Skip to main content

Equivalent titanium dioxide nanoparticle deposition by intratracheal instillation and whole body inhalation: the effect of dose rate on acute respiratory tract inflammation



The increased production of nanomaterials has caused a corresponding increase in concern about human exposures in consumer and occupational settings. Studies in rodents have evaluated dose–response relationships following respiratory tract (RT) delivery of nanoparticles (NPs) in order to identify potential hazards. However, these studies often use bolus methods that deliver NPs at high dose rates that do not reflect real world exposures and do not measure the actual deposited dose of NPs. We hypothesize that the delivered dose rate is a key determinant of the inflammatory response in the RT when the deposited dose is constant.


F-344 rats were exposed to the same deposited doses of titanium dioxide (TiO2) NPs by single or repeated high dose rate intratracheal instillation or low dose rate whole body aerosol inhalation. Controls were exposed to saline or filtered air. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) neutrophils, biochemical parameters and inflammatory mediator release were quantified 4, 8, and 24 hr and 7 days after exposure.


Although the initial lung burdens of TiO2 were the same between the two methods, instillation resulted in greater short term retention than inhalation. There was a statistically significant increase in BALF neutrophils at 4, 8 and 24 hr after the single high dose TiO2 instillation compared to saline controls and to TiO2 inhalation, whereas TiO2 inhalation resulted in a modest, yet significant, increase in BALF neutrophils 24 hr after exposure. The acute inflammatory response following instillation was driven primarily by monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein-2, mainly within the lung. Increases in heme oxygenase-1 in the lung were also higher following instillation than inhalation. TiO2 inhalation resulted in few time dependent changes in the inflammatory mediator release. The single low dose and repeated exposure scenarios had similar BALF cellular and mediator response trends, although the responses for single exposures were more robust.


High dose rate NP delivery elicits significantly greater inflammation compared to low dose rate delivery. Although high dose rate methods can be used for quantitative ranking of NP hazards, these data caution against their use for quantitative risk assessment.


Nanoparticles (NPs) have diverse applications that have proven to be beneficial to society. They are used in many industrial processes (e.g., electronic, optical, mechanical) for the manufacture of composite materials such as semiconductors and solar cells. They are also ingredients in sunscreens and cosmetics, additives in odor-resistant clothing, and filters for soil and water remediation. In the past decade, nanomaterials have emerged as pharmaceutical carriers and imaging agents in the biomedical field [1, 2]. In fact, there are over 1,300 nanomaterial-containing products on the market today [3]. The increased production, consumer use and disposal of NP-containing products have led to a corresponding increase in the potential for accidental or incidental human exposures via the inhalation, dermal and ingestion routes as well as concerns about environmental impacts. Indeed, nanotoxicological research is focused on identifying and characterizing the hazards associated with NPs with an overall goal of generating meaningful data for regulatory purposes.

Metal oxide NPs are of specific interest since some, such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), are amongst the most widely used NPs, produced in large volumes, and have been commercially available in several shapes and sizes for decades. The present study utilizes Evonik TiO2, which has been used extensively in the toxicological literature and has been previously well characterized [4, 5]. For example, in vivo studies have shown that subchronic and chronic inhalation exposures to high concentrations of nanosized TiO2 leads to lung inflammation, increased epithelial cell proliferation, and even lung tumors in rats [69]. These studies also provided evidence that nanosized TiO2 was more potent than larger TiO2 particles when the deposited mass doses were similar.

Many current experimental approaches for assessing hazards from exposure to airborne nanoparticles use high dose rate delivery (bolus exposure) combined with high doses of particles. This does not reflect real-world exposure conditions and can lead to overestimation of hazard [10, 11]. Intratracheal instillation is one such bolus delivery technique, whereby NPs are suspended in liquid and rapidly delivered to the tracheobronchial and alveolar regions of the respiratory tract (RT) of anesthetized animals, and which results in uneven distribution of the material [10, 12]. Inhalation exposure, on the other hand, is the gold standard for RT delivery of airborne NPs for toxicity assessments, but is technically challenging and requires large amounts of material. The greatest difference between these bolus and aerosol delivery methods is the deposited dose rate of the NPs to the RT.

We hypothesize that the deposited dose rate is a key determinant of the acute inflammatory response in the RT. In the present study, dose rate was varied while keeping the deposited dose constant. Different exposure methods were used to vary dose rate: intratracheal instillation was the high dose rate delivery, which occurred within a fraction of a second (~0.5 sec), and whole body inhalation was the low dose rate delivery, which occurred over 4 hr. We also varied the dose rate by employing repeated exposure scenarios, which fractioned the same deposited dose over 4 days. Cellular and biochemical markers of acute lung inflammation and the levels of mediators that influence the progression and resolution of the inflammatory response were assessed. We demonstrate a higher inflammatory response following intratracheal instillation compared to whole body inhalation for single and repeated exposures when deposited doses were held constant. Although we did not evaluate the predictive power of intratracheal instillation for NP risk assessment, our study reinforces the need to carefully consider the use of bolus, high dose rate delivery methods for risk characterization.

Results and discussion

The unique aspect of our study design was that the same deposited doses were achieved via intratracheal instillation and whole body inhalation, which allowed us to directly compare the inflammatory responses on the basis of deposited dose rate. This is important not only because the dose itself can determine the mechanism of response for soluble compounds [13], but we also suggest the dose rate and, therefore, underlying mechanisms may be different between the two exposure methods for NPs.

Characterization of TiO2 size distributions in air and saline

Aerodynamic properties of TiO2 NPs

The size distributions of the material were assessed in air and saline for inhalation and instillation exposures, respectively (Table 1). The aerosol mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 800 nm (geometric standard deviation, GSD 1.4) and count median diameter (CMD) of 900 nm (1.8 GSD) were very similar and together indicate that TiO2 NPs agglomerated in air. This is consistent with reports that aerosolized TiO2 tends to agglomerate to ~0.7-1.5 μm in air whether the material has a primary size in the micrometer range [7, 1416] or in the nanometer range [6, 8, 9]. The aerosol diameters were the same at concentrations of 33 ± 4 mg/m3 or 13 ± 1 mg/m3 and over the course of the exposures, indicating that the animals were exposed to similarly sized agglomerates.

