Skip to main content
Download PDF

Amorphous SiO2 nanoparticles promote cardiac dysfunction via the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore in rat heart and human cardiomyocytes

Particle and Fibre Toxicology volume 17, Article number: 15 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Silica nanoparticles (nanoSiO2) are promising systems that can deliver biologically active compounds to tissues such as the heart in a controllable manner. However, cardiac toxicity induced by nanoSiO2 has been recently related to abnormal calcium handling and energetic failure in cardiomyocytes. Moreover, the precise mechanisms underlying this energetic debacle remain unclear. In order to elucidate these mechanisms, this article explores the ex vivo heart function and mitochondria after exposure to nanoSiO2.

Results

The cumulative administration of nanoSiO2 reduced the mechanical performance index of the rat heart with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 93 μg/mL, affecting the relaxation rate. In isolated mitochondria nanoSiO2 was found to be internalized, inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation and significantly reducing the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). The mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) was also induced with an increasing dose of nanoSiO2 and partially recovered with, a potent blocker of the mPTP, Cyclosporine A (CsA). The activity of aconitase and thiol oxidation, in the adenine nucleotide translocase, were found to be reduced due to nanoSiO2 exposure, suggesting that nanoSiO2 induces the mPTP via thiol modification and ROS generation. In cardiac cells exposed to nanoSiO2, enhanced viability and reduction of H2O2 were observed after application of a specific mitochondrial antioxidant, MitoTEMPO. Concomitantly, CsA treatment in adult rat cardiac cells reduced the nanoSiO2-triggered cell death and recovered ATP production (from 32.4 to 65.4%). Additionally, we performed evaluation of the mitochondrial effect of nanoSiO2 in human cardiomyocytes. We observed a 40% inhibition of maximal oxygen consumption rate in mitochondria at 500 μg/mL. Under this condition we identified a remarkable diminution in the spare respiratory capacity. This data indicates that a reduction in the amount of extra ATP that can be produced by mitochondria during a sudden increase in energy demand. In human cardiomyocytes, increased LDH release and necrosis were found at increased doses of nanoSiO2, reaching 85 and 48%, respectively. Such deleterious effects were partially prevented by the application of CsA. Therefore, exposure to nanoSiO2 affects cardiac function via mitochondrial dysfunction through the opening of the mPTP.

Conclusion

The aforementioned effects can be partially avoided reducing ROS or retarding the opening of the mPTP. These novel strategies which resulted in cardioprotection could be considered as potential therapies to decrease the side effects of nanoSiO2 exposure.

Introduction

Silica nanoparticles (nanoSiO2) have been widely studied for biomedical and biotechnological applications [44], specifically those of amorphous nature, which arise from several synthetic preparation methods. In addition, nanoSiO2 is unintentionally present in silica powders typically used in the industry for food, cosmetic and health applications [7]. Given this wide range of applications, it is clear that intended or unintended exposure to amorphous nanoSiO2 is likely to occur, which depending on the route of administration and its physicochemical properties, may translocate into the bloodstream and become available to interact with tissues and organs. These possibilities are likely to occur when considering biomedical applications using SiO2, such as a recent diabetes clinical trial involving the consumption of 9 g of food grade SiO2 [1], where in some cases 33% of it can constitute nanoSiO2 [12].

The cardiac toxicity of amorphous nanoSiO2 in murine models has been previously studied. For example, intratracheal instillation of the nanoparticles was demonstrated to cross the alveolar-capillary barrier and impair vascular homeostasis, cause systemic inflammation [45], and a prothrombotic state [13]. Also endothelial and hemodynamic dysfunction in rats has been observed [19]. In adult rat cardiomyocytes, exposure to amorphous nanoSiO2 resulted in a functional loss of contraction caused by a dysregulation of intracellular Ca2+ handling, due in part to an increased oxidative stress production and reduced mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm), resulting in impaired ATP production [24]. In vitro studies have found that, when exposed to cardiomyoblasts, nanoSiO2 resulted in Cx43 phosphorylation, which led to an inhibition of the gap junction intercellular communication [14]. In HUVEC cells exposed to nanoSiO2, a reduction in ATP content and reduced expression of genes related to mitochondrial biogenesis were found [26]. However, hitherto there is not enough evidence on how this could affect an intact heart, as well as an unclear picture on the role of nanoSiO2 and the specific toxicity mechanisms triggered on cardiac mitochondria.

Therefore, this study is focused on the deleterious effects of nanoSiO2 perfused into ex vivo rat hearts, and the assessment of its toxicity mechanisms in cardiac cells and isolated mitochondria of both rat and human cardiomyocytes. Results point towards a toxicity mechanism driven by the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) through thiol oxidation of the adenine nucleotide translocase. These effects in the mitochondria were partially reversed using a potent antioxidant agent, and cellular cardioprotection was corroborated by mPTP blocking.

Materials and methods

Materials and reagents

Silica nanoparticles were AEROSIL 380 fumed silica. All reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise stated.

All the studies were performed in accordance with the animal care guidelines of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85–23, Revised 1996). All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee (protocol number 2017-Re-002).

Preparation of nanoSiO2

A general stock of nanoSiO2 was prepared in ultrapure H2O at a concentration of 10 mg/mL, sonicated during 30 min in a sonication bath. From this general stock, specific stocks were prepared for each experiment by diluting the general stock in the media, at the desired experimental dose(s), followed by vigorous vortex.

Particle size distribution (PSD)

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was used to quantify the PSD of the nanoparticles (NPs) in aqueous solutions. Their PSD was obtained from the hydrodynamic diameter ensemble of the NPs, which was determined by fitting the measured intensity autocorrelation. Measurements were performed in a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK).

Surface charge

Electrophoretic light scattering (ELS) was used to determine the zeta potential of the NPs dispersed in aqueous solutions through the Smoluchowski approximation. Measurements were performed in a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK).

Specific surface area (SSA)

Nitrogen gas adsorption isotherm was measured using a sorptometer Quantachrome Autosorb-1 automated gas sorption analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL). Samples (approximately 80 mg) were out-gassed overnight for 10 h at 250 °C before carrying out any measurements. A typical Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) experiment was conducted to a relative pressure, P/P0 < 0.3 at 77 K, where P0 is the saturation pressure.

Ex vivo heart experiments

Male Wistar rats (250–300 g) were injected with heparin (1000 U/kg, i.p.) 20 min prior to anesthesia with pentobarbital (100 mg/kg, i.p.). Once bilateral corneal reflex was absent, the heart was excised through an abdominal approach. Afterwards, the ascending aorta was visualized and cut, placing the heart in a cardioplegic solution, which consisted in the sterile medium of a potassium chloride solution (in mM): NaCl 113, KCl 4.7, MgSO4 1.2, Na2HPO4 0.6, KH2PO4 0.6, NaHCO3 12, KHCO3 10, Taurine 30, Hepes 10 and glucose 5; pH = 7.4 (adjusted with NaOH) and Osmolality = 302 mOsm; 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin [31]. The time between cutting the diaphragm and placing the heart in the solution took less than 60 s in order to avoid ischemia. Hearts were mounted in accordance with the Langendorff model and perfused at a constant flow (12 mL/min) with a Krebs-Henseleit (K-H) buffer [11]. A latex balloon, connected to a pressure transducer filled with saline solution, was inserted into the left ventricle after establishing autonomous contraction. The pulmonary artery was cannulated and connected to a closed chamber using a Clark-type oxygen electrode (Yellow Springs Instruments, Yellow Springs, Ohio) to measure myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) in the coronary effluent. The rate of MVO2 was calculated as the difference between the concentration in the K-H buffer before (100%) and after perfusion. Data Trax software (WPI, Sarasota, Florida) was used for continuous recording of the heart rate (HR), left ventricular pressure (LVP), and maximum positive and negative derivative of left ventricular pressure (±dP/dt). The baseline was established during 10–15 min of K-H buffer perfusion, then either K-H buffer or K-H buffer + nanoSiO2 was continued to be perfused during 30 min, followed by 10 min of K-H buffer perfusion. Hearts were analyzed only if their basal left ventricular developed pressure was ≥ 80 mmHg. Experiments were done in the constant flow setting without external electrical pacing. The rate pressure product (RPP = HR × LVP) was evaluated afterwards [20].

Cardiomyocyte isolation

Wistar rats weighing 250–300 g were used to isolate cardiac cells. Animals were heparinized and anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (1000 U/kg and 100 mg/kg i.p, respectively) before removal and hanging the heart. Following a gold standard technique [38, 60], hearts were mounted on a Langendorff apparatus and then perfused with Tyrode medium (TM) in mM: 128 NaCl, 0.4 NaH2PO4, 6 glucose, 5.4 KCl, 0.5 MgCl-6H2O, 5 creatinine, 5 taurine, and 25 HEPES, pH 7.4 at 37 °C for 5 min and digested by 0.1% collagenase type II (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ) dissolved in TM for 15 min. Ventricles were dissected and cells mechanically disaggregated. Cardiomyocytes were washed in crescent concentrations of Ca2+ (0.25, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mM) plus 0.1% albumin contained in the TM. Cells were used for experiments only if the isolation yielded at least 70% of rod shape cells.

