Skip to main content

Effects of PM2.5 and gases exposure during prenatal and early-life on autism–like phenotypes in male rat offspring

Abstract

Background

Epidemiological studies have reported associations between elevated air pollution and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, we hypothesized that exposure to air pollution that mimics real world scenarios, is a potential contributor to ASD. The exact etiology and molecular mechanisms underlying ASD are not well understood. Thus, we assessed whether changes in OXTR levels may be part of the mechanism linking PM2.5/gaseous pollutant exposure and ASD. The current in-vivo study investigated the effect of exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and gaseous pollutants on ASD using behavioral and molecular experiments. Four exposure groups of Wistar rats were included in this study: 1) particulate matter and gaseous pollutants exposed (PGE), 2) gaseous pollutants only exposed (GE), 3) autism-like model (ALM) with VPA induction, and 4) clean air exposed (CAE) as the control. Pregnant dams and male pups were exposed to air pollutants from embryonic day (E0) to postnatal day (PND21).

Results

The average ± SD concentrations of air pollutants were: PM2.5: 43.8 ± 21.1 μg/m3, CO: 13.5 ± 2.5 ppm, NO2: 0.341 ± 0.100 ppm, SO2: 0.275 ± 0.07 ppm, and O3: 0.135 ± 0.01 ppm. The OXTR protein level, catalase activity (CAT), and GSH concentrations in the ALM, PGE, and GE rats were lower than those in control group (CAE). However, the decrements in the GE rats were smaller than other groups. Also in behavioral assessments, the ALM, PGE, and GE rats demonstrated a repetitive /restricted behavior and poor social interaction, but the GE rats had weaker responses compared to other groups of rats. The PGE and GE rats showed similar trends in these tests compared to the VPA rats.

Conclusions

This study suggested that exposure to ambient air pollution contributed to ASD and that OXTR protein may serve as part of the mechanism linking them.

Background

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a pervasive neurodevelopmental disorder recognized by social communication deficits and restricted/repetitive patterns of behavior [1]. It is estimated that the global prevalence of ASD is 1 in 132 persons [2] and the prevalence rate is still increasing [3]. The prevalence of ASD is four to five times higher in males than females [4]. ASD has attracted public attention because of its high social costs and substantial impacts on society [5]. Although genetics likely plays an important role in ASD, environmental exposures to pollutants particularly during the early life periods could be another potential risk factor [6, 7]. Environmental factors such as exposure to air pollution may contribute to ASD etiology [8,9,10].

Previous studies point to a biological pathway linked to autism through a systemic inflammatory response that can affect the development of the central nervous system [9]. Developmental exposure to traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) has been associated with increased ASD risk [11]. Environment exposures during perinatal and postnatal periods may be crucial in ADS since brain development takes place in these periods, and exposure to environmental chemicals may cause neurodevelopmental disorders [12, 13].

Limited prior animal studies also suggested a connection between exposure to air pollution and ASD [14]. Most of these studies exposed rats or mice to high concentrations of air pollution. For instance, in a study was conducted by Li et al. (2018), rats were exposed to PM2.5 with doses of 2 or 20 mg/kg body weight per day [9], and reported that both groups of exposed rats showed typical behavioral features of autism. In another study, mice developmentally exposed to high concentrations of diesel exhaust particles exhibited altered behavioral phenotypes including effects on locomotor activity and repetitive behaviors [15].

It has been suggested that airborne particulate matter may act like a Trojan horse [16] and represents an effective delivery system for diverse environmental toxicants to reach the brain. Additionally, associated water soluble compounds may provide a toxic stimulus independent of the particle composition itself and may be transported to the brain by the circulation system [17]. The toxicity of particulate matter in the lung have been linked to both the particulate constituents including metallic elements, oxidants, and oxidant forming species [18, 19] and the physical characteristic of particles itself [20]. Many compounds present in the particulate matter are neurotoxic [19]. For example, environmental exposure to neurotoxicants such as iron (Fe), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), aluminum (Al), zinc (Zn), and lead (Pb) can induce oxidative stress [21, 22], and the brain is vulnerable to oxidative stress due to its great metabolic activity and low levels of antioxidants such as catalase (CAT) [23]. Previous studies have suggested that autism could result from the interaction between genetic and environmental factors with oxidative stress as the link between them [24]. Disturbing redox signaling, imbalance in the cellular redox state towards the pro-oxidant status, oxidative stress, and the resulting systemic inflammation are a possible mechanism of air pollution induced autism [25]. In addition, oxidative modification can modulate activity of several proteins that have relevant roles in normal brain function. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a crucial role in cell signaling. Oxidative stress also plays a role in controlling the activities of receptor proteins [26].

Extensive research has established the possible ability of the hypothalamic neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) to modulate social behaviors across species including humans [27]. Results from the animal studies led to examination of the effects of OXT administration to humans and investigations of the etiology and treatment of psychiatric disorders, especially ASD [28]. Because social behavior symptoms are a clear manifestation of this disorder, the OXT system has been implicated in the biology of ASD, and has become a promising treatment option for the social symptoms of ASD. Increased research efforts into the potential involvement of OXT and its receptor (OXTR) in ASD include genetic studies, analysis of OXT levels in biological fluids and the assessments of OXT treatment in humans [29]. However, recent evidence investigating and implicating the role of OXTR protein in ASD has been increasing [29].

Epidemiological studies suggest an association between elevated air pollution and ASD. Since the effects of lower concentration of air pollution (that reflect the real world) on autism spectrum disorder is poorly understood. Hence we hypothesized exposure to ambient air pollution is a potential contributor to ASD. Previous studies have reported that simultaneous exposure to particulate matter and gaseous pollutants during pregnancy have been associated with ASD [30]. However, there is limited evidence showing a relationship between only gaseous pollutants exposure and ASD. Therefore, we investigated the effect of gaseous pollutant only exposures on ASD. Studies on rodents have found that prenatal exposure to VPA induces an animal model of ASD showing similar structural, functional, and behavioral features to human autistic patients [31,32,33]. Hence we compared the effects of the air pollution to that of VPA in rats. In the present study, we investigated the effects of prenatal and early life PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants (NO2, CO, O3, SO2) exposure on a battery of behavioral dimensions, OXTR protein expression, and antioxidants (CAT) enzymatic activity and GSH concentration in the brain. Since the precise etiology of ASD remains poorly understood [34]., we assessed whether changes in OXTR levels may serve as part of the mechanism linking PM2.5/gaseous pollutants and ASD.

Results

The concentration of PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants

The average concentration of PM2.5 in the exposure period (E0 until PND22) was 43.82 ± 21.12 μg/m3. The average concentrations of CO, NO2, SO2 and O3 were 13.5 ± 2.5 ppm, 0.341 ± 0.100 ppm, 0.275 ± 0.07 ppm, and 0.135 ± 0.010 ppm, respectively. The concentrations of gases in both chambers one and two were equal. Control group of rats were exposed to clean air with these characteristics: PM2.5 < 5 μg/m3, SO2 < 0.02 ppm, NO2 < 0.04 ppm, CO < 2.4 ppm, and O3 < 0.02 ppm.

The concentration of metals and PAHs

Concentrations of PM2.5-bounded heavy metals were determined, and the mean values can ordered as follow: Ca > Al > Na > Cu > Fe > Cd > Cr > Ni > Pb > Zn > Mn > As>V (Additional file 1: Table S1). The mean total concentration of 16 PAHs was 45.88 ± 21.02 ng/m3 (Additional file 1: Table S2). The order of average concentrations of the observed PAHs was phenanthrene> naphtalene> benzo(k)fluoranthene> florene> pyrene> anthracene> acenaphtylen> benzo(b)fluoranthene> chrysene> fluorantene> benzo(a) anthracene > acenaphten> dibenzo(a,h)anthracene> benzo (g,h,i)perylene> benzo(a)p- yrene> indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene.