Table 1 The size distribution characteristics of TiO 2 in air and saline

Hydrodynamic properties of TiO 2 NPs

For instillation exposures, we assessed the hydrodynamic diameter of TiO2 in saline within 15 min after it was indirectly sonicated (cup horn) for 5 sec; all suspensions were additionally vortexed for 30 sec immediately prior to measurement. The suspension had an intensity-based average hydrodynamic diameter (z-average) of 1350 nm, with a single, broad peak with values ranging from 800–1700 nm when assessed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Table 1). Although DLS is a commonly used technique, it has disadvantages such as bias toward smaller particles and it requires that suspensions be substantially diluted [17]. Indeed, the TiO2 NP suspensions had to be diluted 1:10 in order to obtain size distribution data, as the measurement of the undiluted instillate was not possible. For these reasons, we also assessed the hydrodynamic diameter using laser diffraction spectroscopy (LDS) to determined the volume-based size distribution of diluted suspensions (1:10) and the mean was greater than 6 μm with values ranging from 0.9–11 μm (Table 1), although 10% of the sample was a separate, broad peak at ~9 μm (data not shown). Importantly, by either DLS or LDS, similar hydrodynamic diameters were observed for up to 1 hr post sonication (data not shown), indicating that the agglomeration state of the material was consistent for each animal that was instilled. We also assessed the hydrodynamic diameter for the low dose studies and the repeated exposure studies and found them to be consistent with size distributions as reported in Table 1 (data not shown). The DLS and LDS measurements cannot be directly compared because LDS measures across a wider range of particle sizes (10 nm to thousands of nm) and does not neglect particle settling or the presence of large agglomerates [18]. Likewise, it is not possible to directly compare hydrodynamic and aerodynamic particle size distributions because of inherent differences in analytical tools and in the concentrations of airborne and saline suspended NPs.

These data regarding airborne particles or liquid suspension of particles do not address the size distribution of the particles in the lung upon deposition and interactions with lung lining fluid. We presume that the size distribution of the material within the lung may differ based on delivery method from previous work [10, 12, 19]. These studies showed that intratracheal instillation results in more proximal and uneven distribution in the lung, whereas whole body inhalation results in more even distribution within the lung, including deposition to more distal regions and some carinal hotspots [20]. In fact, the inflammatory cell influx following deposition of similar lung burdens of fine and ultrafine TiO2 were higher following intratracheal instillation compared to intratracheal inhalation exposure in a study by Osier and Oberdörster [21], although inflammatory mediator release was not assessed. These differences were attributed to both differences in dose rate and unevenness of distribution. Furthermore, Henderson et al. [22] reported greater inflammatory effects of similar lung burdens of α-quartz 1 week following repeated inhalation compared to single instillation, where the inhalation animals were subjected to whole lung lavage and the instilled animals only had right lobes lavaged. Therefore, potential response differences due to uneven distribution of the material were not taken into account. Since unevenness of distribution may have played a role in response outcomes in our study, we employed whole-lung lavage. However, it is still unclear if unevenness of deposition alone is linked to mechanistic differences in response; further investigation would be beyond the scope of this manuscript.


Initial lung burden of TiO 2 NPs

The first aim of these studies was to achieve the same initial lung burden (ILB) into the lower RT for both intratracheal instillation and whole body inhalation exposures. Several studies have compared inhalation to intratracheal instillation [2226] or with other bolus delivery methods, such as pharyngeal aspiration [27, 28]. However, these studies reported estimated deposited doses without confirming them. Because model estimates can deviate significantly from actual values, we measured and used for comparison the actual deposited doses in unlavaged lungs immediately following exposure (Table 2). Whole body inhalation ILBs were not found to be statistically significantly different from intratracheal instillation ILBs; high dose single and repeated exposures also had similar deposited doses of TiO2. We assume that the TiO2 we quantified in the lung was in the particulate form based on results from a 7 day dissolution experiment, where levels of soluble Ti were below the instrument level of detection (data not shown). The poor solubility of TiO2 has been well recognized for decades, although recent findings by Al-Jubory and Handy [29] suggested that nanosized TiO2 NPs release up to 6.9 μg Ti/hr in simulated piscine intestinal fluid.

Table 2 Initial lung burdens of TiO 2

Our dosimetry findings reinforce the need to be explicit about expressing dose to the lung. For example, Mizuguchi et al. [30] described the “deposited dose” of NiO in their instillation/inhalation comparison study and Yamamoto et al. [31] quantified the dose of potassium hexatitanate that was instilled or inhaled; however, in both of these studies, measurements were performed 3 days after exposure. Such measurements characterize short term alveolar retention of the material, not ILB.

Short term retention of TiO 2 NPs

Short term retention was evaluated over a 7 day period following the single, high dose exposures in lungs that were not lavaged (Figure 1A). Although the instillation and inhalation ILBs were similar, the short term retention patterns were different, with statistically significant decreases over time following inhalation, but little change for instilled animals. Within the first 24 hr following inhalation exposure, clearance is likely due to the mucociliary transport of the deposited TiO2 NPs from the tracheobronchial region and the posterior portions of the nasal passages [32]. At 7 days, clearance is likely from the alveolar region. Some studies have suggested that deagglomerated, nanosized TiO2 can reach the interstitium and, potentially, the vasculature during the clearance process [7, 3338]. We did not detect TiO2 in the blood at 24 hr or 7 days post exposure (data not shown) and translocation to secondary organs was not evaluated in this study.

Figure 1
figure 1

Dosimetry and short term retention of TiO 2 for single high dose TiO 2 exposure. The mass of TiO2 deposited in the lung following whole body inhalation (blue squares) and intratracheal instillation (green circles) was determined immediately, 24 hr and 7 days post exposure (A) and the compartmentalization of TiO2 in BALF supernatant, BALF cell pellet and the remaining lung tissue after lavage (lavaged lung) were determined 24 hr post exposure (B). Values are group means (n = 3–5) ± standard error (SE). The inhalation and instillation ILBs were not found to be significantly different; *, significantly different compared to the respective ILB (p < 0.05).

Even though the clearance of particles from the alveolar region would begin immediately after exposure, it would take several months for the particles to fully clear from the RT [32] (T1/2 ~70 days). We assume that the short term retention profiles for the two exposure methods are different because the dissimilar deposition patterns, higher local dose per unit time, and the ensuing inflammation following instillation of TiO2 (Figure 2C) may have perturbed the clearance. Furthermore, previous findings demonstrated that over several months, the long term clearance patterns (> 7 days) are similar for the two exposure methods, both at low and high lung TiO2 burdens [39].

Figure 2
figure 2

Time course of changes in BALF cellular and biochemical parameters following single high dose exposure to TiO 2 NPs. The numbers of cells (A), macrophages (B), and neutrophils (C), and LDH (D) and β-glucuronidase activities (E) were assessed 4, 8, 24 hr and 7 days post inhalation (blue squares) or instillation (green circles) exposure. Values are group means ± SE (n = 5) and are represented as a percentage of respective controls. *, significantly different from corresponding controls; Φ, significantly different between exposure methods (p < 0.05).