Mitochondria isolation

Mitochondria were isolated from rat hearts as follows: heart tissue was minced and homogenized in cold mitochondrial isolation medium (in mM: 125 KCl, 1 EDTA, and 10 HEPES-HCl; pH 7.3). The mitochondrial fraction was obtained by differential centrifugation using the protease Nagarse, as previously described [10].

Presence of nanoSiO2 in heart and mitochondria

Electron microscopy was used to assess the presence of nanoSiO2 in heart tissue and in mitochondria of isolated cardiomyocytes. For nanoSiO2 in heart tissue, after ex vivo heart perfusion, a sample from the apex of the heart was taken for silicon (Si) quantification in a Scanning Electron Microscopy coupled with an Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy detector (SEM-EDS) (Hitachi SEM1510). Analyzed areas were selected randomly. Samples were coated with a conductive layer previous to SEM-EDS measurements. For the assessment of nanoSiO2, in isolated cardiomyocyte mitochondria, cardiomyocytes were incubated during 24 h with 100 μg/mL of nanoSiO2. Then, they were detached from the laminin-coated cell culture plates, and prepared for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) on grids using critical point drying with CO2. Samples were then stained with uranyl acetate and analyzed the ultrastructure of mitochondria. Presence of nanoSiO2 was observed in dark field as electron-dense spots and corroborated by TEM-EDS (JEOL 2010F).

Calcium retention capacity (CRC)

The CRC is a functional assessment of the sensitivity of the (mPTP) opening to mitochondrial Ca2+ overload and was evaluated by monitoring the absorbance of Calcium Green-5 N (CaG-5 N) as a Ca2+ indicator. Briefly, 300 μg of mitochondria were resuspended in 500 μL of respiration buffer (RB) containing in mM the following: 150 sucrose, 50 KCl, 2 KH2PO4, 20 Tris-HCl pH 7.3, 5 succinate, 2 μg/mL rotenone, 1 μM CsA, 0.3 μM CG-5 N salt-free (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). CG-5 N fluorescence (λex 485 nm/λem 528 nm) was monitored at 25 °C at basal conditions, then 10 μM Ca2+ boluses were added. CRC was estimated as the sum of uptaken Ca2+, reflected by the decrease in fluorescence at each bolus. Experiments were done with constant agitation using a microplate fluorescence spectrophotometer Synergy HT (BioTek Instruments,Winooski, VT, USA).

Mitochondrial respiration and membrane potential (ΔΨm)

Mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and membrane potential (ΔΨm) were measured in parallel with an Oroboros Oxygraph-2 k. The experiments were carried out in respiration assay medium containing in mM: 125 KCl, 10 HEPES-HCl, and 3 KH2PO4 with pH 7.3. State 4 respiration was measured in the presence of 10 mM succinate-rotenone, and state 3 respiration was evaluated after addition of 100 μM ADP. Maximal respiration was determined with 0.08 μM of carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazine (CCCP) [8]. The mitochondrial membrane potential was measured in parallel by fluorometry using 5 μM safranine [39]. Recordings were done simultaneously, mitochondrial respiration and ΔΨm, during 15 min: 5 min exposed to nanoSiO2, followed by substrate-triggered mitochondrial activity during 10 min. The mitochondrial respiration, state 3 or 4, was analyzed as the maximal slope after addition of substrate. The ΔΨm was calculated as the maximal difference in arbitrary fluorescence between the stable state with succinate, and the addition of carbonyl cyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenylhydrazone (FCCP).

Oxidative stress

Mitochondrial oxidative stress was measured by aconitase enzyme activity and free thiol content. Posterior to nanoSiO2 exposure, and after a single Ca2+ bolus stimulus, similar to the procedure described in the CRC methods section, mitochondria were taken right after the treated group stopped mitochondrial Ca2+ transport, yet the control group was still transporting Ca2+ into the mitochondria.

Aconitase enzyme activity was measured by monitoring the rate of conversion of cis-aconitate, intermediate product from L-citrate at 25 °C at 240 nm using a spectrophotometer microplate reader Synergy HT (BioTek Instrument, Winooski, VT, USA) [65]. Briefly, 80 μg of isolated rat heart mitochondria were added to a total of 0.1 ml of respiration buffer (RB) with 0.01% Triton X-100 at pH 7.8. The reaction was initiated by the addition of in mM: 2 MnCl2 and 5 sodium citrate. An extinction coefficient for cis-aconitate of 3.6 mM− 1 was used to express the enzymatic activity as the formation of nmol cis-aconitate/min mg protein.

Free thiol content was measured by Ellman’s reagent, 5,5′-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) as previously described [23]. In brief, 200 μg of isolated rat heart mitochondria were suspended in respiration buffer (RB), after 300 μM of DTNB was added and samples were incubated in dark for 10 min at 25 °C. Afterwards, samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. Absorbance was read using 100 μL of the supernatant at 412 nm. N-acetylcysteine was used as a standard.

Fluorescent labeling of thiols in mitochondria

Mitochondrial protein was concentrated to 10 mg/mL in Tris-HCl 0.2 M pH 7.2, EDTA 1 mM, SDS 1%, to expose all thiols to eosin maleimide labeling (100 mM, 10 min, at 4 °C in dark). Reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 mM DTT and further diluted in Laemmli buffer for SDS-PAGE separation (100 μg/lane). Fluorescence of labelled proteins were visualized using an UV transilluminator and the UVP image document system for the acquisition. Optical density from the 30 kDa band corresponding to the labelled ANT was normalized to the total protein load by Coomassie staining.

Cell culture, viability and oxidative stress assessments

Neonatal rat ventricular myoblast H9c2 cell line (CRL-1446) was purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, D7777) and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Biowest, Riverside, MO, USA) and 1x penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, Dún Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland) in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and 95% air.

Cell viability was assessed by the Alamar blue viability test (Life Technologies, Carslbad, CA). In brief, H9c2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 1 × 104 cells/well and 24 h later were treated with increasing doses of nanoSiO2. Viability and IC50 were assessed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h in a microplate fluorescence spectrophotometer Synergy HT (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA).

Cellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by nanoSiO2 exposure, through hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) assessment were quantified in H9c2 cells, as recently reported [39]. Cells were stained with Amplex Red (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In brief, cells were detached with Trypsin (L0931, Biowest, Missouri, USA), then the cells were recovered by centrifugation and resuspended in a respiratory medium (in mM): 150 sucrose, 50 KCl, 2 KH2PO4, 20 Tris-HCl, pH 7.3 with 40 μM digitonin, 50 μM Amplex Red and 1.5 U/mL Horseradish peroxidase. Measurements were done using a microplate fluorescence spectrophotometer Synergy HT (BioTek Instruments,Winooski, VT, USA).

ATP measurement

ATP was measured using the Cell Titer Glow kit (Promega) in isolated ventricle myocytes (104 cells) after 24 h exposure to nanoSiO2 at LD50, and in ventricle tissue after perfusion of nanoSiO2 in the isolated heart. Cells or N2 frozen-grinded tissue in p96 well format were lysed according to the manufacturer instruction to record the luminescence derived from the ATP-dependent luciferase activity, using a microplate luminometer. ATP was quantified using a standard curve and normalized to the total protein in the sample.

Measurement of oxygen consumption rates in human induced pluripotent stem cells cardiomyocytes

Oxygen consumption rates (OCR) were measured as previously described [52]. In brief, human induced pluripotent stem cells cardiomyocytes, which will be referred as human cardiac cells through the manuscript, were seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well in a Seahorse XF96 Cell Culture Microplate. Once attached, human cardiac cells were treated with 3 different concentrations of nanoSiO2 at 10, 100 and 500 μg/mL for 24 h and OCR was analyzed using a Seahorse XFe96 analyzer (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Prior to initiation of the assay, cardiomyocyte maintenance media was replaced with XF Media and during measurements of OCR, oligomycin (2.5 μM), FCCP (1 μM) and rotenone/antimycin A (2.5 μM) was sequentially injected into the system. The assay was repeated with two independent rounds of cardiomyocyte differentiation with each group consisting 11–13 wells. OCR readings were normalized to total protein content of each well.