Open field

The open field test assesses locomotor activity and exploratory drive (23). To directly assess whether prenatal and early life exposures in the PGE and GE rats alter motor activity, the rats were assessed for locomotor activity (Fig. 1). There were no significant differences among the exposed rats and controls in total distance travelled and velocity.

Fig. 1
figure1

Open field test; PGE and GE rats showed no differences in locomotor behaviors. Prenatal exposure of PGE and GE rats did not affect: a distance travelled and b velocity in the open field task when compared to CAE control rats. (one-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s multiple comparisons). Number of rats per group: CAE = 8, GE = 13, PGE = 8, ALM = 8

Social preference test

The main aim of this study was to assess whether prenatal and early life air pollution exposure could induce autistic traits in PGE and GE rats. To eliminate possible confounding, we set a control group (CAE rats) to distinguish between the effects of PM2.5 and gasses exposure (PGE rats) and gaseous exposure (GE rats) on the behavioral outcomes of pups. We also created an autism-like model by injecting doses of VPA to produce ALM rats, and compare these animals to the other exposure groups.

The first session of the social preference test allowed estimation of the social affiliation and motivation of subject rat. Typically, a wild type animal will spend a significant amount of time in the compartment with the stranger compared to the compartment with empty cup. Such behavior indicates normal sociability, social motivation, and affiliation [35, 36]. In the sociability session of the test, every group demonstrated a significant preference for spending time in the chamber containing stranger1 compared to the empty chamber. The time that the ALM rats spent in the chamber containing the stranger1 was significantly lower than that for the GE rats (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2
figure2

Three Chambered Social Preference Test. a In the sociability phase of the three chambered social preference test, sociability was assessed by measuring the cumulative time spent by the test rat in chamber containing the stranger1 vs. empty cup. There were no differences among the CAE, GE, PGE, and ALM rats in exhibiting preference toward stranger1over the empty setup (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 Two-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s test for the multiple comparisons). b In the social novelty test, the cumulative times spent by a test rat in the chamber containing stranger2 vs. stranger1 were compared. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 Two-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s test for the multiple comparisons). Number of rats per group: CAE = 10, GE = 11, PGE = 9, ALM = 8

The second session of the test estimated social novelty and social memory. The ability to differentiate social novelty was determined by measuring time spent in the chamber containing stranger2 compared to the time spent in the chamber containing stranger1 that is now the familiar rat. The ALM and PGE rats showed no preference between the stranger2 and stranger1 rats. The time spent by ALM rats in the chamber containing stranger2 was significantly lower than that for the PGE rats (Fig. 2b).

Y-maze

We assessed spontaneous alternation in the Y-maze to analyze respective behavior and /or working memory. Spontaneous alternation in a Y- maze represents a common exploratory strategy and repetitive behavior [33, 37]. The Y-maze labyrinth is a hippocampus dependent task of the spatial working memory. A decrease in the percentage of alternation in this test was detected in ALM, PGE, and GE rats, comparing to CAE rats (Fig. 3). The reduction in alternation in the Y-maze test also indicated restricted behavioral patterns (another core of ASD), in ALM, PGE, and GE rats [38].

Fig. 3
figure3

Y maze; a strong decrease in the percentage of alternation was detected in ALM, PGE, and GE rats. Error bars represent the SEM. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 one-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s multiple comparisons. Number of rats per group: CAE = 9, GE = 10, PGE = 8, ALM = 13

Marble burying

Repetitive behavior was assessed by the marble burying test. The ALM and PGE rats buried more marbles than the CAE rats (Fig. 4a). For all the affected rats (ALM, PGE, and GE), the duration of exploration decreased vs CAE rats (Fig. 4b). For all the affected rats (ALM, PGE, and GE), there were increasing trends in the interaction time with the marbles compared to CAE rats although the difference was not significant (Fig. 4c). In this test, the frequency of self- grooming events and repetitive digging behavior were quantified. For the PGE and GE rats, the duration of self–grooming increased compared to the CAE rats (Fig. 4d) and the duration of digging in the ALM rats increased vs the CAE rats (Fig. 4e).

Fig. 4
figure4

Marble burying test; a ALM and PGE rats buried more marbles vs CAE rats. However, GE rats buried less marbles than ALM rats. (*p < 0.05;* < 0.01one-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s multiple comparisons) b GE,PGE and ALM rats spent less time in exploring in plexiglas test cage.(*p < 0.05;* < 0.01one-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s multiple comparisons) c ALM,PGE and GE rats spent more time in interacting with marbles vs CAE group, but this increasing trend is not statistically significant.(one-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s multiple comparisons) d GE and PGE rats spent more time in self-grooming as a repetitive behavior vs CAE group.(*p < 0.05;* < 0.01one-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s multiple comparisons) e ALM rats spent more time in digging behavior vs CAE group,and also there is a trend of increasing digging behavior in PGE rats vs CAE group,but this is not statistically significant. Error bars represent the SEM. (*p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s multiple comparisons). Number of rats per group: CAE = 8, GE = 8, PGE = 8, ALM = 10

Oxidative stress

Oxidative stress was assessed by measuring the antioxidant enzymes i.e. catalase (CAT) and GSH in prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, and cerebellum of the excised brain tissue. Overall, the CAT activity decreased significantly in all brain regions of the PGE rats that were tested compared to the CAE rats as a control (Fig. 5a). Although, the CAT activity in ALM rats did not significantly decrease vs CAE rats in amygdala and prefrontal cortex, this result may be due to an increased level of ROS-mediated cell damage, specifically ·OH that could result in an increase of CAT activity to maintain redox homoeostasis (Fig. 5. a, d) [25]. A significant decrease of CAT activity in the cerebellum was observed in the ALM and PGE rats compared to the CAE rats (Fig. 5b). The PGE, GE, and ALM rats exhibited significantly decreased CAT activity in hippocampus compared to the CAE rats (Fig. 5c). Thus, in the cerebellum, and amygdala, the activity of CAT activity was relatively similar to that in the PGE and GE rats vs CAE rats. The PGE and GE rats showed significantly decreased CAT activity in the prefrontal cortex compared to the CAE rats (Fig. 5d).

Fig. 5
figure5

Catalase enzyme activity after prenatal and early life exposure of the CAE, GE, PGE, and ALM rats in the a amygdala (N = 3, Two times repetition), b cerebellum (N = 6, Three times repetition), c hippocampus (N = 6, Three times repetition), and d prefrontal cortex (N = 6, Three times repetition). The error bars represent the SEM. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s multiple comparisons)

As illustrated in Fig. 6, the PGE and ALM rats exhibited decreased levels of GSH in the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus and cerebellum compared to the CAE group. The PGE, GE, and ALM rats showed significantly decreased levels of GSH in the amygdala and cerebellum (Fig. 6. a, b). Unlike the GE group, the ALM and PGE rats showed significantly decreased levels of GSH in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (Fig. 6. c, d).

Fig. 6
figure6

GSH levels after prenatal and early–life exposure of the CAE, GE, PGE, and ALM rats in the a amygdala (N = 3, Two times repetition), b cerebellum (N = 6, Three times repetition), c hippocampus (N = 6, Three times repetition), and d prefrontal cortex (N = 6, Three times repetition). The error bars represent the SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s multiple comparisons)

Expression of oxytocin receptor

Western blot tests were conducted to determine the OXTR protein expression level. The ALM, PGE, and GE rats exhibited significantly decreased OXTR levels in the amygdala, cerebellum, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex compared to the CAE rats (Fig. 7 a, b, c, d). These results indicate that the exposed rats showed the values similar to the autism-like model rats.

Fig. 7
figure7

OXTR levels after prenatal and early–life exposure of the CAE, GE, PGE, and ALM rats in the a amygdala (N = 4, Three times repetition), b cerebellum (N = 4, Three times repetition), c hippocampus (N = 4, Three times repetition), and d prefrontal cortex (N = 4, Three times repetition). Error bars represent the SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey ̉s multiple comparisons)

Discussion

In this study, several groups of rats were exposed to ambient air pollution without any modifications during the period of E0 to PND21 covering the main neurodevelopmental events. As a result, the PGE, GE and ALM group of rats demonstrated decreased OXTR protein levels, reduced catalase activity and GSH concentration compared to the CAE group of rats (as a control group). However, the decrements in the GE rats were smaller than other symptomatic rats group. The PGE and GE rats showed similar results for these endpoints compared to the VPA rats. However, the GE rats showed smaller decrements in these measures.

The immature brains of fetuses or toddlers are more susceptible for environmental toxicants because the baby’s brain weight at birth is about 24% of its adult weight and the nerve cells are not fully developed until around the age of 2 years old. The developing nervous system is sensitive to environmental toxicants because temporal and regional developmental processes i.e., proliferation, migration, differentiation, synaptogenesis, myelination and apoptosis, grow during this period. During this vulnerable period, a wide range of chemicals may interfere with one or more of these processes through inhalation. The susceptible portion of the neurodevelopmental period in a rat are E0 to PND21 [12].

The immature rat’s vulnerability to environmental toxins may be related not only to the neurodevelopmental stages but also to the failure of other protective barriers e.g., the placental barrier and the blood brain barrier. The placental barrier should protect the fetus against the passage of the harmful substances like environmental toxins from the mother’s body. However, the placenta is not an effective protective barrier against environmental toxins during this time of extreme fetal vulnerability [39]. Although previous studies have described the associations between prenatal ambient air pollution exposure and impaired birth outcomes [40], it remains uncertain exactly what adverse effects are induced in the fetus. Various potential mechanism have been proposed including both direct particle translocation and/or through indirect mechanism such as intrauterine inflammation [41,42,43]. In recent years, studies were conducted showing that only nano-sized particles can pass the placental barrier [44, 45]. However, a recent study [46] found that black carbon particles were able to translocate from the mother’s lungs to the placenta. An indirect mechanism may also be involved since the exposure to particulate air pollution and its constituents e.g. PAHs and metals, can induce oxidative stress and inflammation that leads to developmental toxicity and adverse health outcomes [47, 48] by negatively affecting placental transport [49].

The aim of this study was to use ambient air pollution concentrations without any modification to mimic real world exposure scenarios. Since prior studies typically used high exposures, it is not clear that exposure at commonly observed air pollution concentrations can induce ASD or not. Comparing the internal dose of PM2.5 per kg body weight indicates that rat’s dose in our study is about 2–3 times higher than the equivalent human dose. However, these results rely on more realistic exposures compared to prior studies.

In the present study, the concentrations of PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants, along with the concentration of heavy metals and PAHs bounded to the PM2.5 were determined. A recent study conducted by Zarandi et al. [50] in Tehran found higher concentrations of metals than our study, possibly due to the different sampling periods. Lead, zinc, manganese, benzo(a) anthracene, benzo(k) fluoranthene, benzo(a) pyrene, and pyrene in PM2.5 particles may have neurotoxic potential, because these toxicants have been associated with the production of ROS [51,52,53]. While the PM2.5 and components bound to it are likely candidate for inducing autism-like phenotype, it is possible that gaseous pollutants particularly nitrogen oxides contribute to induce ASD [14, 54]. Since the diagnosis of ASD is based mainly on behavioral phenotypes, behavioral assessments based on the clinical symptoms in humans were used to detect ASD in rodent models [55, 56]. Therefore, we performed behavioral tests to support the important characteristics of the ASD i.e. deficit in social interaction and increase in restricted/repetitive behaviors.

To assess the sociability domain, a three chamber social experiment was conducted. Exposure to PM2.5 and gaseous pollutant did not affect sociability in social preference test. However, during the social novelty phase, the ALM and PGE rats showed no preference when presented to the novel and familiar rats, suggesting the inability to differentiate social novelty that has been reported to be an autism-like behavior [14, 57]. Our findings in this test were also in agreement with the studies of Li et al. [9] and Church et al. [58] that showed an inability to differentiate social novelty.

To assess the spontaneous working memory and repetitive behavior, the Y-maze test was conducted. The results of Y-maze test showed decreased percentages of spontaneous alternation behaviors and consequently memory defects in the PGE, GE, and ALM rats compared to the CAE rats. The reduction of alternation in the Y-maze test could also indicate a restricted behavioral pattern [38].

The marble burying test was used to assess repetitive behaviors in rodent models of autism as well as in models of obsessive-compulsive behavior. In the marble burying test, evenly spaced marbles served as a proxy for repetitive digging behavior. Increased repetitive digging results in more marbles being buried. Our results showed that the number of marbles buried and the digging time of the PGE rats was greater than those in the CAE rats, suggesting increased repetitive behaviors [33]. In contrast to our observations, PM2.5-exposed rats in another study barely buried the marbles, indicating no increase in repetitive behaviors [9].

The open field test showed that there were no differences between the PGE, GE, and even the ALM rats with the control rats (CAE) in motor activity. Our findings are in agreement with two recent studies by Chang et al. [14] and Church et al. [58]. Previous studies had suggested that the oxidative stress due to the biological enzyme activity caused by exposure to PM2.5 drives such behavioral changes [59].

The role of oxidative stress in inducing autism may be through an imbalance between the generation of ROS and the defense mechanisms against ROS by antioxidants. GSH plays an important role in several cellular process such as apoptosis, and is also involved in the anti-ROS defense system. GSH is the most important antioxidant for detoxification and elimination of environmental toxins [60]. Therefore, GSH destruction can increase susceptibility to oxidative stress. GSH acts as a proton donor, neutralizes H2O2, reacts directly with radical species, and also contributes to regeneration of other antioxidants [61]. Catalase protects cells from oxidative stress by catalyzing the rapid decomposition of H2O2 through two types of reactions depending on its peroxidation and catalytic activities [62]. CAT is also involved in the recycling of the cellular H2O2 [25].

Our findings showed decreased levels of GSH and CAT in the exposed groups of rats compared to the control rats. This result is similar to the observations by James et al. [63] and by Zoroglu et al. [64] that showed reduced levels of GSH and CAT in autistic patients, respectively.

Due to the complexity of symptoms seen in autism, different areas of the brain are likely to be involved in ASD. Among them, four important areas including hippocampus, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, and cerebellum play important roles in the neuropathological changes. The amygdala affects social information and emotional interpretation as well as fear and anxiety responses [65, 66]. Several postmortem morphometric studies have documented developmental alterations in the cerebellum related to ASD [67]. Neocortical studies on autism have found a 67% increase in the number of neurons in prefrontal cortex [68]. Similarly, a connection has been reported between ASD and neuronal size abnormalities in medial temporal lobe structures including the hippocampus [69, 70].

One of the main objectives of this study was to assess the effect of exposure to the mixture of PM2.5 and gases (PGE) and gases alone (GE) on the levels of the oxytocin receptor protein (OXTR). Some associations have been previously observed between OXTR haplotypes, ASD, IQ, and total VABS scores in humans [71]. In the present study, decreased levels of OXTR in the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, and cerebellum were observed in the exposed and ALM rats compared to the control rats. These results are similar to those of Bertelsen et al. [72] in which the level of OXTR decreased in the autistic rat model induced by VPA. The possible mechanism for down-regulation of OXTR protein at nerve terminals was assumed to be the increased oxysterols levels during neuronal injury [73]. There are no prior reports of the role of OXT and OXTR in ROS production in the nervous system. Thus, further studies are required to establish this relationship. Denda et al. [74] found that OXT is expressed in human skin keratinocytes and released in response to a calcium influx via P2X receptors. Also, there are evidence that OXT is not only expressed in keratinocytes, but also in human skin-derived dermal fibroblasts [75], which are in common with neurons in ectodermal derivation. In addition, the role of OXTR expression in fibroblast production has been reported [76]. Expression of OXT occurs in all epidermal layers, while expression of the OXTR only occurs in the basal layers [75].

There is evidence that with inhibition of OXTR signaling in integumentary system, OXT exerts its effects through the alteration of oxidative stress, intracellular GSH levels, and cytokine release by dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes. Increments of susceptibility to oxidative stress occur following the reduction of OXTR in dermal cells [75]. Simultaneous to increment of ROS levels in OXTR reduction in dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes, a decrement of intracellular GSH concentrations has been reported [75]. Some other studies have also shown the role of OXT and OXTR in oxidative stress and GSH levels. For instance, sepsis-induced pelvic inflammation caused by the increase of ROS and reduction of GSH levels, could be treated with OXT administration [77] or with atosiban, an OXTR antagonist that increased oxidative stress in the cardiomyocytes of the newborn rats whose mothers received atosiban during gestation [78]. Previous studies revealed that OXTR is associated with social cognition [79,80,81] in autism [82]. The loss of oxytocin or OXTR may result in reduced social recognition [83] and social interaction [84].

In recent years, several studies have shown the association between exposure to particulate matter and increased risk of ASD [85, 86]. In addition, the relationship between ambient particulate matter and autism-like phenotype has been recently assessed in rodent models. In a study by Li et al. [9], Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to PM2.5 by intranasal instillation. However, Li et al. [9] suggested that the whole-body inhalation exposure (such as the current study) is more physiologically relevant to human context rather than intranasal instillation. In addition, the dose to the rat pups in the Li et al. (2018) study was determined using the adult rat’s respiratory rate. Thus, this dose was higher than typical exposures in humans. In the current study, rats were exposed to the concentrations of PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants at ambient levels. Therefore, this model of exposure may better reflect the actual human exposure to PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants.

Conclusions

In the present study, our results showed that prenatal and early life exposure to a mixture of PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants (PGE rats) and gaseous pollutants alone (GE rats) caused behavioral deficits, including increased repetitive behavior, poor social interaction and an inability to differentiate social novelty. Air pollution also affected oxidative stress biomarkers like CAT and GSH, and may induce down-regulation of OXTR protein in male rats. To our knowledge, this is the first report that compares the effects of exposure to PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants (PGE rats) and gaseous pollutants alone (GE rats) with VPA-induced rat models of ASD (ALM rats). These experimental findings support the hypothesis that an etiological association exists between a complex mixture of air pollution and physiopathology of ASD. Further mechanistic research should be performed to determine the mode of neurodevelopmental toxicity of air pollution on ASD.

Methods

Rats

Wistar rat litters of both sexes were purchased from Pasteur Institute (Tehran, Iran). The rats were housed at the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences under specific pathogen free (SPF) and standard conditions, including access to supplies of water and food ad libitum under a 12 h light/dark cycle. The rats were maintained under constant environmental conditions including temperature of 20–25 °C and relative humidity of 40–60%. The ethical use of animal models was approved by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences’ Ethics Committee.

Study location and method of exposure

The pilot animal (Fig. 8) room was located on the roof of the School of Public Health and Safety of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (35.7991 ̊ N, 51.3947 ̊ E) at a height of 20 m (fourth floor) above the ground.

Fig. 8
figure8

Schematic of exposure method: 1- Oil-free compressor, 2- Thermometer, 3- Air purifier, 4- Moisture Sensor, 5- Dust Track, 6- Time lamp, 7- HEPA Filter, and 8- Echo PM

Four groups of rats including PGE (particulate matter and gaseous pollutants), GE (gaseous pollutants), CAE (clean air) and ALM (autism like model exposed to clean air) rats were exposed in the animal pilot study room. The GE rats in chamber 1 were exposed to filtered ambient air at a flow rate of 20 L/min provided by an oil-free compressor and a HEPA filter (model H13) to remove particulate matter. PGE rats in chamber 2 were exposed to ambient air at a flow rate of 20 L/min using an Echo PM2.5 Low Volume Sampler (LVS) (TCR Tecora Italy) without a filter to provide exposure to both PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants. The CAE and ALM rats were housed in chamber 3, and exposed to cleaned ambient air at 20 L/min flow rate provided by an oil-free compressor and two purifier systems (Model: Air Touch A5, Honeywell, and model: KAIST-AIR Home) to remove both particulate and gaseous pollutants. Pregnant Wistar rats in the ALM group received Valproic Acid (VPA: 350 mg/kg) at gestational day 12.5 to induce ASD.

Drug administration

Before the start of the experiment, the rats at the age of 10 weeks were acclimated to the pilot animal room for 1 week. The rats were then mated in-house at the age of 11 to 13 weeks, and pregnancy was determined by a vaginal plug on embryonic day 1 (E1).

To produce the ALM rats [87], the sodium salt of valproic acid (P4543 - Sigma) was prepared in 0.9% saline solution (100 mg/ml, PH 7.3). On E12.5, when the pregnant rat’s weight was 200–225 g, VPA-dams received a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of VPA at a dose of 350 mg/kg body weight [88]. Control dams received a single injection of saline solution (i.p., 0.9%) (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure9

Experimental design of study: rats were time mated and exposed to PM2.5/gases and gases alone from E0 to PND21. Biochemical tests were started at PND22 by extraction of brain tissue. Behavioral assessments were started at PND 29. * VPA-dams received a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of VPA at a dose of 350 mg/kg body weight

Exposure periods

Pregnant dams and pups were exposed to ambient air that contained PM2.5, CO, NO2, SO2, and O3 for 12 h per day and 5 days per week (Saturday to Wednesday) from embryonic day 0 (E0) to postnatal day 21 (PND21). The concentrations of PM2.5 and gaseous pollutants (CO, NO2, SO2 and O3) in each chamber were measured using a DustTrak model 8520 and an AeroQual 500, respectively.

The rats in control groups were exposed to clean air during the same period. The exposure period was chosen based on the human epidemiological studies suggesting that air pollution exposure during all the three trimesters of pregnancy and the first 9 months of an infant’s life is related to ASD risk [30, 89, 90]. The exposure time was designed to cover the main neurodevelopmental events (including: the timing of neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, gliogenesis, oligodendrocyte maturation) that were happening in this window of susceptibility, the period of E0 to PND21 [91]. For the exposure of pregnant dams and pups, female rats (11–13 week old) were time mated with males (3 females with 1 male per cage) on Friday evenings. The copulatory plug was checked the next morning before the Saturday onset of the weekly exposure. Rats with confirmed vaginal plugs were removed from breeding cage on embryonic day zero and housed individually in cages in either chambers one, two or three. Chambers 1 and 2 housed nine pregnant dams; while chamber 3 housed eighteen dams for duration of their pregnancy, parturition, and weaning of the litters. The use of Friday timed mattings ensured that E0 occurred on a Saturday and ensured that the exposure timing was the same for all rats. All dams were exposed on the same gestational days E0–4, E7–11, E14–18 and all pups were exposed on PND1-PND7, PND10–14, PND17-PND21. Exposure stopped in chambers one and two while rats were giving birth on E19 and E20. On PND14, male and female pups were separated and female pups were removed from their mothers. The male pups remained with their mothers until weaning occurred on PND 21. On PND 22, the pups were divided into two groups. One group were euthanized by decapitation for the biochemical tests and the second group were transferred to housing racks (two rats per cage) 1 week before the starting the behavioral tests (on PND29) and for the duration of the behavioral testing period. Behavioral tests only were performed on male rat offspring and all behavioral tests were performed between 9:00 and 15:00. The behavioral assessments were made sequentially on a single cohort of male rats. This lack of replication is a limitation of this study (Fig. 9).

Determination of PM2.5 characteristics

PM2.5 was sampled continuously during the exposure hours using an Echo PM Low Volume Sampler near the air intake for the exposure chambers [92]. PM2.5 was collected on 47 mm quartz filters at a flow rate of 20 L/min. Before sampling, the filters were washed with double-distilled water, and placed in an oven at 100–105 °C for 2 h [93]. After sampling, the filters were stored in aluminum foil at − 10 °C to prevent evaporation and photo-degradation of PM components. For each 2 days, a new filter was used for sampling. Also, field blanks were used to control for the possible contamination during the sampling procedures. For this, a blank filter was treated with the same manner as a filter used for sampling (placed into the sampler, placed into the aluminum foil, etc.), except that the sampler was not operated.

To determine the elemental composition of PM, one-half of filters were shredded, and put into a Teflon container with 2.5 ml of concentrated of HClO4 (70%) and 2.5 ml HNO3 (69%). Samples were heated at 170 °C for 4 h, and dried on a hot plate at 100 ̊C. After adding 2.5 ml of double-distilled water and 2.5 ml of HNO3,the samples were shaken at 180 rpm for 30 min [93]. Finally, the samples were filtered through Whatman No. 42 filters and diluted with double-distilled water to 10 ml. The samples were stored in plastic vials at − 4 °C until the analysis by ICP/MS (Agilent, Model: 7900) [94]. Laboratory blanks were used to control for the effects of laboratory contaminations. The metal concentrations are provided in the Additional file 1: Table S1. The concentrations of metals were analyzed in triplicate, and the averaged values were used. Field and laboratory blanks were used to control for the effects of field and laboratory contaminations. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ), of Pb was 5 and 1 μg/L, respectively. The LOD and LOQ for other elements were 25 and 5 μg/L, respectively.

To determine the concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), the other section of the filter was placed in a Teflon container, and extracted with 2.5 ml of dichloromethane (CH2CL2) and 2.5 ml of methanol (CH3OH) using an ultrasonic bath at 20 kHz for 30 min (Elmasonic S 80 H). The extracts were filtered with 0.22 μm Millipore filters (Hesperia CA, USA). PAHs concentrations were determined using GC/MS (Agilent, model: 5890 A). The PAH results are provided in Additional file 1: Table S2. The concentrations of PAHs were analyzed in triplicate, and the mean concentrations were reported. In the analysis of all of the blank samples, PAHs were not observed. The values of LOD and LOQ for 16 PAHs were < 2 and < 10 ng/L, respectively.

Behavioral tests

Open field

The open field test was conducted as previously described by Chang et al. [14] with some modifications. At PND29 for the male rat offspring, each rat was placed in a clean acrylic cage (60*60*60) with no bedding for 30 min. To assess general locomotor activity levels and willingness to explore in a novel environment, the rat’s location during the test was tracked using Ehtovision XT 7 system from the video recorded using a Microsoft LifeCam HD-6000.

Social preference test

This test was conducted as previously described by Li et al. [9] with modifications. The three sessions in this test was conducted in a three chambered box (60*40*22 cm) equipped with retractable doorways that permitted access to each chamber.

This test was conducted at PND32 for each male rat offspring. In session 1 (habituation), a pup was placed in the middle chamber with the doorways open, and allowed to explore the other two side chambers. For session 2 (sociability), at the end of the period of habituation, pups were made to interact with a never-before-met and age-matched rat enclosed in a wire cup placed in a side chamber. An empty wire cup was placed in the other side chamber. During session 3 (social novelty), a new and unfamiliar rat was placed in the wire cup that had been empty during the previous session. Each session lasted 10 min, and the time spent in each chamber was manually recorded.

Y-maze

The test was conducted as previously described by Grabrucker et al. [38]. Spontaneous alternation behavior was assessed at PND43 for each male rat offspring in a symmetrical Y Maze (3 arms, 40*9 cm with 16 cm wall height). Arm choices by the rats (all four paws entering one arm) were recorded while the rats were allowed to explore the Y-shaped labyrinth for 5 min. Alternation was determined by recording the order of the visited arms (A, B, or C). Overlapping triplets of three arm visits were counted as one complete spontaneous alternation. The percentage of alternation was calculated using the equation:

$$ Percentage\ of\ alteration=\frac{\mathrm{number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{spontaneous}\ \mathrm{alternation}}{\mathrm{total}\ \mathrm{number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{arm}\ \mathrm{visits}-2}\times 100 $$
(1)

where an alternation was recorded as consecutively visiting the three arms.

Marble burying

This test was conducted as previously described by Ku et al. [95] with some modifications. On PND46 for each male rat offspring, the subject was placed in a standard Plexiglas test cage (42*24*17 cm) with a 5 cm deep layer of corncob bedding, and allowed to explore freely for 10 min. Each subject was placed in a transfer cage and 18 marbles (1.3 cm diameter, red) were placed on the bedding surface in a 3*6 pattern. The subject was then placed in the test cage, and allowed to explore for 10 min. After ten minutes, the subject was removed from the test cage, and the number of buried marbles was counted. A marble was considered as buried only if at least two-third of the marble was covered by the bedding material.

Tissue collection

Studies have increasingly recognized that developing brains are more sensitive to both neuronal apoptosis that are likely to be affected by age-related injury vulnerability [96,97,98,99,100,101]. Since approximately 90% of the rat cortex is formed by PND 20 and the weight of rat cortex reaches approximately to 90% of its weight by PND 20, the typical age of weaning. Also, myelination peaks at approximately PND 20, when maturation markers especially myelin basic protein are detectable [102]. Thus, the biochemical assessments should be performed after the rats attain PND20 to ensure valid test results. Since exposures continued until PND 21, the following day (PND22) was selected for conducting the biochemical tests.

On PND22, sixteen male offspring in each group were anesthetized via CO2 and rapidly decapitated. The prefrontal cortex, amygdala, cerebellum, and hippocampus were rapidly dissected out, and frozen in liquid nitrogen at − 80 °C until use.

GSH

The test was conducted as described by Ellman et al. [103]. Sixty μg of protein supernatant containing 19.8 mg of DTNB (D8130-1G SIGMA) in 100 ml, 0.1% sodium nitrate and phosphate buffer (PH 7.4) were used for the GSH assay. The absorbance was measured at 412 nm by an ELISA reader. Ellman’s colorimetric method measures the formation of GS-TNB complex from DTNB (5,5̉ dithiobis (2- nitro benzoic acid)) in which its reduction caused the development of a yellow color.

Catalase

To determine the level of catalase activity, the concentrations of the yellow stable complex of ammonium molybdate and hydrogen peroxide were measured at 405 nm with an ELISA reader [104]. First, 20 μL of the sample was loaded in each well of the 96-well microplate. Then, 100 μL hydrogen peroxide (65 mM) was added to each well. This mixture was incubated for 4 min at 25 °C. Then, 100 μl of ammonium molybdate (32.4 mM) was added to each well, and the absorbance was read at 405 nm.

Western blot

Western blotting was used to assess the level of OXTR in the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, and cerebellum of the male rats. On PND 22, the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, and cerebellum were excised. Next, they were lysed on ice via lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (PH 8), 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1%Triton X-100, complete protease inhibitor cocktail, phosphatase inhibitors cocktail] for 2 min. Then, the lysates were cleared with centrifugation at 16,100 Xg for 10 min at 4 °C. In order to determine the protein concentration, Bradford’s method [105] using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard was performed to denature proteins, equal volumes of 5X sample buffer were added to lysate proteins. Then 60 μg of total proteins were loaded into SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Then blots were blocked by blocking solution [2% non-fat dry milk in tris-buffered saline Tween 20 (TBST) (containing 0.2% Tween 20, 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl] for one hour and half. At this point, the membranes were incubated with the primary antibody (Anti-Oxytocin Receptor antibody [EPR12789]-20 ̊C) (Abcam ab181077-100 μl) at 4 °C overnight. Next day, the blots were washed with TBST three times for 10 min each. After incubating with the anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody (Anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Antibody) (cellsignaling) for 90 min at the room temperature, immunoreactivity was detected with ECL kit and captured by Kodak x-ray films. To compensate for loading errors, membranes were stripped with stripping buffer [100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% (w/v) SDS, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (PH 7)] followed by incubating with anti β-actin antibody. Densitometric data of protein bands were obtained with ImageJ 1.41o.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by using Graph Pad software (Graph Pad Prism v6.0). For the three-chambered social preference test, time spent in the ‘stranger1’ versus ‘empty’ chambers (for the sociability phase) or ‘stranger1’ versus ‘stranger2’ chambers (for the social novelty phase) were compared with a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey ̉s test for the multiple comparisons. A one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey ̉s test was used for the analysis of the other test results. Multiple comparison corrections were not done. The significance levels of 0.05, 0.01, 0.001and 0.0001 were applied in all analyses.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder. 5th ed; 2013. p. 24–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Baxter AJ, Brugha TS, Erskine HE, Scheurer RW, Vos T, Scott JG. The epidemiology and global burden of autism spectrum disorders. Psychol Med. 2015;45(3):601–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329171400172x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    French LRBA, Hyde KL, Fombonne E. Epidemiology of autism Spectrum disorders. Neurosci Autism Spectr Disord. 2013;43:3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Blumberg SJ, Bramlett MD, Kogan MD, Schieve LA, Jones JR, Lu MC. Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged U.S. children: 2007 to 2011–2012. Natl Health Stat Report. 2013;65:1–11 1 p following.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wallace S, Fein D, Rosanoff M, Dawson G, Hossain S, Brennan L, et al. A global public health strategy for autism spectrum disorders. Autism Res. 2012;5(3):211–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Grønborg TK, Schendel DE, Parner ET. Recurrence of autism Spectrum disorders in full- and half-siblings and trends over time: a population-based cohort study. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(10):947–53. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2259 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610344/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kim YS, Leventhal BL. Genetic epidemiology and insights into interactive genetic and environmental effects in autism spectrum disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77(1):66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.11.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rossignol DA, Genuis SJ, Frye RE. Environmental toxicants and autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Transl Psychiatry. 2014;4:e360. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2014.4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Li K, Li L, Cui B, Gai Z, Li Q, Wang S, et al. Early postnatal exposure to airborne fine particulate matter induces autism-like phenotypes in male rats. Toxicol Sci. 2018;162(1):189–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfx240.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Costa LG, Chang YC, Cole TB. Developmental neurotoxicity of traffic-related air pollution: focus on autism. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017;4(2):156–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0135-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Becerra TA, Wilhelm M, Olsen J, Cockburn M, Ritz B. Ambient air pollution and autism in Los Angeles county, California. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(3):380–6. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205827.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rice D, Barone S Jr. Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(Suppl 3):511–33. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108s3511.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rodier PM, Ingram JL, Tisdale B, Nelson S, Romano J. Embryological origin for autism: developmental anomalies of the cranial nerve motor nuclei. J Comp Neurol. 1996;370(2):247–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19960624)370:2<247::aid-cne8>3.0.co;2-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chang Y-C, Cole TB, Costa LG. Prenatal and early-life diesel exhaust exposure causes autism-like behavioral changes in mice. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2018;15(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-018-0254-4 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-018-0254-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Thirtamara Rajamani K, Doherty-Lyons S, Bolden C, Willis D, Hoffman C, Zelikoff J, et al. Prenatal and early-life exposure to high-level diesel exhaust particles leads to increased locomotor activity and repetitive behaviors in mice. Autism Res. 2013;6(4):248–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ortega R, Bresson C, Darolles C, Gautier C, Roudeau S, Perrin L, et al. Low-solubility particles and a Trojan-horse type mechanism of toxicity: the case of cobalt oxide on human lung cells. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014;11:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-11-14 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24669904.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Peters A. Ea. translocation and potential neurological effects of fine and ultrafine particles a criticalupdate. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2006;3:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Muhlfeld C, et al. Interactions of nanoparticles with pulmonary structures and cellular responses. AmJ Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;294:L817–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Simkhovich BZ. Ea. air pollution and cardiovascular injury epidemiology, toxicology, and mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:719–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ma JYMJ. The dual effect of the particulate and organic components of diesel exhaust particles on the alteration of pulmonary immune/inflammatory responses and metabolic enzymes. Environ Sci Health Part C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2002;20:117–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Colin-Barenque LFT. Oxidative stress and metals. In: Fortoul T, editor. Metals and toxicological implications in Health. Kerala: Research Signpost; 2007. p. 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    KA J. The relevance of metals in the pathophysiology of neurodegeneration,pathological considerations. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;110:1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    MohanKumar SMCA, Block M, Veronesi B. Particulate matter, oxidative stress and neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicology. 2008;29(3):479–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Grice DE, Buxbaum JD. The genetics of autism spectrum disorders. NeuroMolecular Med. 2006;8(4):451–60. https://doi.org/10.1385/NMM:8:4:451 https://doi.org/10.1385/NMM:8:4:451.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    María Elena González-Fraguela M-LDH, Vera H, Maragoto C, Noris E, Blanco L, Galvizu R. Maria Robinson oxidative stress markers in children with autism Spectrum disorders. Br J Med Med Res. 2013;3(2):307–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Arons MH, Thynne CJ, Grabrucker AM, Li D, Schoen M, Cheyne JE, et al. Autism-associated mutations in ProSAP2/Shank3 impair synaptic transmission and neurexin-neuroligin-mediated transsynaptic signaling. J Neurosci. 2012;32(43):14966–78. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2215-12.2012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Johnson ZV, Young LJ. Oxytocin and vasopressin neural networks: Implications for social behavioral diversity and translational neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;76:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.034.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Modi ME, Young LJ. The oxytocin system in drug discovery for autism: animal models and novel therapeutic strategies. Horm Behav. 2012;61(3):340–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Freeman SM, Palumbo MC, Lawrence RH, Smith AL, Goodman MM, Bales KL. Effect of age and autism spectrum disorder on oxytocin receptor density in the human basal forebrain and midbrain. Translational Psychiat. 2018;81:257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0315-3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Volk HE, Lurmann F, Penfold B, Hertz-Picciotto I, McConnell R. Traffic related air pollution, particulate matter, and autism. JAMA psychiatry. 2013;70(1):71–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.266 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4019010/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yamaguchi H, Hara Y, Ago Y, Takano E, Hasebe S, Nakazawa T, et al. Environmental enrichment attenuates behavioral abnormalities in valproic acid-exposed autism model mice. Behav Brain Res. 2017;333:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.06.035.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nicolini C, Fahnestock M. The valproic acid-induced rodent model of autism. Exp Neurol. 2018;299:217–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.04.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Campolongo M, Kazlauskas N, Falasco G, Urrutia L, Salgueiro N, Hocht C, et al. Sociability deficits after prenatal exposure to valproic acid are rescued by early social enrichment. Mol Autism. 2018;9:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-018-0221-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Win-Shwe TT, Nway NC, Imai M, Lwin TT, Mar O, Watanabe H. Social behavior, neuroimmune markers and glutamic acid decarboxylase levels in a rat model of valproic acid-induced autism. J Toxicol Sci. 2018;43(11):631–43. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.43.631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Peralta F, Fuentealba C, Fiedler J, Aliaga E. Prenatal valproate treatment produces autistic-like behavior and increases metabotropic glutamate receptor 1A-immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of juvenile rats. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14:2807–14. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5529.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kaidanovich-Beilin O, Lipina T, Vukobradovic I, Roder J, Woodgett JR. Assessment of social interaction behaviors. J Vis Exp. 2011;48. https://doi.org/10.3791/2473.