Compartmentalization of TiO 2 NPs in BALF supernatant, BALF cell pellet and lavaged lung tissue

We assessed the compartmentalization of deposited TiO2 in the RT, namely in BALF supernatant, pellet and lavaged lung 24 hr post exposure (Figure 1B). The compartmentalization patterns of the instilled and inhaled animals are identical, with the majority of the material being associated with lavaged cells or lung parenchyma (inside or firmly attached to cells). Ferin et al. [40] also reported similar findings, where ~69% of instilled ultrafine TiO2 was recovered in the BALF pellet and ~30% in the remaining lung tissue. Geiser et al. [37] documented similar findings at 1 hr and 24 hr post inhalation of ultrafine TiO2 in rats: on average, ~79% of the particles were on the luminal side of the airway and alveolar surfaces, ~5% were inside epithelial or endothelial cells, ~5% in connective tissues and ~11% in capillary lumens. Kapp et al. [36] also reported TiO2 internalization in type I pneumocytes.

Within the BALF pellet, we expect that the material is associated with macrophages, specifically, given that with 5 lavages the majority of the extracted cells (~60%) are macrophages (Figure 2B) [34]. This would therefore leave ~40% of the macrophages in the lung, meaning that they are still a predominant cell type in the alveolar sacs, likely interacting with the TiO2. Other studies have indicated that physical interactions between nanomaterials and cells are necessary in order to elicit or enhance an inflammatory response or mediator release [4143], and numerous in vitro studies have demonstrated that uptake and mechanisms may be cell type dependent. Our data show that the TiO2 NPs were primarily cell associated (inside or firmly attached to cells) and elicited a significant, acute inflammatory response in the RT in vivo.

Lung inflammatory responses following single exposure to high and low doses of TiO2 NPs

Impact of dispersant on TiO 2 NP-induced neutrophil influx

Many in vitro and in vivo studies use coatings, such as surfactants, in order to mimic the lung lining fluid in an in vivo scenario [44] and/or to obtain monodisperse, stabilized suspensions [45]. Here, we did not use coatings because: 1) real world RT exposures do not involve monodispersed NPs [46]; 2) upon deposition into the lung, particles will interact with lung lining fluid and become coated with proteins and other biomolecules; 3) regardless of the suspension coating or dispersion at the time of exposure, particles may agglomerate within the lung upon deposition [47]; 4) we wanted to keep the material as pristine as possible for better comparison to the uncoated, pristine material used for inhalation; and, 5) in a pilot study, we determined that pretreatments with coating or sonication can modify the inflammatory response (Additional file 1: Figure S1). We found that pretreatment with dispersion medium (DM; 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine + albumin in saline [48]) resulted in significantly lower neutrophil influx than with saline alone (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). These findings are consistent with a study by Morimoto et al. [49] where fullerenes prepared with a 0.1 mg/mL coating of Tween-80 were not able to induce inflammatory effects when delivered by either whole body inhalation or intratracheal instillation. In addition, we observed that increased sonication time led to a significant decrease in neutrophil influx (Additional file 1: Figure S1B). In order to detect quantifiable differences between instilled and inhaled animals for our study, we kept the material as pristine as possible by suspending the material in saline and using only a 5 sec sonication time. Nonetheless, our findings regarding the impact of dispersant and sonication time on acute inflammation provide additional caveats when performing and interpreting results from studies that employ bolus delivery of NPs.

Inflammatory cell influx and BALF biochemical parameters following single high dose TiO 2 NP exposure at high and low deposited dose rates

We performed single high dose exposures by whole body inhalation or intratracheal instillation and collected BALF to assess inflammatory response induction and resolution over a 7 day period (Figure 2 and Table 3). The response endpoints are plotted in Figure 2 as a percentage of corresponding control in order to clearly depict the differences in response over time between the two exposure methods. All raw data appear in Table 3. After an initial decrease, BALF cell numbers increased significantly 24 hr after intratracheal instillation with TiO2; this effect was also significantly higher than the corresponding inhalation exposure group (Figure 2A and Table 3). The cell number changes were resolved within 7 days post exposure, despite the fact that TiO2 was still present in the lung. There were no time dependent changes in cell number following TiO2 inhalation.

Table 3 BALF cellular and biochemical parameters following single exposures to TiO 2 NPs at different dose rates

Overall, there were no statistically significant elevations in macrophages that would explain the observed changes in total cell numbers (Figure 2B and Table 3). There was a transient decrease following instillation exposure that could have been due to adhesive changes. Not surprisingly, there were also no changes in the number (or percentage) of lymphocytes in BALF (Table 3). The change in total cell number, thus, was primarily due to neutrophil influx (Figure 2C and Table 3). We observed significant increases from saline controls at 4, 8 and 24 hr post TiO2 instillation and a small transient increase in neutrophil number 24 hr after inhalation exposure. The magnitude of the neutrophil response following instillation is more than 4 times higher compared to inhalation exposure when the response is at its peak. By 7 days post exposure, the inflammatory cell changes had completely resolved regardless of exposure method. Our findings of peak inflammation occurring 24 hr after exposure are consistent with historical data from our laboratory and other published findings [34, 5053].

We also evaluated LDH release and β-glucuronidase activities (Figure 2D & E) in order to determine if deposited dose rate influences the cell membrane integrity or lysosomal membrane integrity, respectively. We observed that these response patterns followed similar trends as the cellular data, as expected, except that the instillation response did not fully resolve within 7 days. The apparently overlapping symbols in Figure 2E are a result of depicting the data as percent of control, meaning the saline and air controls have slightly different baseline values. Despite the small increases in LDH and β-glucuronidase activities, there was no change in lavage cell viability (Table 3) following exposure to TiO2 by either exposure method. Furthermore, BALF protein levels, indicative of epithelial barrier permeability changes (Table 3), were only transiently increased 8 hr after instillation exposure. These findings confirm previous reports that TiO2 is not directly cytotoxic, especially with a lung deposited dose in the microgram range [15, 5457].

Inflammatory cell influx and BALF biochemical parameters following single low dose TiO 2 NP exposure at high and low deposited dose rates

By incorporating a lower deposited dose into the study design, we were able to better characterize the impact of dose rate on responses to TiO2 NPs. We chose to evaluate responses only 24 hr after exposure, as this is when the most robust inflammatory responses were found at the higher deposited dose. We observed dose dependent increases in total cell number and neutrophil influx and only transient increases in macrophages following instillation (Figure 3 and Table 3). After inhalation, there was a significant increase in cell number at the low dose, due to small increases in macrophages and neutrophils. Although inhalation exposure did result in dose dependent increases in neutrophils, these were significantly lower in magnitude as compared to instillation at the lower deposited dose (Figure 3C and Table 3). LDH and β-glucuronidase increased in a dose dependent manner following instillation, with only transient increases at the lower dose following inhalation (Figures 3D and E, Table 3). Overall, however, these data show more robust responses by instillation than inhalation at both doses, confirming that dose rate plays a role in the inflammatory response at lower deposited doses as well as higher doses.

Figure 3
figure 3

Dose response relationships for BALF cellular and biochemical parameters 24 hr post exposure to TiO 2 NPs. The numbers of cells (A), macrophages (B), and neutrophils (C), and LDH (D) and β-glucuronidase activities (E) 24 hr post inhalation (blue squares) or instillation (green circles) exposure to increasing deposited doses of TiO2 NPs. Values are group means ± SE (n = 5) and are represented as a percentage of respective controls. *, significantly different from corresponding controls; Φ, significantly different between exposure methods (p < 0.05).

Inflammatory mediator release and oxidative stress levels following single TiO 2 NP exposures at high and low deposited dose rates

We measured several inflammatory mediators by ELISA in order to identify the drivers of the neutrophil responses following instillation and inhalation exposures to TiO2 and to determine if the mechanisms of response are different based on dose rate. Several studies have demonstrated links between NP exposure, oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory mediator release [51, 58, 59]. We selected mediators that are well-documented in the nanotoxicology literature as playing a role in RT inflammation, namely: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) (Figure 4 and Table 4). For example, MCP-1 has been shown to induce neutrophil chemotaxis to the lungs in response to inflammatory stimuli [60]. Similarly, MIP-2, the rat homologue of human IL-8, has been implicated in the aforementioned studies as a key mediator in the inflammatory response and is released by several cell types, including type II alveolar epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages. Another study suggested that TNF-α was involved with the stimulation of MIP-2 mRNA transcription for enhanced neutrophil chemotaxis [61]. Regarding TiO2 NP exposure and the induction of the inflammatory response, specifically, 1–10 nm (0–800 μg/mL) nanosized TiO2 was found to induce the production of IL-8 by freshly isolated human PMNs [62]. In addition, IL-10 levels were increased along with the total number of neutrophils in the lungs of rats for 1–2 days after instillation exposure to 1, 5 and 7.5 mg/kg TiO2, indicating increases in inflammation, which resolved within 16 days of exposure [63].

Figure 4
figure 4

Inflammatory mediator release in lung homogenates and BALF supernatants following single high dose exposure to TiO 2 NPs. Changes in MCP-1 (A , homogenates; E , BALF supernatants), MIP-2 (B , homogenates; F , BALF supernatants), TNF-α (C , homogenates) and IL-10, (D , homogenates) following inhalation (blue squares) or instillation (green circles) are graphed as percentage of controls. Values are group means ± SE (n = 5). ND, levels were below the limit of detection by ELISA (TNF-α and IL-10 ~15 pg/mL). *, significantly different from corresponding controls; Φ, significantly different between exposure methods (p < 0.05).

Table 4 Inflammatory mediator and oxidative stress release in BALF and lung homogenates following TiO 2 NP exposure at different dose rates

In the present studies, intratracheal instillation resulted in significant increases in MCP-1 in both homogenized lung tissue and BALF (Figure 4A and E, Table 4). There was, however, no significant change in MCP-1 in the animals exposed to TiO2 NPs by inhalation, suggesting that it did not play a significant role in the small but statistically significant neutrophil influx that was observed (Figures 2 and 3; Table 3). MCP-1 was the only inflammatory mediator that we found to have higher concentrations in the BALF than the lung homogenates. This is likely due to MCP-1 being released by the neutrophils themselves following recruitment into the lung, thus propagating the inflammatory response [64]. Also, MCP-1 was the only significantly increased inflammatory mediator following low dose single exposure to TiO2 NPs (Table 4). MIP-2 showed statistically significant increases from controls in lung homogenates following high dose instillation, and this response was also significantly higher than the MIP-2 released following inhalation in the early phase of the inflammatory response (Figure 4B and Table 4). In BALF, the MIP-2 response was more variable (Figure 4F and Table 4) and, while the general trends over time were different between the exposure methods, there were no statistically significant changes. TNF-α had similar trends to the MIP-2 release in the homogenates, but the overall response was lower (Figure 4C and Table 4). TNF-α was not detectable in BALF. We also evaluated the release of an anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10, in order to characterize the resolution of the response (Figure 4D and Table 4), and observed only a main effect of exposure method. Based on our findings regarding patterns of release of MCP-1, MIP-2, TNF-α and IL-10, we conclude that these mediators played a role in driving the inflammatory response to TiO2 NPs that are delivered via instillation, but not inhalation. Certainly, there are other mediators that can be investigated to further characterize the differences in response by both exposure methods. Thus, we have built upon the findings of Slikker et al. [13] – that the dose determines the mechanism – by suggesting that the mechanisms of the inflammatory response to TiO2 are inherently different when it is deposited at different dose rates.

We also evaluated changes in the early oxidative stress marker, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1; Figure 5 and Table 4), which has been shown to increase in target cells that are exposed to NPs in vitro[65]. Previous studies have shown that type II cells and alveolar macrophages produce HO-1 in response to TNF-α release [66, 67]. Here, we saw significant increases in lung homogenate HO-1 following instillation of TiO2 as compared to corresponding controls and with respect to animals that were exposed by inhalation at 4, 8 and 24 hr post exposure (Figure 5A and Table 4). Interestingly, the HO-1 levels in BALF cell pellets only modestly increased over time and the trend was similar for either method, indicating that its production by lung inflammatory cells was not affected by the deposited dose rate like it was in the lung tissue (Figure 5B and Table 4).

Figure 5
figure 5

HO-1 levels in lung homogenates and BALF cell pellets following single high dose exposure to TiO 2 NPs. HO-1 levels in lung homogenates (A) and BALF cell pellets (B) following inhalation (blue squares) or instillation (green circles) exposure. Values are group means ± SE (n = 5) and represented as percentage of controls. *, significantly different from corresponding controls; Φ, significantly different between exposure methods (p < 0.05).

Lung inflammatory responses following repeated exposures to a high dose of TiO2 NPs

In order to further characterize the effects of dose rate, we fractioned the deposited dose over 4 consecutive days of exposures either by intratracheal instillation or whole body inhalation. This exposure scenario effectively changed the rate at which the total mass of TiO2 was deposited into the lung to much lower rates than with single exposures (0.21 μg/min, repeated inhalation; 0.71 μg/min, single inhalation; 5400 μg/min, repeated instillation; 200,000 μg/min single instillation). The total deposited amounts are shown in Table 2 and, again, were not statistically significantly different between exposure methods. The total number of cells, macrophages and neutrophils were all significantly increased from control values following instillation and were also significantly greater than responses observed following TiO2 inhalation (Figure 6 and Table 5). LDH release was significantly increased by repeated inhalation and instillation exposures (Figure 6D); no significant changes were detected for β-glucuronidase activity (Figure 6E). Similar to the single exposure scenario, there were also no statistically significantly different changes observed in cell viability following repeated exposure (Table 5). Statistically significant differences from control or between exposure methods were not observed for BALF protein, only a statistically significant main effect of TiO2 exposure (Table 5). Overall, the effects of deposited dose rate for the repeated exposure model were similar to what was observed following single exposures, except that repeated exposure apparently dampened the inflammatory response. This may be due to animals undergoing adaptation as has been observed with other inflammatory stimuli [68, 69]. Also, the number and percentages of lymphocytes were significantly increased following repeated instillation exposure, which is also an indicator of adaptation [70]. Indeed, the repeated exposure model confirms the importance of dose rate when designing experiments to characterize risks associated with NPs in humans.