Culture, differentiation and viability assessment of human induced pluripotent stem cells cardiomyocytes

Cardiomyocytes were derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells cardiomyocytes as previously described with modifications [28, 35]. Briefly, Human iPS-Foreskin-2 cell line, kindly provided by James A. Thomson (University of Wisconsin) [63], were maintained on vitronectin-coated plates in TeSR-E8 medium (Stem Cell Technologies, VA, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For directed cardiac differentiation, iPSCs were dissociated into single cells and seeded onto Matrigel (Corning, MA, USA) coated plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells/cm2 in TeSR-E8 medium supplemented with 10 μM Y− 27,632 (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK). After 2 days when the cells were 100% confluent, which is referred to as day 0, medium was replaced with RPMI 1640 basal medium containing B-27 without insulin supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific, VIC, Australia), growth factor reduced Matrigel (1:60 dilution) and 10 μM CHIR99021 (Cayman Chemical, MI, USA). After 24 h, medium was replaced with RPMI 1640 basal medium containing B-27 without insulin supplement for 24 h. At day 2, the medium was changed to RPMI 1640 basal medium containing B-27 without insulin supplement and 5 μM IWP2 (Tocris Bioscience) for 72 h. From day 5 onwards, cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 basal medium containing B-27 supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 200 μg/mL L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate sesquimagnesium salt hydrate (Sigma-Aldrich). At day 12, cardiomyocytes were dissociated into single cells and seeded onto Matrigel coated 96-well plates at a density of 1.5 × 105 cells/cm2 in DMEM/F-12 GlutaMAX medium supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 50 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin and 10 μM Y− 27,632. From days 14–19, cardiomyocytes were enriched by culture in glucose-free DMEM medium containing 4 mM lactate (Sigma-Aldrich). Purified cardiomyocytes were maintained in RPMI 1640 basal medium containing B-27 supplement and 200 μg/mL L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate sesquimagnesium salt hydrate.

Human cardiac cells were treated with increasing doses of nanoSiO2 in absence or presence of 0.5 μM CsA (Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h. Cell viability was assessed by the Pierce LDH Cytotoxicity Assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and by fluorescence microscopy as previously described [55]. For fluorescence microscopy, cells were stained with 1 μg/mL of propidium iodide and 3 μg/mL Hoechst 33258 at the end of 24 h treatment with nanoSiO2 for 15 min at 37 °C. The number of dead cells (as indicated by propidium iodide positive) was counted and expressed as a percentage over total number of cells (Hoechst 33258 positive). At least 300 cells were counted per group for each independent experiment.

Statistical analysis

All measurements were performed at least in 3 independent experiments, reporting the average value and the standard error of the mean (SEM), unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance was compared between groups with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Tukey or Kruskal Wallis post hoc analysis when appropriate.

Results

nanoSiO2 impairs relaxation on the ex vivo heart

The nanoparticles were characterized in terms of hydrodynamic diameter and ζ-potential in the Krebs-Henseleit buffer for the ex vivo experiments, following a specific inbubation protocol [24, 42]. The results are summarized in Table 1, showing a 3-fold agglomeration in the hydrodynamic diameter, while the ζ-potential remained mostly unaltered. This implies that the particles to which cardiac tissue was exposed in ex vivo experiments are an agglomeration of NPs. In addition, the SSA of the nanoSiO2 was assessed, resulting in 305.94 m2/g when analyzed by the BET theory or 470.50 m2/g by the Langmuir theory, differing from the reported SSA of 350–410 m2/g by the manufacturer.

Table 1 nanoSiO2 characterization in different aqueous media. Values are presented relative to those of nanoSiO2 in ultrapure H2O, 91 ± 22 nm for hydrodynamic diameter and − 27.1 ± 4.4 mV for ζ-potential, respectively as previously reported [24]
Full size table

The effect of nanoSiO2 perfusion on cardiac function was studied in isolated rat hearts. Exposing the perfused hearts to 100 μg/mL resulted in accumulation on the apex, as evidenced in Fig. 1a. The RPP response was evaluated during 60 min using Krebs-Henseleit buffer with or without nanoSiO2, see Fig. 1b. The perfused group with nanoSiO2, with respect to the NT group, showed a sigmoidal dose-dependent activity with an IC50 of 92.7 ± 46.3 μg/mL, see Fig. 1c. Such reduced relaxation was reflected in the reduced HR of ~ 150 bpm in hearts treated with nanoSiO2 with respect to ~ 300 bpm of the NT group, see middle panels of Fig. 1d. Parameters like LVP and dP/dt were not affected in amplitude, see upper and lower panels of Fig. 1d. However, some LVP maxima were smaller for the nanoSiO2 treated group and their frequency were halved. Remarkably, relaxation rate (−dP/dt) was reduced 17%, suggesting an energetic impairment, as relaxation is the ATP demanding process in cardiac cycle. The results are summarized in Table 2. Under acute nanoSiO2 treatment, histopathology assessment of cardiac tissue after exposure did not reveal notable structural alterations, necrosis, signs of inflammation or rhabdomyolysis, suggesting that metabolic impairment proceeds to tissue disarrangement, see supplementary Fig. 1. Therefore, alterations in cardiac relaxation were found proportional to increased doses of nanoSiO2 perfusion, which may be associated with an increased NP accumulation in the cardiac tissue.

Fig. 1
figure1

nanoSiO2 accumulates in heart tissue, diminishing contractility and affecting predominantly LVP and HR. a Silicon quantification in myocardial tissue by SEM-EDS after 100 μg/mL nanoSiO2 perfusion in ex-vivo heart. b, c Heart rate pressure product (RPP = HR × LVP) during 60 min after time- and dose- dependent nanoSiO2 administration. d The RRP dependence on nanoSiO2 administration reduced the frequency, and in some cases the amplitude of LVP and dP/dt, in addition a reduced HR. Values are percentage of control and represent mean ± SEM, n = 4

Full size image
Table 2 Ex vivo perfused hearts with nanoSiO2, present reduced RPP, LVP and HR and –dP/dt
Full size table

Isolated mitochondria exposed to nanoSiO2 present dysfunction due to the opening of the mPTP

Once the accumulation of nanoSiO2 on cardiac tissue and its effects on reduced cardiac relaxation were evidenced, direct exposure to mitochondria was studied in order to elucidate the toxicity mechanism. In cardiomyocytes, TEM micrographs present nanoSiO2 accumulation in mitochondria, see supplementary Figure 2. For the experiments with mitochondria, nanoSiO2 was characterized in terms of hydrodynamic diameter and ζ-potential in the respiration buffer, prepared similarly as the characterization for the ex vivo experiments. The results are presented in Table 1, showing a 27% reduction of hydrodynamic diameter, while the ζ-potential remained mostly unaltered.

To this, isolated mitochondria from rat heart were treated with several doses of nanoSiO2, ranging from 1 to 400 μg/mL. The OCR was reduced directly proportionally to the applied dose, showing less sensitivity to the addition of substrates for ETC complex II, see Fig. 2a. State 4 presented an IC50 140.9 ± 13.63 μg/mL versus of nanoSiO2, respectively; while state 3 showed a more sensitive decrease with an IC50 of 24.9 ± 7.5 μg/mL of nanoSiO2, respectively, see Fig. 2b. This reduction in OCR capacity with increased nanoSiO2 exposure was accompanied by a reduction in Δψm, see Fig. 2c, presenting an IC50 of 24.4 ± 2.15, as shown in Fig. 2d. When mitochondria of human cardiomyocytes were treated with nanoSiO2, 500 μg/mL was found to have the most negative effect, 40% reduction, on oxygen consumption rate (OCR), see Fig. 2e. Although the reduction in basal OCR at 24-h post-treatment was not statistically significant, the maximum OCR (Untreated vs 500 μg/mL; 21.4 ± 5.50 vs 12.2 ± 6.00; p = 0.0009) and spare reserve (Untreated vs 500 μg/mL; 17.5 ± 5.80 vs 9.46 ± 7.43; p = 0.0104) was significantly reduced following treatment at 500 μg/mL in comparison to the untreated group, see Fig. 2f. Additionally, cardiac mitochondria exposed to increased doses of nanoSiO2 resulted with a lower mitochondrial calcium retention capacity (CRC), see Fig. 3a. The IC50 was estimated as 66.85 μg/mL, see Fig. 3c. The addition of a potent retardant of mPTP (CsA) partially recovered dose-dependent the CRC, about two-fold when 100 μg/mL of nanoSiO2 were administered, see Fig. 3b and d. The use of CsA delayed mitochondrial depolarization, as assessed by the ΔΨm in Fig. 3e, and reduced mitochondrial swelling as observed in Fig. 3f. These results indicate the mPTP may be associated in the deleterious effects caused by nanoSiO2.

Fig. 2
figure2

Exposure to nanoSiO2 to rat and human cardiac mitochondria results in mitochondrial dysfunction, observed by a reduced oxygen consumption rate and mitochondrial membrane potential. For rat cardiomyocyte mitochondria (a-d), at incremental nanoSiO2 concentrations: a Representative recordings of OCR. Addition of succinate and ADP are denoted by arrows. b Decrease of OCR evaluated in state 4 and state 3. c Representative recordings of ΔΨm. Addition of succinate and ADP are denoted by arrows. d Decrease of ΔΨm. For human cardiomyocyte mitochondria, at incremental nanoSiO2 concentrations: e Representative recordings of OCR. Addition of oligomycin, FCCP, rotenone and Antimycin A are denoted by dashed lines. f Basal and maximum OCR, and spare reserve. The exposure of mitochondria to nanoSiO2 was 5 min prior to measurements. Values represent mean ± SEM

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

nanoSiO2 promotes mitochondrial membrane permeability associated to mPTP opening. a-b Representative recordings of mitochondrial CRC at increasing concentrations: (a) as a function of nanoSiO2, and (b) as a function of CsA. Arrows represent 10 μM Ca2+ bolus addition. c-d Semiquantitative analysis of CRC: (c) as a function of nanoSiO2, and (d) as a function of CsA. e-f Representative recordings of: (e) mitochondrial depolarization, and (f) swelling in presence and absence of CsA. The exposure of mitochondria to nanoSiO2 was 5 min prior to measurements. The concentration of nanoSiO2 in (b,d-f) was 100 μg/mL. CsA was applied at the same time of nanoSiO2 administration. Values are percentage of control and represent mean ± SEM

Full size image

nanoSiO2 drive the mPTP through oxidative stress and thiol oxidation of the adenine nucleotide translocase

Mitochondria exposed to 30 μg/mL of nanoSiO2 induced the mPTP opening by Ca2+, as observed in Fig. 4a. In addition, aconitase activity was reduced by 41% after nanoSiO2 exposure, see Fig. 4b. Presence of thiol groups were similarly reduced 52%, see Fig. 4c. Finally, 53% less reduced thiol groups in the ADP/ATP translocase were found after NP exposure, see Fig. 4d. These results point towards oxidation damage as the toxicity mechanism of nanoSiO2 and confirm the involvement of the mPTP in this process. Given the damage may be mediated by the production of ROS, MitoTEMPO was used as a specific mitochondrial antioxidant agent, applied 30 min previous nanoSiO2 administration. The protective effect of MitoTEMPO on the mPTP was observed in a dose-dependent manner, see Fig. 4a. When nanoSiO2 triggered damage, mitochondria were treated with 25 μM of MitoTEMPO, finding that the aconitase activity, free thiols groups, and thiols in the ADP/ATP traslocase were partially recovered, see Fig. 4a-d, confirming the hypothesis that ROS is involved in the nanotoxicity of nanoSiO2. Such recoveries were correlated with a recovery in the mitochondrial selective permeability.

Fig. 4
figure4

nanoSiO2 disturbs mitochondrial enzymatic activity and promote the oxidation of mitochondrial proteins. MitoTEMPO, a mitochondrial antioxidant, partially prevents nanoSiO2 oxidation effects. a Representative recordings of mitochondrial calcium transport in nanoSiO2 (30 μg/mL) incubated in mitochondria after the addition of 10 μM Ca2+. MitoTEMPO improved mitochondrial calcium transport. b Aconitase enzyme activity, c free thiol content, and d mitochondrial thiols in the ANT interlinked by n-ethylmaleimide (NEM) binding in isolated heart mitochondria after nanoSiO2 treatment (30 μg/mL) in presence or absence of MitoTEMPO (25 μM). The exposure of mitochondria to nanoSiO2 was 5 min prior to measurements. MitoTEMPO was applied 30 min prior to nanoSiO2 administration. Values are percentage of control and represent mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05 vs control, #p ≤ 0.05 vs SNP. e Schematic interaction of NEM with SH groups in proteins

Full size image

Blocking the mPTP results in better cardiac cell fate

In cardiomyoblasts, exposure to 24 h of nanoSiO2 resulted in improved viability when treated with MitoTEMPO, applied 30 min previous nanoSiO2 administration, see Fig. 5a. Treatment with ≥ 100 μg/mL of MitoTEMPO resulted in 33% higher viability. Similarly, H2O2 was exacerbated 27% with nanoSiO2, and was quenched to control levels with the addition of MitoTEMPO, see Fig. 5b. Exploring whether the blocking the mPTP with CsA would yield similar results to those of MitoTEMPO, cardiomyocytes were subjected to different doses of nanoSiO2, evaluating their viability 24 h later, see Fig. 5c. CsA was applied 30 min before administration of nanoSiO2. An IC50 of 79.7 ± 13.2 was found for nanoSiO2 exposure, which increased 2.5-fold when treated with CsA. ATP production, when exposed to the IC50 of nanoSiO2, was reduced down to 32.4%, and consequently was rescued significantly up to 67% when CsA was applied, see Fig. 5d. When human cardiomyocytes were treated with increasing doses of nanoSiO2, LDH release increased with higher NP doses, and similarly the onset of necrosis through PI staining commenced from 3 μg/mL and increased in a dose dependent manner, reaching 85 and 48%, respectively, see Fig. 5e and f, respectively. These results indicate that preventing the mechanisms of toxicity of nanoSiO2 in the mitochondria result in improved outcome for cardiac cells.

Fig. 5
figure5

The toxicity mechanism of nanoSiO2 in cardiac cells is driven by reactive oxygen species and the opening of the mPTP. a MitoTEMPO dose-dependent cellular death prevention with 200 μg/mL of nanoSiO2 administration in H9c2 cells. b H2O2 production after nanoSiO2 administration (200 μg/mL) in presence or absence of MitoTEMPO (100 μM) in H9c2 cells. c Cellular viability in ventricular myocytes after nanoSiO2 administration in the absence or presence of CsA (0.5 μM). d ATP production in cardiomyocytes after nanoSiO2 administration (100 μg/mL) in absence or presence of CsA (0.5 μM). For human cardiomyocytes: (e) LDH release activity, (f) PI positive cells. MitoTEMPO or CsA were applied 30 min prior to nanoSiO2 administration. nanoSiO2 was incubated during 24 h. Values are percentage of control and represent mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05 vs control, #p ≤ 0.05 vs CsA

Full size image

Discussion

The toxicity of nanoSiO2 has been a concern due to their current wide industrial applications, such as an anti-caking agent in food products, and potential new areas such as biotechnological and biomedical applications. Amorphous SiO2 has been reported to elicit less toxicity in vitro or in vivo than its crystalline counterparts, and most nanotoxicity studies have been performed in amorphous nanoSiO2 [44]. Specifically, in cardiomyocyte research, nanoSiO2 has been reported only in relation to nanotoxicology rather than applications [40]. For NPs in general, particle size and particle number are the major drivers of a toxicological response. Regarding nanoSiO2, morphology and surface charge are the major toxicity response drivers [5]. A dominant factor in the toxicity of silica particles is the generation of ROS from the silica surface. In a recent study, Lehman et al. [36] reported that the amount of ROS species should be a function of the number of Si—OH. Therefore, toxicity of silica can be studied in terms of the surface chemistry, as defined by the assembly of siloxane (Si—O—Si) and silanol (Si—OH) groups that are bundled together to form a particle. A straightforward calculation for nanoparticles with a surface area of 380 m2/g (like those used in the present study) indicates that the concentration of hydroxyl groups is in the order of 104 pmol OH/μg, based on a previous report of the of OH concentration in amorphous silica [49]. This result suggests that such a large amount of OH groups can be responsible for promoting several cellular reactions. For instance, the nucleophilic behavior of the silanol oxygen can also encourage the attack of electrophilic carbonyl groups, which are present in several proteins. Moreover, at physiological conditions (pH = 7.4) such terminal silanols can be deprotonated to form the silicate anion (Si—O−), which can further interact with cell membranes via electrostatic interactions [3]. Silica-derived ROS can lead to cellular oxidative stress that may be enhanced in the case it is nanosized owing to the greater surface area and therefore higher concentration of reactive groups. The increased production has been associated in vitro principally to an increased presence of ROS and through reduced GSH [24, 37], and producing cellular membrane damage through lipid peroxidation [2, 62]. In vivo exposure to nanoSiO2 is associated with inflammation through cytokine production and chemokine production [33]. It is worth noting that nanoSiO2 with a higher crystallinity, such as α-quartz, presents more toxicity than amorphous NPs [44]. This is likely due to the higher availability of silanol groups.

Exposure studies of nanoSiO2 in relation to its cardiovascular effects have been recently widely reported. For example, regarding in vivo studies, in old Sprague-Dawley rats, inhalation of 38 nm nanoSiO2 led to increased anoxic tissue, presence of troponin c in serum, and produced an incomplete atrioventricular heart block [6]. On the other hand, after nanoSiO2 intratracheal instillation, rats treated with 10 mg/kg of the nanoSiO2 (30, 60 and 90 nm) showed levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1beta (IL-1β) and 6 (IL-6). Moreover, a significant decrease in nitric oxide production with elevated levels of intercellular adhesion molecule-l and vascular cell adhesion molecule-l suggested early steps of endothelial dysfunction [13]. Recently, it was observed that after nanoSiO2 intratracheal instillation, the descending aorta velocity was decreased 30%, concomitant with reduction in the cardiac output in nanoSiO2-treated group [19], indicating that nanoSiO2 in vivo alters cardiac hemodynamics. However, the precise mechanisms of this modification in cardiac output needs to be clarified. In this context, in zebrafish embryos pericardial edema and bradycardia were observed after a low dose intravenous injection of 106 nm nanoSiO2, due to downregulation of Ca2+ signaling genes [15]. VEGFR2-mediated autophagy in endothelial cells and pericytes was observed in ICR mice after a single intravenous dose > 100 mg/kg of 62 nm nanoSiO2 [16]. These mechanisms, in addition to apoptosis, were observed in Kupffer and HepG2 cells [64]. Similarly, in vitro, 24 h exposure of cardiomyoblasts up to 200 μg/mL of nanoSiO2 resulted in mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis along with a reduction in gap junction intercellular communication [14]. With respect to intracellular Ca2+ dynamics, adult rat cardiomyocytes exposed 24 h to 100 μg/mL nanoSiO2, of similar preparation and physicochemical properties as this study, resulted in alterations to Ca2+ handling and reduced cell shortening [24]. These changes were associated with increased intracellular H2O2 and reduced Δψm and ATP production. Similarly, ROS and mitochondrial dysfunction were observed in HUVEC cells exposed to 57 nm nanoSiO2 in 12.5–100 μg/mL, in addition to an observed reduced activity of the Na+/K+-, Ca2+-, and Ca2+/Mg2+- ATPases, mitochondrial fragmentation through the increase of FIS1/DRP1/Mfn2 and reduction of OPA1 proteins, and inhibited mitochondrial biogenesis via PGC-1a-NRF1-TFAM signaling [26]. To this body of knowledge regarding the toxicity cardiac impact of nanoSiO2, there is a lack of evidence regarding the functional impact of nanoSiO2 from a subcellular or organelle perspective, which could unveil the toxicity mechanism of nanoSiO2 that may link subcellular effects with cellular and tissue occurrences. Thus, the aim of this work is to present a mechanistic view on the effects of nanoSiO2 exposure directly on rat heart mitochondria, its effects on the function of ex vivo perfused and exposed rat hearts, and its possible mechanism of interaction with cardiac cells.

Reduced cardiac contraction, as observed in this study and others [19] due to exposure of nanoSiO2, can lead to reduced cardiac output. If this effect is sustained, then chronic cardiomyopathy is feasible, which may lead to heart failure. The amount of nanoSiO2 that reduced the relaxation of ex vivo hearts down to IC50 was estimated on average as 93 μg/mL, very close to the reported average of 99 μg/mL IC50 viability of adult rat cardiomyocytes [24]. Compared to other mitochondrial prooxidant molecules exposed under similar conditions to ex vivo hearts, the t50 present a similar value of 30 min [60]. Metabolic inhibition, either by depravation of substrates or reduction of the PO2 in the extracellular fluid, reduce the oxidative phosphorylation and the ATP availability. The sinoatrial node in the right atrium is the muscle cell mass responsible for the pacemaker activity. The resting membrane potential is rapidly recovered due, in part, to the opening of the K+ ATP (Kir6.X) channels, which may open after the energy-demanding relaxation where low ATP, or high intracellular ADP, activate the channels to repolarize [46]. Hypoxia and uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation reduce the availability of ATP, increasing the current density of Kir6.2 that may lead to hyperpolarization and reduced excitability to decrease the fire rate in the pacemaker [4, 22]. This work shows that the direct administration of nanoSiO2 into the extracellular fluid of the isolated rat heart decreased in a dose dependent manner the RPP with a clear effect over the heart rate. Further examination demonstrated that nanoSiO2 accumulate within mitochondria to uncouple oxidative phosphorylation and reduce ATP availability. Hence, these events may have prompted the sustained opening of the Kir6.2 channels to reduce the heart rate, a survival mechanism described elsewhere during metabolic inhibition and ischemia [4, 25, 32]. Studies on the effects of cardiac contraction due to nanoparticle exposure are scarce [40]. In adult rat cardiomyocytes exposed during 24 h to the same nanoSiO2 as this study, a reduction in contractility, assessed by reduced cell shortening, was reported. The molecular bases of this contractile dysfunction are linked to longer SERCA Ca2+ recapture times, reduced Ca2+ sparks and specially a reduction in the Ca2+ content in the lumen of SERCA. This depletion of Ca2+ levels intra-reticulum is associated to a lower mitochondrial ATP production due to increased oxidative stress in the cells [24]. In zebrafish when exposed to nanoSiO2, a downregulation in genes of SERCA, calcium channel, and cardiac troponin C, as well as a decrease in the protein TNNT2 led the authors to speculate a potential reduction in cardiac contraction [15]. Recently, a study of nanoSiO2 exposure to Sprague-Dawley rats in a subacute administration via intratracheal instillation, found an increased dose-dependence effect in reduced ventricular function indicated by left ventricular ejection fraction and shortening [18]. These results are in agreement with the results here reported of dose-dependence ex vivo heart functional contractility. Reduction in contractility has been found with the exposure of other nanoparticles. For example, 24 h exposure to 100 μg/mL of 21 nm TiO2 NPs resulted in reduced contractility in adult rat ventricular cardiomyocytes [30]. Even short-term exposure to 25–35 nm TiO2 NPs in adult rat ventricular cardiomyocytes led to reduced contractility, yet showed increased spontaneous contractions [58]. Oral administration of colloidal Ag NPs in other animal experimental models also resulted in reduced myocardial contractility [51]. In spontaneously hypertensive rats exposed to subchronic intratracheal instillation of 25–35 nm TiO2 NPs, the isovolumic contraction time was found increased [56]. Therefore, it seems that a general consequence of inorganic NP exposure is the alteration of relaxation properties of the heart as we observed in this study. This is relevant to the proposed mechanism in this work, given that the process of relaxation and heart chamber filling is more energetically demanding and where alterations in mitochondrial function show with more clarity these phenotypes [54].

Mitochondria from heart tissue were exposed to nanoSiO2 for the first time in order to elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which the energetic state of rat cardiomyocytes deteriorated [24]. Impairment of OCR and reduction of ΔΨm was observed with a dose-dependent response at exposures higher than 1 μg/mL in rat cardiomyocytes. Similar effects were found on human cardiomyocyte mitochondria. The dissipation of the ΔΨm, required for ATP synthesis, resulted in a reduction of 30% in ATP content with respect to untreated mitochondria. Such reduction in ATP is in line with previous reports, corroborating the alterations of the cardiomyocyte Ca2+ dynamics in active transport compartments [24]. These deleterious effects were at least driven directly by internalization of nanoSiO2 into the mitochondria. Uptake mechanisms of nanosized SiO2 have been reported through endocytosis [61] or passive diffusion [43], it could be speculated that nanoSiO2 uptake to mitochondria may be driven through passive diffusion. Their interaction with nanoSiO2 clearly showed a state of selective permeability loss of the internal mitochondrial membrane which explains the effect on the loss of ΔΨm and ATP synthesis. The effect of selective permeability was associated with the mPTP opening given that CsA addition resulted in a reduction on the ΔΨm loss and mitochondrial swelling. The partial reduction in mitochondrial selective permeability could be attributed to the internalization of nanoSiO2 which could be affecting it by interaction with the organelle with or without altering its structure [26].

The reasons for mPTP opening under nanoSiO2 exposure on mitochondria were explored, finding reduced aconitase activity and thiol content in mitochondria as the cause of oxidative stress. Aconitase is a well-known enzyme used to assess the damage by anion superoxide (O2−) [59]. On the other hand, total thiol groups decreased, suggesting there are processes related to cellular death, this is because thiol groups play a critical role in redox signaling by dragging between oxidized and reduced states in cardiac mitochondria [9]. In this regard, the oxidation of critical cysteines related with ANT thiol groups has been shown to be an important event of the Ca2+-induced mPTP opening. Here, using mitochondrial thiols interlinked by n-ethylmaleimide (NEM), it was observed a reduction in binding when nanoSiO2 triggered oxidative stress. This result indicates that the ANT-Cys56 has been affected by oxidation of thiols, because ANT-Cys56 is the site of interaction of NEM, modifying the translator in cardioprotective conformation to the mitochondrial matrix side that reduce the Ca2+-induced mPTP [27]. Remarkably, the mitochondrial antoxidant MitoTEMPO, under the same NP exposure conditions, delayed the opening of the mPTP and prevented the NT-Cys56 oxidation. These results make emphasis on the mechanism of mPTP opening, given that the ANT is one of the main components of the molecular structure of the mPTP [27].

