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J: Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 2005,113(7):823–839. 10.1289/ehp.7339PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
              14. Fubini B, Ghiazza M, Fenoglio I: Physico-chemical features of engineered nanoparticles relevant to their toxicity. Nanotoxicology 2010, 4: 347–363. 10.3109/17435390.2010.509519View ArticlePubMed
              15. Choi HS, Ashitate Y, Lee JH, Kim SH, Matsui A, Insin N, Bawendi MG, Semmler-Behnke M, Frangioni JV, Tsuda A: Rapid translocation of nanoparticles from the lung airspaces to the body. Nat Biotechnol 2010,28(12):1300–1303. 10.1038/nbt.1696PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
              16. Kreyling WG, Semmler-Behnke M, Takenaka S, Moller W: Differences in the Biokinetics of Inhaled Nano- versus Micrometer-Sized Particles. Acc Chem Res in press
              17. Rancan F, Gao Q, Graf C, Troppens S, Hadam S, Hackbarth S, Kembuan C, Blume-Peytavi U, Ruhl E, Lademann J: Skin penetration and cellular uptake of amorphous silica nanoparticles with variable size, surface functionalization, and colloidal stability. ACS Nano 2012,6(8):6829–6842. 10.1021/nn301622hView ArticlePubMed
              18. Jani P, Halbert GW, Langridge J, Florence AT: The uptake and translocation of latex nanospheres and microspheres after oral administration to rats. J Pharm Pharmacol 1989,41(12):809–812. 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1989.tb06377.xView ArticlePubMed
              19. Jani P, Halbert GW, Langridge J, Florence AT: Nanoparticle uptake by the rat gastrointestinal mucosa: quantitation and particle size dependency. J Pharm Pharmacol 1990,42(12):821–826. 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1990.tb07033.xView ArticlePubMed
              20. Hillyer JF, Albrecht RM: Gastrointestinal persorption and tissue distribution of differently sized colloidal gold nanoparticles. J Pharm Sci 2001,90(12):1927–1936. 10.1002/jps.1143View ArticlePubMed
              21. Florence AT: Nanoparticle uptake by the oral route: fulfilling its potential? Drug Discovery Today: Technologies 2005,2(1):75–81. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2005.05.019View ArticlePubMed
              22. Schleh C, Semmler-Behnke M, Lipka J, Wenk A, Hirn S, Schaffler M, Schmid G, Simon U, Kreyling WG: Size and surface charge of gold nanoparticles determine absorption across intestinal barriers and accumulation in secondary target organs after oral administration. Nanotoxicology 2012,6(1):36–46. 10.3109/17435390.2011.552811PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
              23. Cho WS, Duffin R, Thielbeer F, Bradley M, Megson IL, Macnee W, Poland CA, Tran CL, Donaldson K: Zeta potential and solubility to toxic ions as mechanisms of lung inflammation caused by metal/metal oxide nanoparticles. Toxicol Sci 2012,126(2):469–477. 10.1093/toxsci/kfs006View ArticlePubMed
              24. Abe S, Koyama C, Esaki M, Akasaka T, Uo M, Kuboki Y, Morita M, Watari F: In vivo internal diffusion of several inorganic microparticles through oral administration. Bio-Med Mater Eng 2009,19(2–3):221–229.
              25. Baek M, Chung HE, Yu J, Lee JA, Kim TH, Oh JM, Lee WJ, Paek SM, Lee JK, Jeong J: Pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, and excretion of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 2012, 7: 3081–3097.PubMed CentralPubMed
              26. Lee CM, Jeong HJ, Yun KN, Kim DW, Sohn MH, Lee JK, Jeong J, Lim ST: Optical imaging to trace near infrared fluorescent zinc oxide nanoparticles following oral exposure. Int J Nanomedicine 2012, 7: 3203–3209.PubMed CentralPubMed
              27. He LS, Yan XS, Wu DC: Age-dependent variation of zinc-65 metabolism in LACA mice. Int J Radiat Biol 1991,60(6):907–916.View ArticlePubMed
              28. Lacerda L, Soundararajan A, Singh R, Pastorin G, Al-Jamal KT, Turton J, Frederik P, Herrero MA, Li S, Bao A: Dynamic imaging of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube systemic circulation and urinary excretion. Adv Mater 2008,20(2):225–230. 10.1002/adma.200702334View Article
              29. Choi HS, Liu W, Misra P, Tanaka E, Zimmer JP, Itty Ipe B, Bawendi MG, Frangioni JV: Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol 2007,25(10):1165–1170. 10.1038/nbt1340PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
              30. Fischer HC, Liu L, Pang KS, Chan WCW: Pharmacokinetics of nanoscale quantum dots: in vivo distribution, sequestration, and clearance in the rat. Adv Funct Mater 2006,16(10):1299–1305. 10.1002/adfm.200500529View Article
              31. Yang RS, Chang LW, Wu JP, Tsai MH, Wang HJ, Kuo YC, Yeh TK, Yang CS, Lin P: Persistent tissue kinetics and redistribution of nanoparticles, quantum dot 705, in mice: ICP-MS quantitative assessment. Environ Health Perspect 2007,115(9):1339–1343. 10.1289/ehp.10290PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
              32. Cho WS, Cho M, Jeong J, Choi M, Cho HY, Han BS, Kim SH, Kim HO, Lim YT, Chung BH: Acute toxicity and pharmacokinetics of 13 nm-sized PEG-coated gold nanoparticles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2009,236(1):16–24. 10.1016/j.taap.2008.12.023View ArticlePubMed
              33. Wurster DE, Burke GM, Berg MJ, Veng-Pedersen P, Schottelius DD: Phenobarbital adsorption from simulated intestinal fluid, U.S.P., and simulated gastric fluid, U.S.P., by two activated charcoals. Pharm Res 1988,5(3):183–186. 10.1023/A:1015969008019View ArticlePubMed
              34. Cho WS, Cho M, Jeong J, Choi M, Han BS, Shin HS, Hong J, Chung BH, Cho MH: Size-dependent tissue kinetics of PEG-coated gold nanoparticles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010,245(1):116–123. 10.1016/j.taap.2010.02.013View ArticlePubMed
              35. Derelanko MJ, Hollinger MA: Handbook of toxicology . 2nd edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001.


              © Cho et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

              This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.