Figure 6
figure 6

BALF cellular and biochemical parameters following repeated high dose exposure to TiO 2 NPs. The numbers of cells (A), macrophages (B), and neutrophils (C), and LDH (D) and β-glucuronidase activities (E) were assessed 24 hr post inhalation (blue squares) or instillation (green circles) exposure. Values are group means ± SE (n = 5). *, significantly different from corresponding controls; Φ, significantly different between exposure methods (p < 0.05).

Table 5 BALF cellular and biochemical parameters following repeated exposures to TiO 2 NPs at different dose rates

Summary of the role of deposited TiO2 dose rate

The role of dose rate based on neutrophil influx following both repeated and single high dose exposures is represented in Figure 7, with response plotted as a function of the deposited dose rate. Clearly, as deposited dose rate increases, there is a corresponding increase in the neutrophil response. TiO2 instillation not only resulted in significantly more robust neutrophil influx, but also increases in LDH and β-glucuronidase activities, and MCP-1, MIP-2 and TNF-α inflammatory mediator release in lung homogenates when compared to controls and to TiO2 inhalation. MCP-1 in BALF supernatants and HO-1 levels in lung homogenates were also significantly increased from controls and compared to inhalation. Although there are several other inflammatory mediators and oxidative stress endpoints that could be investigated, the present results demonstrate that the high deposited dose rate exposures elicited higher inflammation due to signaling from the lung parenchyma as well as resident and infiltrating inflammatory cells. Whole body inhalation exposure to TiO2 NPs resulted in a low level, but statistically significant neutrophil response that was evident at 24 hr post exposure when compared to air exposed animals, with few statistically significant differences in the other response endpoints. These findings suggest that the inflammatory response following low dose rate inhalation exposure was initiated by resident inflammatory cells in the lung. Regardless of the exposure method, the inflammatory response had largely subsided by 7 days post exposure, despite the fact that TiO2 NPs still remained in the lungs.

Figure 7
figure 7

Percentage of neutrophils 24 hr after single and repeated exposure to high dose TiO 2 at different dose rates. The percentage of neutrophils in BALF at 24 hr post inhalation (blue squares) or instillation (green circles) exposure plotted according to deposited dose rate (~0.21, repeated inhalation; ~0.71, high dose single inhalation; ~5,400, repeated instillation; and ~240,000 μg/min, high dose single instillation). Symbols are group means ± SE (n = 5).

Our findings regarding the role of dose rate in TiO2 NP induced inflammatory response outcomes may only be relevant for other poorly soluble NPs. Indeed, when the same deposited dose of oil combustion particles, which are more reactive than TiO2 and a mixture of metal oxides, were delivered by intratracheal instillation or nose-only inhalation, the neutrophil, BALF protein, lung histopathology and airway responsiveness endpoints were similar between the two methods [71]. Therefore, further investigations to elucidate the mechanisms of response following different dose rate deliveries are needed for more reactive metal and metal oxide NPs. Post exposure (60–90 days) evaluation of the lung tissue histopathology would also provide further characterization of the resolution of the acute inflammatory response.


The deposited dose rate determines the mechanism and magnitude of the acute inflammatory response in the RT when the ILBs are the same. Our data suggest that results from intratracheal instillation exposure studies overestimate acute TiO2 NP toxicity and that careful consideration should be given to dose rate in the context of risk characterization. However, intratracheal instillation could still be appropriate for hazard ranking (i.e., comparing one nanomaterial to another). We presume that our conclusion that increased dose rate results in increased response outcomes is not specific to TiO2 NPs and that this phenomenon would most likely extend to other poorly soluble particles with low cytotoxicity, regardless of their size.



Specific pathogen-free male Fischer 344 rats (Harlan; Frederick, MD; 175–200 g body weight) were housed in filter-top plastic cages and given free access to food (5001; Purina Mills, LLC, St. Louis, MO) and water in a humidity and temperature controlled room with a 12 hr light–dark cycle. Prior to use in experimental protocols, all animals were acclimated for at least 1 week in an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International-accredited facility. Animals were treated humanely and with regard to the alleviation of suffering in accordance with a protocol that was approved by the University of Rochester’s Committee on Animal Resources. Animals were randomly distributed among the treatment groups, with 3–5 rats per group for dosimetry and separate groups of 5 rats for assessing acute inflammatory parameters.

Achieving similar deposited doses of TiO2

A high deposited dose of ~200 μg TiO2 was selected so that we could compare our findings with existing data sets generated in our own laboratory and other literature reports [34, 52, 72, 73]. The lower dose of ~45 μg was chosen after performing preliminary experiments that interrogated the dose response curve for neutrophil influx 24 hr after intratracheal instillation, in which we began observing significant inflammatory effects compared to saline controls. While it is straightforward to achieve the target doses for instillation exposures, lower RT deposition fractions derived from the Multiple Particle Path Dosimetry (MPPD) model [74] were used to calculate aerosol concentrations that would produce the desired doses upon inhalation exposure. In addition, the deposited doses (ILBs) following inhalation and intratracheal instillation exposures were verified through quantification of Ti content in lung tissue (see below).

Whole body inhalation exposures

Whole body inhalation was used as a low dose rate delivery method. Other exposure methods, such as nose-only inhalation, can minimize the deposition of NPs on the animals’ skin and fur and thus reduce oral uptake of NPs. However, a significant disadvantage to such methods is that the animals are subjected to higher levels of stress and would not be acclimated to exposure conditions following a single or even repeated exposure for only 4 days [75]. Due to the uncertain contribution of this stress to response outcomes, we decided to compare our intratracheal instillation response outcomes to those following whole body inhalation NP exposure. Furthermore, much of the historical literature to which we wished to compare our results describes effects of TiO2 NPs that were delivered via whole body inhalation exposures.

Rats were randomly placed in a 60 L compartmentalized, polycarbonate (Lexan) chamber, which was under slight negative pressure with an internal horizontal flow of 35 L/min. TiO2 powder (AEROXIDE P25 powder, Evonik, Germany; primary particle size, 25 nm; 80% anatase, 20% rutile crystal phase; BET surface area 57 m2/g, [4]) was fed by a screw mechanism into a jet mill (JET-O-MIZER™, Fluid Energy Equipment Division, Telford, PA), producing aerosol concentrations of either 33 ± 4 mg/m3 or 13 ± 1 mg/m3 (for 4 hr). The higher aerosol concentration of 33 ± 4 mg/m3 was used to achieve the higher deposited dose for the single exposure. The 13 ± 1 mg/m3 aerosol concentration was used for the single, low deposited dose and also for the repeated exposure for 4 hr over 4 consecutive days. Control animals were exposed to filtered air. The TiO2 aerosol mass concentrations were determined gravimetrically via filter (PALLFLEX® Emfab; PALL Life Sciences, Port Washington, NY) samples drawn from the chamber that were collected every 15 min. The MMAD was determined by an eight-stage Nano-MOUDI impactor (MSP Corp., Shoreview, MN) and the CMD by a model 1000XP wide range particle spectrometer (MSP Corp.). The size characteristics of the TiO2 aerosols were similar for the single and repeated exposure concentrations (Table 1).

Intratracheal instillation exposures

TiO2 NPs were cup horn sonicated (Sonics VCX 750 Vibra Cell, Sonics and Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT) for 5 sec at 29% amplitude in 0.9% sterile saline and vortexed for ~30 sec immediately prior to intratracheal instillation. For the experiments in Additional file 1: Figure S1, the NPs were sonicated for 5 sec, 5 min or 30 min in either dispersion medium or saline. Rats were anesthetized with 4.5% isoflurane until their breathing was slow and shallow, after which the rats were placed in a supine position with the head elevated. A modified pediatric otoscope was used to visualize the vocal cords. A 20 gauge, 1.5 inch, Teflon® catheter sheath was inserted through the vocal cords until the tip was ~3-5 mm above the bronchial carina. In synchrony with the inspiratory phase of the breathing cycle, 250 μL of the TiO2 suspension was instilled into the lung. Controls were exposed to saline that was sonicated as described above. Mock intratracheal instillations directly into platinum crucibles showed that no significant losses of TiO2 occurred in the instillation needle or syringe when compared to the deposited doses in the lungs.

The hydrodynamic size of a 1:10 dilution of the 800 μg/mL suspension of TiO2 for intratracheal instillation was determined by DLS (Nano ZS Zetasizer, Malvern Instruments, Westborough, MA) and LDS (Partica LA-950 V2; Horiba Instruments, Inc., CA) as previously described [18]. The measurements by DLS and LDS were taken after the material was sonicated for ~5 sec and then vortexed for ~30 sec, every 15 minutes for 1 hr, mimicking the preparation used prior to instilling the material and accounting for the time it takes to instill all of the rats in one group (~1 hr).

Dissolution of TiO2

The dissolution rate of TiO2 NPs was determined with a dynamic flow-through system as previously described [76]. Briefly, NPs (~0.8 mg) were suspended in 1 mL of dissolution buffer before being injected into the upper chamber of a dialysis cell fitted with a 3,500 molecular weight cellulose ester asymmetric membrane (Spectra/Pore®, Gardena, CA; effective pore size ~3.5 nm). The Ti-free dissolution buffers simulated extracellular lung lining fluid (pH = 7.4) and intraphagolysosomal fluid (pH = 4.5), respectively. The buffers flowed into the dialysis cells at a rate of 60 μL/min, or ~3 mL/hr; the outlet ports of the dialysis cells were connected to a fraction collector. The dialysis cells were submerged in a 37°C water bath in a dark room. A fraction collector with metal-free, pre-weighed polypropylene tubes was used to collect the dialysates over the course of 7 days. The sample weight for each tube was recorded. The solubilized amount of Ti in the fractions were all below the instrument limit of detection (~10 ng/mL) by atomic emission spectroscopy (Beckman Spectraspan V, Fullerton, CA).

Quantification of TiO2 NPs in lung tissues

TiO2 NP-exposed rats were euthanized with an overdose of 2, 2, 2-tribromoethanol (Avertin; 25 mg/100 g body weight, i.p.); the pelts were removed to eliminate possible transfer of TiO2 to the lung tissue from the animals’ fur as previously described [77]. Lung tissues were harvested immediately following exposure (ILB), 24 hr and 7 days post exposure by excising the lung above the bifurcation of the main bronchi. Tissue samples were dried at 85°C and then ashed at low temperature (50–100°C) in a solid state plasma asher (March Instruments Inc., Concord, CA), in which organic material is gently oxidized to CO2, leaving only TiO2 and inorganic ash. Samples were then fused with sodium carbonate/sodium borate (2:1; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 1500°C in platinum crucibles for 20 min or until a clear melt was formed. The melt was cooled and then dissolved in 2.5 N sulfuric acid and diluted 1:2 with ultra pure water. The concentration of Ti was quantified using atomic emission spectroscopy and the mass of TiO2 in each sample was then determined stoichiometrically. Control and naïve animals were found to have background levels of TiO2 in the lung below the instrument limit of detection for atomic emission spectroscopy (~10 ng/mL).

Cellular and biochemical parameters in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Separate groups of rats were euthanized at 4, 8, 24 hr and 7 days after instillation or after the beginning of the inhalation exposures with an overdose of Avertin followed by exsanguination. The lung/heart block was excised and excess tissue removed prior to the lungs being lavaged with sterile, 0.9% saline (5 × 5 mL), keeping the first two lavage supernatants separate from the remaining ones following centrifugation (10 min, 350 × g, 4°C). BAL cell viability (trypan blue exclusion), number, and the percentage of different cell types (Hema 3®; Fisher Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI) were determined. Total protein concentration was measured as an indicator of cytotoxicity and epithelial barrier permeability with the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay using reagents purchased from Thermo Scientific (Rockford, IL). Lactate dehydrogenase and β-glucuronidase activities, as indicators of cell membrane and lysosomal membrane integrity, respectively, were determined using reagents from Sigma.

Preparation of lung homogenates

Flash frozen, right lung tissues were homogenized on ice for 30 sec in 4.5 mL of radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer, comprised of reagents from Sigma (50 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl , 0.25% deoxycholic acid, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM PMSF) and Roche (Indianapolis, IN; 1% nonindet P-40, 10 μg/mL aprotinin and 10 μg/mL leupeptin). Samples were centrifuged for 1 hr at 19,800 × g and 4°C in 50 mL, round PPCO tubes (Nalgene, Rochester, NY). The protein content of the supernatants was measured using the BCA assay.

Measurements of inflammatory mediators

The lung homogenate and the BAL fluid supernatants were used for measuring MCP-1, MIP-2 (CXCL2/CINC-3), TNF-α, and IL-10 levels by ELISA using antibodies and protocols from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA), R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN), eBioscience (San Diego, CA) and Invitrogen (Frederick, MD), respectively. HO-1 in BALF cell pellet lysates (lysis buffer: 1.25x protease inhibitor cocktail P2714 from Sigma, 1% Triton X and 0.2 mM PMSF) and supernatants were also assessed by ELISA (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY).

Data analysis

The dosimetry results were analyzed for time related changes from ILB by one-way ANOVAs for both exposure methods. Differences between the exposure methods at the same post-exposure time points were assessed by a Student’s t-test. Response endpoints for the high dose single exposures were analyzed by two-way ANOVA to detect differences over time and between exposure methods. Separate control groups for every post-exposure time point were not included due to ethical reasons, specifically to limit the total number of animals used in the study, as it was not considered likely that within-exposure-method responses in controls would change consistently over the time course of this study. Therefore, controls were evaluated only at 24 hr post exposure (the endpoint of highest possible acute inflammation) and 4 hr post (the earliest time point assessed for the onset of the inflammatory responses). Responses in controls were only found to have significant time related differences within inhalation exposure for cell viability, BALF MCP-1 and homogenate MIP-2 and within instillation exposure for BALF protein, homogenate MIP-2, IL-10 and BALF pellet HO-1. Because there was no consistency in terms of which time point had higher values and the small differences were not likely to be biologically significant, the controls were pooled. The low dose response and repeated exposure data were analyzed by two-way ANOVAs with exposure method and dose of TiO2 as the main factors. Data were appropriately transformed if analyses of residuals suggested deviations from the assumptions of normality and equal variance. Two outliers were identified based on analyses of residuals (β-glucuronidase and BALF protein) and were removed from figures, tables and corresponding ANOVA tests. All comparisons were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.


  1. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N: Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311: 622–627. 10.1126/science.1114397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oberdörster G, Stone V, Donaldson K: Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historical perspective. Nanotoxicology 2007, 1: 2–25. 10.1080/17435390701314761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Project on emerging nanotechnologies

  4. Rushton EK, Jiang J, Leonard SS, Eberly S, Castranova V, Biswas P, Elder A, Han X, Gelein R, Finkelstein J, Oberdörster G: Concept of assessing nanoparticle hazards considering nanoparticle dosemetric and chemical/biological response metrics. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2010, 73: 445–461. 10.1080/15287390903489422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia T, Hamilton RF, Bonner JC, Crandall ED, Elder A, Fazlollahi F, Girtsman TA, Kim K, Mitra S, Ntim SA, et al.: Interlaboratory evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses to engineered nanomaterials: the NIEHS Nano GO Consortium. Environ Health Perspect 2013, 121: 683–690. 10.1289/ehp.1306561

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bermudez E, Mangum JB, Wong BA, Asgharian B, Hext PM, Warheit DB, Everitt JI: Pulmonary responses of mice, rats, and hamsters to subchronic inhalation of ultrafine titanium dioxide particles. Toxicol Sci 2004, 77: 347–357. 10.1093/toxsci/kfh019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferin J, Oberdörster G, Penney DP: Pulmonary retention of ultrafine and fine particles in rats. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1992, 6: 535–542. 10.1165/ajrcmb/6.5.535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heinrich U, Fuhst R, Rittinghausen S, Creutzenberg O, Bellman B, Koch W, Levsen K: Chronic inhalation exposure of Wistar rats and two different strains of mice to diesel engine exhaust, carbon black, and titanium dioxide. Inhal Toxicol 1995, 7: 533–556. 10.3109/08958379509015211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oberdörster G, Ferin J, Lehnert BE: Correlation between particle size, in vivo particle persistence, and lung injury. Environ Health Perspect 1994, 102: 173–179.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Driscoll K, Costa D, Hatch G, Henderson R, Oberdörster G, Salem H, Schlesinger R: Intratracheal instillation as an exposure technique for the evaluation of respiratory tract toxicty: uses and limitations. Toxicol Sci 2000, 55: 24–35. 10.1093/toxsci/55.1.24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J: Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 2005, 113: 823–839. 10.1289/ehp.7339

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brain JD, Knudson DE, Sorokin SP, Davis MA: Pulmonary distribution of particles given by intratracheal instillation or by aerosol inhalation. Environ Res 1976, 11: 13–33. 10.1016/0013-9351(76)90107-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Slikker W Jr, Andersen ME, Bogdanffy MS, Bus JS, Cohen SD, Conolly RB, David RM, Doerrer NG, Dorman DC, Gaylor DW, et al.: Dose-dependent transitions in mechanisms of toxicity: case studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2004, 201: 203–225. 10.1016/j.taap.2004.06.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bermudez E, Mangum JB, Asgharian B, Wong B, Reverdy EE, Janszen DB, Hext PM, Warheit DB, Everitt JI: Long-term pulmonary responses of three laboratory rodent species to subchronic inhalation of pigmentary titanium dioxide particles. Toxicol Sci 2002, 70: 86–97. 10.1093/toxsci/70.1.86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee KP, Henry NW III, Trochimowicz HJ, Reinhardt CF: Pulmonary response to impaired lung clearance in rats following excessive TiO 2 dust deposition. Environ Res 1986, 41: 144–167. 10.1016/S0013-9351(86)80177-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Muhle H, Bellmann B, Creutzenberg O, Dasenbrock C, Ernst H, Kilpper R, MacKenzie JC, Morrow P, Mohr U, Takenaka S, et al.: Pulmonary response to toner upon chronic inhalation exposure in rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1991, 17: 280–299. 10.1016/0272-0590(91)90219-T

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hackley VA, Clogston JD: Measuring the hydrodynamic size of nanoparticles in aqueous media using batch-mode dynamic light scattering. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 697: 35–52. 10.1007/978-1-60327-198-1_4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taurozzi JS, Hackley VA, Wiesner MR: Ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for environmental, health and safety assessment - issues and recommendations. Nanotoxicology 2011, 5: 711–729. 10.3109/17435390.2010.528846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sweeney TD, Brain JD: Pulmonary deposition: determinants and measurement techniques. Toxicol Pathol 1991, 19: 384–397.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Balashazy I, Hofmann W: Particle deposition in airway bifurcations - I. Inspiratory flow. J Aerorol Sci 1993, 24: 745–772. 10.1016/0021-8502(93)90044-A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Osier M, Oberdörster G: Intratracheal inhalation vs. Intratracheal instillation: differences in particle effects. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1997, 40: 220–227. 10.1006/faat.1997.2390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Henderson RF, Driscoll KE, Harkema JR, Lindenschmidt RC, Chang I-Y, Maples KR, Barr EB: A comparison of the inflammatory response of the lung to inhaled versus instilled particles in F-344 rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1995, 24: 183–197. 10.1006/faat.1995.1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobsen NR, Moller P, Jensen KA, Vogel U, Ladefoged O, Loft S, Wallin H: Lung inflammation and genotoxicity following pulmonary exposure to nanoparticles in ApoE-/- mice. Part Fibre Toxicol 2009, 6: 2. 10.1186/1743-8977-6-2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Morimoto Y, Hirohashi M, Ogami A, Oyabu T, Myojo T, Todoroki M, Yamamoto M, Hashiba M, Mizuguchi Y, Lee BW, et al.: Pulmonary toxicity of well-dispersed multi-wall carbon nanotubes following inhalation and intratracheal instillation. Nanotoxicology 2012, 6: 587–599. 10.3109/17435390.2011.594912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ogami A, Morimoto Y, Myojo T, Oyabu T: Biological effect of fullerene (C60) to lung by inhalation or instillation. J UOEH 2012, 34: 65–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jackson P, Hougaard KS, Boisen AM, Jacobsen NR, Jensen KA, Moller P, Brunborg G, Gutzkow KB, Andersen O, Loft S, et al.: Pulmonary exposure to carbon black by inhalation or instillation in pregnant mice: effects on liver DNA strand breaks in dams and offspring. Nanotoxicology 2012, 6: 486–500. 10.3109/17435390.2011.587902