Given this oxidation mechanism and the mitochondrial protection using an antioxidant agent, it was sought to demonstrate whether such protection could be translated as in improved protection in a cellular model, to this adult rat cardiomyocytes or rat cardiomyoblasts were used and exposed to nanoSiO2 in the presence of MitoTEMPO. It was found that MitoTEMPO rescued viability 20%, and reduced H2O2. These results taken together points that cardiac tissue exposure to nanoSiO2 promote the oxidation of diverse mitochondrial components. In this sense it could be proposed the use of mitochondrial antioxidants directed towards cardiac tissue [39]. In adult rat and human cardiomyocytes, the use of CsA clearly improved cellular viability and rescued ATP production. Another strategy to reduce the effects of nanoSiO2 exposure may be the use of blockers of the opening of the mPTP, such as CsA which can be administered nanoencapsulated [29]. The proposed mechanisms of this work are summarized in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure6

nanoSiO2 induces an increase in mitochondrial ROS production, leading to dysfunction in cardiac contractility. Hearts perfused with nanoSiO2 showed a compromised contractility, finding nanoSiO2 accumulation (heart representation, left side). Once nanoSiO2 internalizes into mitochondria, production of ROS is increased, compromising mitochondrial function. This leads to several oxidative damages, reducing the activity of the aconitase, and affecting the activity of key mitochondrial proteins such ANT through the oxidation of thiol groups. ANT oxidation promotes the mPTP formation, causing a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential, which is the electrochemical force to synthetize ATP, compromising cellular viability. MitoTempo, a mitochondrial antioxidant agent, or CsA through delaying the formation of the mPTP, partially prevented these adverse effects of nanoSiO2 exposure

Full size image

Finally, it is of our concern the occupational exposure to NPs, especially those individuals with a cardiovascular disease. Recent work has shown that NP exposure exacerbates the cardiovascular damage, such as nanoSiO2 induced alterations associated to contractile dysfunction [15, 18] or pathophysiological conditions in which there is an increase of oxidative stress, such as myocardial ischemia or angina [39, 48]. In this context, the tissue of patients will have higher susceptibility, which could trigger not only a lower dose cytotoxicity, but will likely provoke a non-conventional toxicity mechanism in specific scenarios of the disease, for example a patient with heart failure or cardiac hypertrophy [21]. This is a relevant group given that it has been reported that their hearts can present enhanced extravasation and accumulation of NPs in the cardiomyocytes [57]. Considering this scenario, other cardiovascular conditions such as diabetic cardiomyopathy intensified their cardiotoxicity of metallic NPs which affected the perfusion pressure and LVP [53], as well as the exposure to TiO2 NPs in spontaneously hypertensive rats [56]. Based on this information, it is of utmost importance to develop in the near future studies that stratify the increased risk that patients with cardiomyopathies might present due to NP exposure.

It should be noted that the current study present limitations regarding the range of doses and exposure conditions. Firstly, doses of 100 μg/mL or higher of nanoSiO2 are unlikely to reach the bloodstream as an acute exposure, therefore the effects of this NP may not be as evident as here presented. Another aspect is the actual nanoentity that will interact with cardiac tissue regarding size and surface coating (the protein corona) based on the route of exposure [41]. Even at in vitro settings it has been demonstrated changes to the physicochemical properties of NPs [17, 24], or in or ex vivo settings as here reported. Nevertheless, exposure to high concentrations of particulate matter < 2.5 μm (PM2.5) increased hazard ratios for heart disease and other ailments [50], and recent reports indicate that silicon-based nanomaterials may accumulate 14-fold higher in in hearts with hypertrophy and pathological remodeling [57]. In this context the present study may provide insight regarding occupational exposure to industries that deal heavily with nanosized silica such as artificial stone [47], semiconductors [34], or the food industry [7]. For example, some of the results here reported show clear effects at low doses, such as the percentage of PI positive cells in human CMs (Fig. 5f). Therefore, experimental design of realistic exposure conditions may provide further information regarding risk assessment and the cellular mechanisms of action of nanoSiO2. In addition, studies blocking Ca2+ uptake to the mitochondria, such as blocking the mitochondrial calcium uniporter with Ru360, may provide a more detailed view of the role of the mPTP opening upon nanoSiO2 administration.

