Open Access

Erratum to: Silica coating influences the corona and biokinetics of cerium oxide nanoparticles

  • Nagarjun V. Konduru1,
  • Renato J. Jimenez1,
  • Archana Swami1,
  • Sherri Friend2,
  • Vincent Castranova3,
  • Philip Demokritou1,
  • Joseph D. Brain1 and
  • Ramon M. Molina1Email author
Particle and Fibre Toxicology201613:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0146-4

Received: 16 June 2016

Accepted: 16 June 2016

Published: 22 June 2016

The original article was published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2015 12:31

After the publication of this work [1] it was noticed that the values in Tables 4 and 5 were incorrect. The numbers should have been all multiplied by 10.
Table 4

Cerium concentration in different tissues at 2 hours after intravenous injection of uncoated or silica-coated CeO2 NPs

 

CeO2

Silica-coated CeO2

 

ng/g ± SE

ng/g ± SE

Lungs

143.7 ± 17.9

546.2 ± 49.3*

Liver

19517.9 ± 444.9

16636.8 ± 676.7*

Bone

33.8 ± 4.4

64.2 ± 11.4*

Cecum

6.2 ± 4.3

2.1 ± 0.3

Large intestine

3.6 ± 0.9

2.8 ± 0.5

Bone marrow

17.3 ± 3.4

467 ± 7.0*

Spleen

16807.1 ± 3579.1

12043.8 ± 1717.6

Stomach

37.7 ± 16.7

47.7 ± 23.8

Kidneys

30.9 ± 14.4

52.7 ± 2.9

Small intestine

13.7 ± 2.0

11.2 ± 1.4

Heart

7.7 ± 1.5

14.1 ± 2.6

Testes

0.9 ± 0.2

1.9 ± 0.1*

Skeletal muscle

1.6 ± 0.5

2.3 ± 0.1

Brain

0.4 ± 0.0

1.1 ± 0.2*

Skin

2.0 ± 0.3

6.8 ± 0.4*

Plasma

1.4 ± 0.3

1.4 ± 0.3

RBC

26.6 ± 5.1

20.7 ± 2.3

Data are mean ± SE ng/g cerium concentration, n = 5/group

Ce concentration was estimated (ng/μCiNPs x μCi/gtissue)

*P < 0.05, CeO2 vs. silica-coated CeO2

Table 5

Cerium concentration in different tissues at 2 days after intravenous injection of uncoated or silica-coated CeO2 NPs

 

CeO2

Silica-coated CeO2

 

ng/g ± SE

ng/g ± SE

Lungs

56.5 ± 15.3

231.5 ± 28.3*

Liver

19044.3 ± 932.2

16525.7 ± 380.7*

Bone

27.2 ± 6.4

109.5 ± 16.1*

Cecum

1.5 ± 0.2

9.5 ± 2.6*

Large intestine

2.1 ± 0.3

10.7 ± 2.9*

Bone marrow

14.2 ± 2.8

66.4 ± 12.3*

Spleen

10960.2 ± 3334.9

18223.3 ± 1818.3

Stomach

20.1 ± 8.9

32.9 ± 12.5

Kidneys

13.2 ± 1.8

63.2 ± 5.8*

Small intestine

14.7 ± 1.4

6.3 ± 1.2*

Heart

7.5 ± 2.6

10.5 ± 1.2

Testes

0.2 ± 0.1

2.0 ± 0.2*

Skeletal muscle

0.5 ± 0.1

1.8 ± 0.2*

Brain

0.2 ± 0.1

0.8 ± 0.2*

Skin

1.9 ± 0.3

5.2 ± 0.8*

Plasma

0.2 ± 0.1

0.9 ± 0.2*

RBC

3.0 ± 1.0

6.9 ± 0.3*

Data are mean ± SE ng/g cerium concentration, n = 5/group

Ce concentration was estimated (ng/μCiNPs x μCi/gtissue)

*P < 0.05, CeO2 vs. silica-coated CeO2

Please see below corrected tables 4 and 5.

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Molecular and Integrative Physiological Sciences Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
(2)
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(3)
Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University

Reference

  1. Konduru NV, Jimenez RJ, Swami A, Friend S, Castranova V, Demokritou P, et al. Silica coating influences the corona and biokinetics of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2015;12:31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement