- Open Access
The effect of a new formaldehyde-free binder on the dissolution rate of glass wool fibre in physiological saline solution
© Potter and Olang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 7 February 2013
Accepted: 10 April 2013
Published: 12 April 2013
The in-vitro dissolution rate of fibres is a good predictor of the in-vivo behavior and potential health effects of inhaled fibres. This study examines the effect of a new formaldehyde-free carbohydrate-polycarboxylic acid binder on the in-vitro dissolution rate of biosoluble glass fibres. Dissolution rate measurements in pH 7.4 physiological saline solution show that the presence of the binder on wool insulation glass fibres has no effect on their dissolution. There is no measurable difference between the dissolution rates of continuous draw fibres before and after binder was applied by dipping. Nor is there a measurable difference between the dissolution rates of a production glass wool sample with binder and that same sample after removal of the binder by low-temperature ashing. Morphological examination shows that swelling of the binder in the solution is at least partially responsible for the development of open channels around the glass-binder interface early in the dissolution. These channels allow fluid to reach the entire glass surface under the binder coating. There is no evidence of any delay in the dissolution rate as a result of the binder coating.
The critical role of dissolution on the potential health effects of inhaled fibres is well established . Over the last several decades there have been numerous publications on the relation between various physical characteristics of a synthetic vitreous fibre and its dissolution rate in physiological saline solution. These include the chemical composition of the fibre , fibre density changes as a result of annealing , fibre diameter , and the physical changes resulting from the fiberization method [3–5].
In addition to glass fibres, commercial insulation glass wool products typically contain an organic binder to give the strength and mechanical integrity required for their end use application. Although Bauer  notes that it is unlikely that fibres with thick binder coatings could reach the deep lung due to aerodynamic considerations, binder is typically found on some fibres during routine microscopic examination of airborne respirable fibres [unpublished observations, M. Kalinowski, Owens Corning Science and Technology Center]. It is therefore desirable to know if such binders provide any protection in the lung environment that would slow the dissolution rate of an otherwise biosoluble fibre.
Glass wool insulation binders, traditionally phenol-formaldehyde based resins, have received some previous study. Mattson  measured the dissolution rate in simulated lung fluid of a production glass wool with no applied binder, with phenol-formaldehyde binder, and with that binder removed by low temperature ashing. She found the dissolution rates for the three samples to be the same within the uncertainty of the measurements. Bauer  also found that phenol-formaldehyde binder has no effect on the dissolution rate. In addition, his microscopic examination of partially-dissolved samples showed that fluid attack of the resin-glass bond left the fibre surface exposed directly to the fluid early in the dissolution process. Similar experiments with coatings of silicone oil and a silane coupling agent alone, materials commonly used in commercial glass wool insulation binders, showed a similar delamination of the resin-glass interface but at a later point in the dissolution process. Although the silicone-silane coating caused an initial slowing of the dissolution, this did not last long enough to affect significantly the dissolution rate.
The studies just cited show that the phenol-formaldehyde binder traditionally used in commercial glass wool insulation has no effect on the dissolution of the glass fibres in physiological saline solution. In addition, these studies indicated that the absence of a protective effect was due, at least in part, to early attack of the glass-binder interface, which allows access of the fluid to the fibre surface even under thick binder droplets.
More recently, a number of new, formaldehyde-free binders, typically based on carbohydrate-polycarboxylic acid chemistry, have been developed and used in commercial insulation glass wool production. The present study addresses two questions about the effect of such new binders on the dissolution rate of wool insulation glass fibre in physiological saline solution: 1) does a visible layer of the binder affect the dissolution rate of the fibre underneath it and 2) does binder application influence the dissolution rate of fibre not visibly coated with it.
Continuous fibre experiment
Glass fibre chemical compositions expressed as oxide weight percent
Samples for dissolution rate measurement
Dissolution rate in ng/cm 2/hr
271 ± 10
3x dipped in binder; dried 30 minutes at 100 C; cured 3 minutes at 204 C
263 ± 10
low temperature ashed to remove production binder
319 ± 22
326 ± 9
Production wool experiment
Fibre dissolution under binder droplets
The data in Figures 3 and 5 and the dissolution rate constants in Table 2 calculated from them show no measurable difference between the dissolution of fibre within a binder droplet and fibre with no binder. The mobility of binder droplets along the fibres shortly after the dissolution process has begun indicates that any pre-existing bond between binder and fibre is soon broken, giving the dissolution fluid access to the fibre surface. If the binder droplets slowed the dissolution to a measurable extent before this occurred, we would expect to see later in the dissolution locally thick areas along the fibre. These would be particularly evident in the first experiment with the uniform diameter, continuous draw fibres. We found no such areas in either set of experiments.
Fibre dissolution with no visible binder
It is possible that some component of the binder forms a protective coating in the fibre that is too thin to see under microscopic examination as Bauer found for a silicone-silane coating . We found no evidence for this in either set of experiments. Both the continuous draw and the production wool fibres decreased in diameter regardless of droplet location at a rate equal to that of fibres without binder.
Glass A is a production wool glass that was formed into continuous fibre of uniform 9.5 μm diameter using a laboratory continuous draw process. Sample 1 in Table 2 is this fibre with no further treatment. We coated individual fibres with binder by dipping them into a binder solution three successive times with a brief drying at 100 C between each dip. Finally we dried the fibres for 30 minutes at 100 C and cured them for 3 minutes at 204 C. This resulted in fibres with small droplets of cured binder along their lengths at irregular intervals with no obvious coating in between. Sample 2 in Table 2 is this fibre. Glass B is production glass wool insulation which already contained binder. Sample 4 in Table 2 is this fibre with no further treatment. Sample 3 is this fibre treated with low-temperature oxygen plasma to remove all organic material. The binder on samples 2 and 4 is a carbohydrate-polycarboxylic acid based formulation of the type described by Hawkins .
Dissolution rate measurement
We determined fibre dissolution rate by direct measurement of fibre diameter using an optical microscope as documented elsewhere . In this method, individual fibres are glued onto a plastic mount so that they span an open slot in the mount. This mount fits into a closed, transparent, flow-through cell which directs a constant flow of the physiological fluid past the fibres. Immersion in a constant temperature bath maintains the cell at 37 C. Periodically the cell is removed from the bath and the diameters of individual fibres measured. A linear fit of diameter decrease with time yields the dissolution rate constant, kdis, in units of ng/cm2/hr with an uncertainty which is the standard error of the fit.
In the work reported here, solution flow rate was 0.1 ml/min. Due to the small fiber surface area exposed to the fluid, this is well within the region in which fiber dissolution rate is independent of solution flow rate . For each fiber sample we measured the diameters of eight individual fibres approximately every two weeks. The edge of the mount slot, the distinct morphologies of the individual fibres, and a vernier on the microscope stage allowed us to identify the measurement location on each fibre. The physiological fluid was a modification of Gambles solution at a pH near 7.4 as described by Mattson . It was not always possible to see the fibre through a binder droplet clearly enough to measure its diameter deep within the droplet (Figure 1). But it is generally possible to do this with smaller droplets after several weeks in the physiological fluid (Figures 2 and 4).
Under the conditions of these experiments we found no evidence of any impact of the carbohydrate-carboxylic acid binder on the measured in-vitro dissolution rate of the two biosoluble insulation glass wool compositions.
The authors acknowledge with thanks the following Owens Corning colleagues. Tim Gilbert produced the continuous draw fibres, coated them with binder, and mounted them for dissolution rate measurement. Terry Gano did the low temperature ashing of sample 3. Tom Laskowski provided the photomicrographs of the dissolving fibres. John Hadley improved the quality of the manuscript with his critical review.
- Maxim LD, Hadley JG, Potter RM, Niebo R: The role of fiber durability/biopersistence of silica-based synthetic vitreous fibers and their influence on toxicology. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2006, 46: 42–62. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.05.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mattson SM: Factors affecting fiber dissolution – in-vitro experiments. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Glass: Vol 3. 3rd edition. Beijing: Chinese Ceramic Society; 1995:368–373.Google Scholar
- Potter RM: Method for determination of in-vitro fiber dissolution rate by direct optical measurement of diameter decrease. Glastechnische Berichte Glass Science and Technology 2000, 73: 46–55.Google Scholar
- Bauer JF: Effect of fiberization process on glass fiber surfaces. Advances in Fusion and Processing of Glass II: Ceramic Transactions 1998, 82: 187–202.Google Scholar
- Bauer JF: Interaction of glass fiber with physiological fluids: the role of surface. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress on Glass: Vol C-05. San Francisco, California: American Ceramic Society; 1998:1–10.Google Scholar
- Hawkins CM, Hernandez-Torres JM, Chen L: Bio-based binders for insulation and non-woven mats. In United States Patent Application Publication. No. 2011/0086567 A1. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; 2011.Google Scholar
- Mattson SM: Glass fibres in simulated lung fluid: dissolution behavior and analytical requirements. Ann Occup Hyg 1994, 38: 857–877.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.