  37. 37.

    Roullet FI, Crawley JN. Mouse models of autism: testing hypotheses about molecular mechanisms. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2011;7:187–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2010_113 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3396120/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Grabrucker S, Boeckers TM, Grabrucker AM. Gender dependent evaluation of autism like behavior in mice exposed to prenatal zinc deficiency. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016;10:37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00037 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4776245.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Perlroth NH, Castelo Branco CW. Current knowledge of environmental exposure in children during the sensitive developmental periods. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2017;93(1):17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2016.07.002 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755716302352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lamichhane DK, Leem JH, Lee JY, Kim HC. A meta-analysis of exposure to particulate matter and adverse birth outcomes. Environ Health Toxicol. 2015;30:e2015011. https://doi.org/10.5620/eht.e2015011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Stapleton PA. Gestational nanomaterial exposures: microvascular implications during pregnancy, fetal development and adulthood. J Physiol. 2016;594(8):2161–73. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP270581 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26332609.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nachman RM, Mao G, Zhang X, Hong X, Chen Z, Soria CS, et al. Intrauterine Inflammation and Maternal Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 during Preconception and Specific Periods of Pregnancy: The Boston Birth Cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(10):1608–15. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp243.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Valentino SA, Tarrade A, Aioun J, Mourier E, Richard C, Dahirel M, et al. Maternal exposure to diluted diesel engine exhaust alters placental function and induces intergenerational effects in rabbits. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2016;13(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0151-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hougaard KS, Campagnolo L, Chavatte-Palmer P, Tarrade A, Rousseau-Ralliard D, Valentino S, et al. A perspective on the developmental toxicity of inhaled nanoparticles. Reprod Toxicol. 2015;56:118–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2015.05.015.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Muoth C, Aengenheister L, Kucki M, Wick P, Buerki-Thurnherr T. Nanoparticle transport across the placental barrier: pushing the field forward! Nanomedicine (London, England). 2016;11(8):941–57. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2015-0012.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bové H, Bongaerts E, Slenders E, Bijnens EM, Saenen ND, Gyselaers W, et al. Ambient black carbon particles reach the fetal side of human placenta. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3866. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11654-3 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11654-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Vadillo-Ortega F, Osornio-Vargas A, Buxton MA, Sanchez BN, Rojas-Bracho L, Viveros-Alcaraz M, et al. Air pollution, inflammation and preterm birth: a potential mechanistic link. Med Hypotheses. 2014;82(2):219–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2013.11.042.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Al-Gubory KH. Environmental pollutants and lifestyle factors induce oxidative stress and poor prenatal development. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29(1):17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lager S, Powell TL. Regulation of nutrient transport across the placenta. J Pregnancy. 2012;2012:179827. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/179827.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Motesaddi Zarandi S, Shahsavani A, Khodagholi F, Fakhri Y. Co-exposure to ambient PM2.5 plus gaseous pollutants increases amyloid β1–42 accumulation in the hippocampus of male and female rats. Toxin Rev. 2019:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2019.1611604 https://doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2019.1611604.

  51. 51.