Conclusion

Perfusion of nanoSiO2 NPs in ex vivo rat hearts resulted in a reduction of relaxation. In isolated mitochondria the interaction with nanoSiO2 generated a reduction in oxygen content and ΔΨm caused by the mPTP opening due to oxidation of thiol groups at the ANT. Studies in human cardiomyocytes corroborated the role of mPTP in the prevention of deleterious effects from nanoSiO2 exposure. Such alterations in mitochondria were partially recovered with the use of a mitochondrial antioxidant agent and its use on cardiac cells showed that cellular cardioprotection against the deleterious effects of nanoSiO2 might be achieved by preventing excessive oxidation of mitochondrial proteins and keeping the selective permeability of the internal mitochondrial membrane.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    AB, S. T. (2019). "TAR Study Investigating Performance and Safety of the Medical Device SiPore15™ [Clinical trial]. Reviewed online from U. S. National Library of Medicine Web page." Retrieved 4 March 2020, from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03823027?term=amorphous+silica&draw=2&rank=3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Akhtar MJ, Ahamed M, Kumar S, Siddiqui H, Patil G, Ashquin M, Ahmad I. Nanotoxicity of pure silica mediated through oxidant generation rather than glutathione depletion in human lung epithelial cells. Toxicology. 2010;276(2):95–102.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Al Samri MT, Biradar AV, Alsuwaidi AR, Balhaj G, Al-Hammadi S, Shehab S, Al-Salam S, Tariq S, Pramathan T, Benedict S, Asefa T, Souid A-K. In vitro biocompatibility of calcined mesoporous silica particles and fetal blood cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:3111–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Aziz Q, Finlay M, Montaigne D, Ojake L, Li Y, Anderson N, Ludwig A, Tinker A. ATP-sensitive potassium channels in the sinoatrial node contribute to heart rate control and adaptation to hypoxia. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(23):8912–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bye E, Davies R, Griffiths DM, Gylseth B, Moncrieff CB. In vitro cytotoxicity and quantitative silica analysis of diatomaceous earth products. Br J Ind Med. 1984;41(2):228–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chen Z, Meng H, Xing G, Yuan H, Zhao F, Liu R, Chang X, Gao X, Wang T, Jia G, Ye C, Chai Z, Zhao Y. Age-related differences in pulmonary and cardiovascular responses to SiO2 nanoparticle inhalation: Nanotoxicity has susceptible population. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(23):8985–92.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Contado C, Mejia J, Lozano Garcia O, Piret JP, Dumortier E, Toussaint O, Lucas S. Physicochemical and toxicological evaluation of silica nanoparticles suitable for food and consumer products collected by following the EC recommendation. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(1):271–86.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Correa F, Garcı́a N, Garcı́a G, Chavez E. Dehydroepiandrosterone as an inducer of mitochondrial permeability transition. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;87(4):279–84.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dalle-Donne I, Milzani A, Gagliano N, Colombo R, Giustarini D, Rossi R. Molecular mechanisms and potential clinical significance of S-glutathionylation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2008;10(3):445–73.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    de Garcia-Rivas J, Carvajal GK, Correa F, Zazueta C. Ru (360), a specific mitochondrial calcium uptake inhibitor, improves cardiac post-ischaemic functional recovery in rats in vivo. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;149(7):829–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    de Jesus Garcia-Rivas G, Guerrero-Hernandez A, Guerrero-Serna G, Rodriguez-Zavala JS, Zazueta C. Inhibition of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter by the oxo-bridged dinuclear ruthenium amine complex (Ru360) prevents from irreversible injury in postischemic rat heart. FEBS J. 2005;272(13):3477–88.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dekkers S, Krystek P, Peters RJ, Lankveld DP, Bokkers BG, van Hoeven-Arentzen PH, Bouwmeester H, Oomen AG. Presence and risks of nanosilica in food products. Nanotoxicology. 2011;5(3):393–405.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Du Z, Zhao D, Jing L, Cui G, Jin M, Li Y, Liu X, Liu Y, Du H, Guo C, Zhou X, Sun Z. Cardiovascular toxicity of different sizes amorphous silica nanoparticles in rats after intratracheal instillation. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2013;13(3):194–207.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Du ZJ, Cui GQ, Zhang J, Liu XM, Zhang ZH, Jia Q, Ng JC, Peng C, Bo CX, Shao H. Inhibition of gap junction intercellular communication is involved in silica nanoparticles-induced H9c2 cardiomyocytes apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:2179–88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Duan J, Yu Y, Li Y, Li Y, Liu H, Jing L, Yang M, Wang J, Li C, Sun Z. Low-dose exposure of silica nanoparticles induces cardiac dysfunction via neutrophil-mediated inflammation and cardiac contraction in zebrafish embryos. Nanotoxicology. 2016;10(5):575–85.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Duan J, Yu Y, Yu Y, Li Y, Huang P, Zhou X, Peng S, Sun Z. Silica nanoparticles enhance autophagic activity, disturb endothelial cell homeostasis and impair angiogenesis. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014;11:50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Escamilla-Rivera V, Uribe-Ramirez M, Gonzalez-Pozos S, Lozano O, Lucas S, De Vizcaya-Ruiz A. Protein corona acts as a protective shield against Fe3O4-PEG inflammation and ROS-induced toxicity in human macrophages. Toxicol Lett. 2016;240(1):172–84.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Feng L, Ning R, Liu J, Liang S, Xu Q, Liu Y, Liu W, Duan J, Sun Z. Silica nanoparticles induce JNK-mediated inflammation and myocardial contractile dysfunction. J Hazard Mater. 2020;391:122206.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Feng L, Yang X, Liang S, Xu Q, Miller MR, Duan J, Sun Z. Silica nanoparticles trigger the vascular endothelial dysfunction and prethrombotic state via miR-451 directly regulating the IL6R signaling pathway. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2019;16(1):16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fernández-Sada E, Silva-Platas C, Villegas CA, Rivero SL, Willis BC, García N, Garza JR, Oropeza-Almazán Y, Valverde CA, Mazzocchi G, Zazueta C, Torre-Amione G, García-Rivas G. Cardiac responses to β-adrenoceptor stimulation is partly dependent on mitochondrial calcium uniporter activity. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171(18):4207–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Frey N, Katus HA, Olson EN, Hill JA. Hypertrophy of the heart: a new therapeutic target? Circulation. 2004;109(13):1580–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Fukuzaki K, Sato T, Miki T, Seino S, Nakaya H. Role of sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive K+ channels in the regulation of sinoatrial node automaticity: an evaluation using Kir6.2-deficient mice. J Physiol. 2008;586(11):2767–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Garcia N, Martinez-Abundis E, Pavon N, Chavez E. On the opening of an insensitive cyclosporin a non-specific pore by phenylarsine plus mersalyl. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2007;49(2):84–90.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Guerrero-Beltran CE, Bernal-Ramirez J, Lozano O, Oropeza-Almazan Y, Castillo EC, Garza JR, Garcia N, Vela J, Garcia-Garcia A, Ortega E, Torre-Amione G, Ornelas-Soto N, Garcia-Rivas G. Silica nanoparticles induce cardiotoxicity interfering with energetic status and Ca2+ handling in adult rat cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017a;312(4):H645–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gumina RJ, Pucar D, Bast P, Hodgson DM, Kurtz CE, Dzeja PP, Miki T, Seino S, Terzic A. Knockout of Kir6.2 negates ischemic preconditioning-induced protection of myocardial energetics. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284(6):H2106–13.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Guo C, Wang J, Jing L, Ma R, Liu X, Gao L, Cao L, Duan J, Zhou X, Li Y, Sun Z. Mitochondrial dysfunction, perturbations of mitochondrial dynamics and biogenesis involved in endothelial injury induced by silica nanoparticles. Environ Pollut. 2018;236:926–36.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Halestrap AP, Brenner C. The adenine nucleotide translocase: a central component of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore and key player in cell death. Curr Med Chem. 2003;10(16):1507–25.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hoque A, Sivakumaran P, Bond ST, Ling NXY, Kong AM, Scott JW, Bandara N, Hernandez D, Liu GS, Wong RCB, Ryan MT, Hausenloy DJ, Kemp BE, Oakhill JS, Drew BG, Pebay A, Lim SY. Mitochondrial fission protein Drp1 inhibition promotes cardiac mesodermal differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018;4:39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ikeda G, Matoba T, Nakano Y, Nagaoka K, Ishikita A, Nakano K, Funamoto D, Sunagawa K, Egashira K. Nanoparticle-mediated targeting of cyclosporine a enhances Cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury through inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20467.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jawad H, Boccaccini AR, Ali NN, Harding SE. Assessment of cellular toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles for cardiac tissue engineering applications. Nanotoxicology. 2011;5(3):372–80.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jian Z, Chen Y-J, Shimkunas R, Jian Y, Jaradeh M, Chavez K, Chiamvimonvat N, Tardiff JC, Izu LT, Ross RS, Chen-Izu Y. In vivo Cannulation methods for Cardiomyocytes isolation from heart disease models. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160605.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jovanovic A, Jovanovic S, Lorenz E, Terzic A. Recombinant cardiac ATP-sensitive K+ channel subunits confer resistance to chemical hypoxia-reoxygenation injury. Circulation. 1998;98(15):1548–55.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kaewamatawong T, Shimada A, Okajima M, Inoue H, Morita T, Inoue K, Takano H. Acute and subacute pulmonary toxicity of low dose of ultrafine colloidal silica particles in mice after intratracheal instillation. Toxicol Pathol. 2006;34(7):958–65.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kaluza S, Balderhaar J, Orthen B, Honnert B, Jankowska E, Pietrowski P, Rosell M, Tanarro C, Tejedor J, Zugasti A. Workplace exposure to nanoparticles; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lees JG, Kong AM, Chen YC, Sivakumaran P, Hernandez D, Pebay A, Harvey AJ, Gardner DK, Lim SY. Mitochondrial fusion by M1 promotes Embryoid body cardiac differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:6380135.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lehman SE, Morris AS, Mueller PS, Salem AK, Grassian VH, Larsen SC. Silica nanoparticle-generated ROS as a predictor of cellular toxicity: mechanistic insights and safety by design. Environ Sci Nano. 2016;3(1):56–66.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lin W, Huang YW, Zhou XD, Ma Y. In vitro toxicity of silica nanoparticles in human lung cancer cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006;217(3):252–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Louch WE, Sheehan KA, Wolska BM. Methods in cardiomyocyte isolation, culture, and gene transfer. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;51(3):288–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lozano O, Lázaro-Alfaro A, Silva-Platas C, Oropeza-Almazán Y, Torres-Quintanilla A, Bernal-Ramírez J, Alves-Figueiredo H, García-Rivas G. Nanoencapsulated Quercetin improves Cardioprotection during hypoxia-Reoxygenation injury through preservation of mitochondrial function. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019b;2019:7683051.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lozano O, Torres-Quintanilla A, Garcia-Rivas G. Nanomedicine for the cardiac myocyte: where are we? J Control Release. 2018;271:149–65.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lynch I, Salvati A, Dawson KA. Protein-nanoparticle interactions: what does the cell see? Nat Nanotechnol. 2009;4(9):546–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Monopoli MP, Walczyk D, Campbell A, Elia G, Lynch I, Bombelli FB, Dawson KA. Physical-chemical aspects of protein corona: relevance to in vitro and in vivo biological impacts of nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(8):2525–34.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mu Q, Hondow NS, Krzemiński L, Brown AP, Jeuken LJC, Routledge MN. Mechanism of cellular uptake of genotoxic silica nanoparticles. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2012;9:29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Napierska D, Thomassen LC, Lison D, Martens JA, Hoet PH. The nanosilica hazard: another variable entity. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2010;7(1):39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nemmar A, Albarwani S, Beegam S, Yuvaraju P, Yasin J, Attoub S, Ali BH. Amorphous silica nanoparticles impair vascular homeostasis and induce systemic inflammation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:2779–89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Noma A. ATP-regulated K+ channels in cardiac muscle. Nature. 1983;305(5930):147–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ophir N, Bar Shai A, Korenstein R, Kramer MR, Fireman E. Functional, inflammatory and interstitial impairment due to artificial stone dust ultrafine particles exposure. Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(12):875–9.

  48. 48.

    Oropeza-Almazán Y, Vázquez-Garza E, Chapoy-Villanueva H, Torre-Amione G, García-Rivas G. Small interfering RNA targeting mitochondrial calcium Uniporter improves Cardiomyocyte cell viability in hypoxia/Reoxygenation injury by reducing calcium overload. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Panessa-Warren BJ, Warrren JB, Maye MM, Schiffer W. Nanoparticle Interactions with Living Systems: In Vivo and In Vitro Biocompatibility. In: Bellucci S, editor. Nanoparticles and Nanodevices in Biological Applications: The INFN Lectures - Vol I. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009. p. 1–45.

  50. 50.