    Jedrychowski WA, Perera FP, Camann D, Spengler J, Butscher M, Mroz E, et al. Prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and cognitive dysfunction in children. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015;22(5):3631–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3627-8 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25253062.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Zhang Y, Ji X, Ku T, Li G, Sang N. Heavy metals bound to fine particulate matter from northern China induce season-dependent health risks: A study based on myocardial toxicity. Environ Pollut. 2016;216:380–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.072 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749116304602.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Fortoul T, Rodriguez-Lara V, Gonzalez-Villalva A, Rojas-Lemus M, Colin-Barenque L, Bizarro-Nevares P, García-Peláez I, Ustarroz-Cano M, López-Zepeda S, Cervantes-Yépez S, López-Valdez N, Meléndez-García N, Espinosa-Zurutuza M, Cano-Gutierrez G, Cano-Rodríguez MC. Health Effects of Metals in Particulate Matter. In: Current Air Quality Issues, vol. 571; 2015. p. 608. https://doi.org/10.5772/59749.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Flores-Pajot M-C, Ofner M, Do MT, Lavigne E, Villeneuve PJ. Childhood autism spectrum disorders and exposure to nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter air pollution: A review and meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2016;151:763–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.030 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935116303176.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Pasciuto E, Borrie SC, Kanellopoulos AK, Santos AR, Cappuyns E, D'Andrea L, et al. Autism Spectrum disorders: translating human deficits into mouse behavior. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2015;124:71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2015.07.013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Servadio M, Vanderschuren LJ, Trezza V. Modeling autism-relevant behavioral phenotypes in rats and mice: Do ‘autistic’ rodents exist? Behav Pharmacol. 2015;26(6):522–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/fbp.0000000000000163.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Moy SS, Nadler JJ, Young NB, Perez A, Holloway LP, Barbaro RP, et al. Mouse behavioral tasks relevant to autism: phenotypes of 10 inbred strains. Behav Brain Res. 2007;176(1):4–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.07.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Church JS, Tijerina PB, Emerson FJ, Coburn MA, Blum JL, Zelikoff JT, et al. Perinatal exposure to concentrated ambient particulates results in autism-like behavioral deficits in adult mice. Neurotoxicology. 2018;65:231–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2017.10.007 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161813X17302115.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ma M, Li S, Jin H, Zhang Y, Xu J, Chen D, et al. Characteristics and oxidative stress on rats and traffic policemen of ambient fine particulate matter from Shenyang. Sci Total Environ. 2015;526:110–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.075.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Chauhan A, Chauhan V. Oxidative stress in autism. Pathophysiology. 2006;13(3):171–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2006.05.007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Schafer FQ, Buettner GR. Redox environment of the cell as viewed through the redox state of the glutathione disulfide/glutathione couple. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001;30(11):1191–212.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Al-Abrash AS, Al-Quobaili FA, Al-Akhras GN. Catalase evaluation in different human diseases associated with oxidative stress. Saudi Med J. 2000;21(9):826–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    James SJ, Cutler P, Melnyk S, Jernigan S, Janak L, Gaylor DW, et al. Metabolic biomarkers of increased oxidative stress and impaired methylation capacity in children with autism. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(6):1611–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1611.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zoroglu SS, Armutcu F, Ozen S, Gurel A, Sivasli E, Yetkin O, et al. Increased oxidative stress and altered activities of erythrocyte free radical scavenging enzymes in autism. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;254(3):143–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-004-0456-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Amaral DG, Bauman MD, Schumann CM. The amygdala and autism: implications from non-human primate studies. Genes Brain Behav. 2003;2(5):295–302.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Winston JS, Strange BA, O'Doherty J, Dolan RJ. Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5(3):277–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn816.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Hutsler JJ, Zhang H. Increased dendritic spine densities on cortical projection neurons in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Res. 2010;1309:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.120.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Courchesne E, Mouton PR, Calhoun ME, Semendeferi K, Ahrens-Barbeau C, Hallet MJ, et al. Neuron number and size in prefrontal cortex of children with autism. JAMA. 2011;306(18):2001–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1.638.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Bauman M, Kemper TL. Histoanatomic observations of the brain in early infantile autism. Neurology. 1985;35(6):866–74. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.35.6.866.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Chaddad A, Desrosiers C, Hassan L, Tanougast C. Hippocampus and amygdala radiomic biomarkers for the study of autism spectrum disorder. BMC Neurosci. 2017;18(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-017-0373-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    de Wied D, Diamant M, Fodor M. Central nervous system effects of the neurohypophyseal hormones and related peptides. Front Neuroendocrinol. 1993;14(4):251–302. https://doi.org/10.1006/frne.1993.1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Bertelsen F, Folloni D, Moller A, Landau AM, Scheel-Kruger J, Winterdahl M. Suppressed play behaviour and decreased oxytocin receptor binding in the amygdala after prenatal exposure to low-dose valproic acid. Behav Pharmacol. 2017;28(6):450–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/fbp.0000000000000316.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Loke SY, Tanaka K, Ong WY. Comprehensive gene expression analyses of the rat prefrontal cortex after oxysterol treatment. J Neurochem. 2013;124(6):770–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.12142.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Denda S, Takei K, Kumamoto J, Goto M, Tsutsumi M, Denda M. Oxytocin is expressed in epidermal keratinocytes and released upon stimulation with adenosine 5′-[gamma-thio] triphosphate in vitro. Exp Dermatol. 2012;21(7):535–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0625.2012.01507.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Deing V, Roggenkamp D, Kühnl J, Gruschka A, Stäb F, Wenck H, et al. Oxytocin modulates proliferation and stress responses of human skin cells: implications for atopic dermatitis. Exp Dermatol. 2013;22(6):399–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.12155 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/exd.12155.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Stock S, Uvnas-Moberg K. Increased plasma levels of oxytocin in response to afferent electrical stimulation of the sciatic and vagal nerves and in response to touch and pinch in anaesthetized rats. Acta Physiol Scand. 1988;132(1):29–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1988.tb08294.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Iseri SO, Sener G, Saglam B, Gedik N, Ercan F, Yegen BC. Oxytocin protects against sepsis-induced multiple organ damage: role of neutrophils. J Surg Res. 2005;126(1):73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.01.021.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Simsek Y, Celik O, Karaer A, Yilmaz E, Gul M, Ozerol E, et al. Elevated cardiac oxidative stress in newborn rats from mothers treated with atosiban. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(3):655–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2069-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Landgraf R, Neumann ID. Vasopressin and oxytocin release within the brain: a dynamic concept of multiple and variable modes of neuropeptide communication. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2004;25(3–4):150–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2004.05.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Kirsch P, Esslinger C, Chen Q, Mier D, Lis S, Siddhanti S, et al. Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. J Neurosci. 2005;25(49):11489–93. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3984-05.2005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature. 2005;435(7042):673–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03701 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03701.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Kosaka H, Munesue T, Ishitobi M, Asano M, Omori M, Sato M, et al. Long-term oxytocin administration improves social behaviors in a girl with autistic disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12(1):110. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-110 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Lee HJ, Caldwell HK, Macbeth AH, Tolu SG, Young WS 3rd. A conditional knockout mouse line of the oxytocin receptor. Endocrinology. 2008;149(7):3256–63. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2007-1710.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Pobbe RL, Pearson BL, Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ. Oxytocin receptor and Mecp2 308/Y knockout mice exhibit altered expression of autism-related social behaviors. Physiol Behav. 2012;107(5):641–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.02.024.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Raz R, Roberts AL, Lyall K, Hart JE, Just AC, Laden F, et al. Autism spectrum disorder and particulate matter air pollution before, during, and after pregnancy: a nested case-control analysis within the Nurses' health study II cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(3):264–70. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408133 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25522338.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Talbott EO, Arena VC, Rager JR, Clougherty JE, Michanowicz DR, Sharma RK, et al. Fine particulate matter and the risk of autism spectrum disorder. Environ Res. 2015;140:414–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.04.021.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Rodier PM, Ingram JL, Tisdale B, Croog VJ. Linking etiologies in humans and animal models: Studies of autism. Reprod Toxicol. 1997;11(2):417–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6238(97)80001-U http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089062389780001U.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Snow WM, Hartle K, Ivanco TL. Altered morphology of motor cortex neurons in the VPA rat model of autism. Dev Psychobiol. 2008;50(7):633–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Guxens M, Ghassabian A, Gong T, Garcia-Esteban R, Porta D, Giorgis-Allemand L, et al. Air pollution exposure during pregnancy and childhood autistic traits in four European population-based cohort studies: the ESCAPE project. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(1):133–40. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408483.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Volk HE, Hertz-Picciotto I, Delwiche L, Lurmann F, McConnell R. Residential proximity to freeways and autism in the CHARGE study. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(6):873–7. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Semple BD, Blomgren K, Gimlin K, Ferriero DM, Noble-Haeusslein LJ. Brain development in rodents and humans: Identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species. Prog Neurobiol. 2013;106(107):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.04,001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    US EPA: Method 5 - particulate matter (PM). Edited by air emission measurement center (EMC) UE, Available Online: https://www.epa.gov/emc/method-5-particulate-matterpm2017

  93. 93.

    Ashrafi K, Fallah R, Hadei M, Yarahmadi M, Shahsavani A. Source apportionment of Total suspended particles (TSP) by positive matrix factorization (PMF) and chemical mass balance (CMB) modeling in Ahvaz, Iran. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2018;75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-017-0500-z.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Perez N, Pey J, Querol X, Alastuey A, Lopez J, Viana M. Partitioning of major and trace components in PM10-PM2.5-PM1 at an urban site in Southern Europe. Atmos Environ. 2008;42:1677–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.034.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Katherine M, Ku RKW, Silverman JL, Berman RF, Bauman MD. Behavioral Phenotyping of Juvenile Long-Evans and Sprague-Dawley Rats: Implications for Preclinical Models of Autism Spectrum Disorders. PLoS One. 2016;11(16):150–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158150.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Bayir H, Kochanek PM, Kagan VE. Oxidative stress in immature brain after traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurosci. 2006;28(4–5):420–31. https://doi.org/10.1159/000094168.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Blomgren K, Hagberg H. Free radicals, mitochondria, and hypoxia-ischemia in the developing brain. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;40(3):388–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.08.040.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Blomgren K, Leist M, Groc L. Pathological apoptosis in the developing brain. Apoptosis. 2007;12(5):993–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-007-0754-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Blomgren K, Zhu C, Hallin U, Hagberg H. Mitochondria and ischemic reperfusion damage in the adult and in the developing brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;304(3):551–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00628-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Ikonomidou C, Kaindl AM. Neuronal death and oxidative stress in the developing brain. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(8):1535–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3581.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Chen CY, Noble-Haeusslein LJ, Ferriero D, Semple BD. Traumatic injury to the immature frontal lobe: a new murine model of long-term motor impairment in the absence of psychosocial or cognitive deficits. Dev Neurosci. 2013;35(6):474–90. https://doi.org/10.1159/000355874 https://www.karger.com/DOI/10.1159/000355874.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Wiggins RC. Myelination: a critical stage in development. Neurotoxicology. 1986;7(2):103–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Ellman GL. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1959;82(1):70–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003986159900906.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Goth L. A simple method for determination of serum catalase activity and revision of reference range. Clin Chim Acta. 1991;196(2–3):143–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(91)90067-m.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is a part of the Mastership student’s thesis of Baharan Emam at School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The authors wish to thank Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (grant number # 15515)

Funding

This study was funded by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Grant number: 15515).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BE participated in study design, in vivo section, experiments, data analysis, and manuscript writing. AS, FK, and SMZ participated in study design, experiments, data analysis, and manuscript writing. PKH, MH, HMB and MY participated in study design, parts of experiments, data analysis, and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abbas Shahsavani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All ethical aspects of this study were approved by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences’ Ethics Committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Concentration of Metals bound PM2.5 in exposure period. Table S2. Concentration of 16-PAHs bound PM2.5 in exposure period.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Emam, B., Shahsavani, A., Khodagholi, F. et al. Effects of PM2.5 and gases exposure during prenatal and early-life on autism–like phenotypes in male rat offspring. Part Fibre Toxicol 17, 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-0336-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • Fine particulate matter
  • Behavioral assessment
  • OXTR protein