    Pope CA 3rd, Turner MC, Burnett RT, Jerrett M, Gapstur SM, Diver WR, Krewski D, Brook RD. Relationships between fine particulate air pollution, cardiometabolic disorders, and cardiovascular mortality. Circ Res. 2015;116(1):108–15.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Raieszadeh H, Noaman V, Yadegari M. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac structural and functional indices in broiler chickens treated with silver nanoparticles. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:931432.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ramachandra CJA, Mehta A, Wong P, Ja K, Fritsche-Danielson R, Bhat RV, Hausenloy DJ, Kovalik JP, Shim W. Fatty acid metabolism driven mitochondrial bioenergetics promotes advanced developmental phenotypes in human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes. Int J Cardiol. 2018;272:288–97.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ramirez-Lee MA, Aguirre-Banuelos P, Martinez-Cuevas PP, Espinosa-Tanguma R, Chi-Ahumada E, Martinez-Castanon GA, Gonzalez C. Evaluation of cardiovascular responses to silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Nanomedicine. 2018;14(2):385–95.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Riojas-Hernandez A, Bernal-Ramirez J, Rodriguez-Mier D, Morales-Marroquin FE, Dominguez-Barragan EM, Borja-Villa C, Rivera-Alvarez I, Garcia-Rivas G, Altamirano J, Garcia N. Enhanced oxidative stress sensitizes the mitochondrial permeability transition pore to opening in heart from Zucker Fa/fa rats with type 2 diabetes. Life Sci. 2015;141:32–43.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rosdah AA, Bond ST, Sivakumaran P, Hoque A, Oakhill JS, Drew BG, Delbridge LMD, Lim SY. Mdivi-1 protects human W8B2(+) cardiac stem cells from oxidative stress and simulated ischemia-reperfusion injury. Stem Cells Dev. 2017;26(24):1771–80.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Rossi S, Savi M, Mazzola M, Pinelli S, Alinovi R, Gennaccaro L, Pagliaro A, Meraviglia V, Galetti M, Lozano-Garcia O, Rossini A, Frati C, Falco A, Quaini F, Bocchi L, Stilli D, Lucas S, Goldoni M, Macchi E, Mutti A, Miragoli M. Subchronic exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles modifies cardiac structure and performance in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2019;16(1):25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Ruiz-Esparza GU, Segura-Ibarra V, Cordero-Reyes AM, Youker KA, Serda RE, Cruz-Solbes AS, Amione-Guerra J, Yokoi K, Kirui DK, Cara FE, Paez-Mayorga J, Flores-Arredondo JH, Guerrero-Beltrán CE, Garcia-Rivas G, Ferrari M, Blanco E, Torre-Amione G. A specifically designed nanoconstruct associates, internalizes, traffics in cardiovascular cells, and accumulates in failing myocardium: a new strategy for heart failure diagnostics and therapeutics. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18(2):169–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Savi M, Rossi S, Bocchi L, Gennaccaro L, Cacciani F, Perotti A, Amidani D, Alinovi R, Goldoni M, Aliatis I, Lottici PP, Bersani D, Campanini M, Pinelli S, Petyx M, Frati C, Gervasi A, Urbanek K, Quaini F, Buschini A, Stilli D, Rivetti C, Macchi E, Mutti A, Miragoli M, Zaniboni M. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles promote arrhythmias via a direct interaction with rat cardiac tissue. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014;11:63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Silva-Platas C, Guerrero-Beltran CE, Carranca M, Castillo EC, Bernal-Ramirez J, Oropeza-Almazan Y, Gonzalez LN, Rojo R, Martinez LE, Valiente-Banuet J, Ruiz-Azuara L, Bravo-Gomez ME, Garcia N, Carvajal K, Garcia-Rivas G. Antineoplastic copper coordinated complexes (Casiopeinas) uncouple oxidative phosphorylation and induce mitochondrial permeability transition in cardiac mitochondria and cardiomyocytes. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2016;48(1):43–54.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Silva-Platas C, Villegas CA, Oropeza-Almazan Y, Carranca M, Torres-Quintanilla A, Lozano O, Valero-Elizondo J, Castillo EC, Bernal-Ramirez J, Fernandez-Sada E, Vega LF, Trevino-Saldana N, Chapoy-Villanueva H, Ruiz-Azuara L, Hernandez-Brenes C, Elizondo-Montemayor L, Guerrero-Beltran CE, Carvajal K, Bravo-Gomez ME, Garcia-Rivas G. Ex vivo Cardiotoxicity of antineoplastic Casiopeinas is mediated through energetic dysfunction and triggered mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:8949450.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Xue Y, Chen Q, Ding T, Sun J. SiO2 nanoparticle-induced impairment of mitochondrial energy metabolism in hepatocytes directly and through a Kupffer cell-mediated pathway in vitro. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:2891–903.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ye Y, Liu J, Xu J, Sun L, Chen M, Lan M. Nano-SiO2 induces apoptosis via activation of p53 and Bax mediated by oxidative stress in human hepatic cell line. Toxicol In Vitro. 2010;24(3):751–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin II, Thomson JA. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917–20.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Yu Y, Duan J, Yu Y, Li Y, Zou Y, Yang Y, Jiang L, Li Q, Sun Z. Autophagy and autophagy dysfunction contribute to apoptosis in HepG2 cells exposed to nanosilica. Toxicol Res. 2016;5(3):871–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zheng W, Ren S, Graziano JH. Manganese inhibits mitochondrial aconitase: a mechanism of manganese neurotoxicity. Brain Res. 1998;799(2):334–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge: Eduardo Vázquez-Garza for his assistance in histopathology assessment, Shengjie Lu for technical assistance in performing OCR study and Jean-Paul Kovalik for advice on performing OCR. This work was a research program from the Cardiovascular Medicine Research Group- Tecnológico de Monterrey.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the CONACYT Grants 256577, 258197, Fronteras de la Ciencia Grant (0682). J Bernal-Ramírez was supported by the Graduate Student Fellowship of CONACYT. TEM and SEM-EDS work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants 5 G12 RR-013646-12 and G12 MD-007591. DJH was supported by the British Heart Foundation (CS/14/3/31002), the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council under its Clinician Scientist-Senior Investigator scheme (NMRC/CSA-SI/0011/2017) and Collaborative Centre Grant scheme (NMRC/CGAug16C006), and the Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 (MOE2016-T2–2-021). This article is based upon work from COST Action EU-CARDIOPROTECTION CA16225 supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). Chrishan Ramachandra is supported by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council under its Open Fund-Young Individual Research Grant (OF-YIRG) – [NMRC/OFYIRG/0073/2018] and by the National Health Innovation Centre Singapore under its Innovation to Develop Grant (NHIC-I2S-1811007).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Omar Lozano and Christian Silva-Platas contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Tecnologico de Monterrey. Escuela Nacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Cátedra de Cardiología y Medicina Vascular, Monterrey, Mexico

    Omar Lozano, Christian Silva-Platas, Héctor Chapoy-Villanueva, Baruc E. Pérez, Anay Lázaro-Alfaro, Estefanía Luna-Figueroa, Judith Bernal-Ramírez, Yuriana Oropeza-Almazán, Elena C. Castillo & Gerardo García-Rivas

  2. Tecnologico de Monterrey. Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Hospital Zambrano-Helión, San Pedro Garza-García, Mexico

    Omar Lozano & Gerardo García-Rivas

  3. Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Jarmon G. Lees & Shiang Y. Lim

  4. O’Brien Institute Department, St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Jarmon G. Lees & Shiang Y. Lim

  5. National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Chrishan J. A. Ramachandra & Derek J. Hausenloy

  6. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

    Chrishan J. A. Ramachandra, Poh Ling Koh & Derek J. Hausenloy

  7. Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Monterrey, Mexico

    Flavio F. Contreras-Torres

  8. Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA

    Aldemar Gordillo-Galeano & Alfredo Benitez

  9. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Derek J. Hausenloy

  10. The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, UK

    Derek J. Hausenloy

  11. Cardiovascular Research Center, College of Medical and Health Sciences, Asia University, Taichung City, Taiwan

    Derek J. Hausenloy

Authors
  1. Omar Lozano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Silva-Platas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Héctor Chapoy-Villanueva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Baruc E. Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jarmon G. Lees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chrishan J. A. Ramachandra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Flavio F. Contreras-Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anay Lázaro-Alfaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Estefanía Luna-Figueroa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Judith Bernal-Ramírez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Aldemar Gordillo-Galeano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Alfredo Benitez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yuriana Oropeza-Almazán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Elena C. Castillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Poh Ling Koh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Derek J. Hausenloy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Shiang Y. Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Gerardo García-Rivas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

OL participated in the design of the work, data acquisition and interpretation, draft and revision of the manuscript. CSP, HCV, BEP, ALA, ELF, JBR, AGG, AG, ECG and YOA participated in data acquisition and interpretation of ex vivo heart, cardiomyocyte and mitochondria of rat heart. CJAR and PLK acquired and interpreted data of human cardiomyocyte mitochondria. DJH designed and interpreted data of human cardiomyocyte mitochondria. JGL acquired and interpreted data of hi-PSC-CM cells. SYL designed and interpreted data of hi-PSC-CM cells. FFCT performed BET measurements and the interpretation of the oxidative nature of nanoSiO2. GGR participated in the conception of the work, interpretation of data, draft and revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the submitted version and have agreed to be accountable for their contributions and the accuracy of any part of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerardo García-Rivas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agreed to this publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1.

Perfusion for 30 min with nanoSiO2 did not cause structural alterations or inflammation in the heart apex. H&E staining of: A) untreated, B) 40 μg/mL nanoSiO2 perfusion, and C) 200 μg/mL nanoSiO2 perfusion. Supplementary Figure 2. nanoSiO2 accumulates in mitochondria from ventricle myocytes. Representative TEM micrograph of mitochondria showing swelling and its assessment by TEM-EDS from: (A) untreated rat CMs, (B) nanoSiO2 exposed rat CMs. (C) Quantification of Si content from EDS spectra.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lozano, O., Silva-Platas, C., Chapoy-Villanueva, H. et al. Amorphous SiO2 nanoparticles promote cardiac dysfunction via the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore in rat heart and human cardiomyocytes. Part Fibre Toxicol 17, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-020-00346-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mitochondria
  • Silica nanoparticles
  • Oxidative stress
  • Cardiotoxicity
  • Permeability transition
  • Heart
  • Calcium overload

Particle and Fibre Toxicology

ISSN: 1743-8977

Contact us