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Mercer R, Murray AR, Johnson VJ, Potapovich AI, Tyurina YY, Gorelik O, Arepalli S, Schwegler-Berry D, et al.: Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2005, 289: L698-L708. 10.1152/ajplung.00084.2005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shvedova AA, Kisin E, Murray AR, Johnson VJ, Gorelik O, Arepalli S, Hubbs AF, Mercer RR, Keohavong P, Sussman N, et al.: Inhalation vs. Aspiration of single-walled carbon nanotubes in C57BL/6 mice: inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and mutagenesis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2008, 295: 552–565. 10.1152/ajplung.90287.2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Jubory AR, Handy RD: Uptake of titanium from TiO 2 nanoparticle exposure in the isolated perfused intestine of rainbow trout: nystatin, vanadate and novel CO 2 -sensitive components. Nanotoxicology 2013,7(8):1282–1301. 10.3109/17435390.2012.735268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mizuguchi Y, Myojo T, Oyabu T, Hashiba M, Lee BW, Yamamoto M, Todoroki M, Nishi K, Kadoya C, Ogami A, et al.: Comparison of dose–response relations between 4-week inhalation and intratracheal instillation of NiO nanoparticles using polimorphonuclear neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid as a biomarker of pulmonary inflammation. Inhal Toxicol 2013, 25: 29–36. 10.3109/08958378.2012.751470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yamamoto M, Oyabu T, Morimoto Y, Ogami A, Kadoya C, Nishi K, Todoroki M, Myojo T, Tanaka I: Biopersistence of potassium hexatitanate in inhalation and intratracheal instillation studies. Inhal Toxicol 2011, 23: 196–204. 10.3109/08958378.2011.558935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oberdörster G: Lung clearance of inhaled insoluble and soluble particles. J Aerosol Med 1988, 1: 289–330. 10.1089/jam.1988.1.289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pratten MK, Lloyd JB: Pinocytosis and phagocytosis: the effect of size of a particulate substrate on its mode of capture by rat peritoneal macrophages cultured in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta 1986, 881: 307–313. 10.1016/0304-4165(86)90020-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Oberdörster G, Ferin J, Gelein R, Soderholm SC, Finkelstein J: Role of the alveolar macrophage in lung injury: studies with ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 1992, 97: 193–197.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Churg A, Stevens B, Wright JL: Comparison of the uptake of fine and ultrafine TiO 2 in a tracheal explant system. Am J Physiol 1998, 274: 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kapp N, Kreyling W, Schulz H, Im Hof V, Gehr P, Semmler M, Geiser M: Electron energy loss spectroscopy for analysis of inhaled ultrafine particles in rat lungs. Microsc Res Tech 2004, 63: 298–305. 10.1002/jemt.20044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Geiser M, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Kapp N, Schurch S, Kreyling W, Schulz H, Semmler M, Im Hof V, Heyder J, Gehr P: Ultrafine particles cross cellular membranes by nonphagocytic mechanisms in lungs and in cultured cells. Environ Health Perspect 2005, 113: 1555–1560. 10.1289/ehp.8006

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Geiser M, Casaulta M, Kupferschmid B, Schulz H, Semmler-Behnke M, Kreyling W: The role of macrophages in the clearance of inhaled ultrafine titanium dioxide particles. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2008, 38: 371–376. 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0138OC

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Oberdörster G, Cox C, Gelein R: Intratracheal instillation versus intratracheal inhalation of tracer particles for measuring lung clearance function. Exp Lung Res 1997, 23: 17–34. 10.3109/01902149709046045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ferin J, Oberdörster G, Soderholm SC, Gelein R: Pulmonary tissue access of ultrafine particles. J Aerosol Med 1991, 4: 57–68. 10.1089/jam.1991.4.57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Murphy FA, Poland CA, Duffin R, Donaldson K: Length-dependent pleural inflammation and parietal pleural responses after deposition of carbon nanotubes in the pulmonary airspaces of mice. Nanotoxicology 2013,7(6):1157–1167. 10.3109/17435390.2012.713527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Blechinger J, Bauer AT, Torrano AA, Gorzelanny C, Brauchle C, Schneider SW: Uptake kinetics and nanotoxicity of silica nanoparticles are cell type dependent. Small 2013,9(23):3970–3980. 10.1002/smll.201301004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Choi J, Zheng Q, Katz HE, Guilarte TR: Silica-based nanoparticle uptake and cellular response by primary microglia. Environ Health Perspect 2010, 118: 589–595.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schleh C, Kreyling W, Lehr CM: Pulmonary sufactant is indispensable in order to simulate the in vivo situation. Part Fibre Toxicol 2013, 10: 1–6. 10.1186/1743-8977-10-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Cohen J, Deloid G, Pyrgiotakis G, Demokritou P: Interactions of engineered nanomaterials in physiological media and implications for in vitro dosimetry. Nanotoxicology 2012, 7: 417–431.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang Y, Mao P, Xu C-I, Chen S-W, Zhang J-H, Wang Z-P: Distribution characteristics of nano-TiO 2 aerosol in the workplace. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2011, 11: 466–472.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Creutzenberg O, Bellmann B, Korolewitz R, Koch W, Mangelsdorf I, Tillmann T, Schaudien D: Change in agglomeration status and toxicokinetic fate of various nanoparticles in vivo following lung exposure in rats. Inhal Toxicol 2012, 24: 821–830. 10.3109/08958378.2012.721097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Porter D, Sriram I, Wolfarth M, Jefferson A, Schwegler-Berry D, Andrew M, Castranova V: A biocompatible medium for nanoparticle dispersion. Nanotoxicology 2008, 2: 144–154. 10.1080/17435390802318349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Morimoto Y, Hirohashi M, Ogami A, Oyabu T, Myojo T, Nishi K, Kadoya C, Todoroki M, Yamamoto M, Murakami M, et al.: Inflammogenic effect of well-characterized fullerenes in inhalation and intratracheal instillation studies. Part Fibre Toxicol 2010, 7: 4. 10.1186/1743-8977-7-4

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gillespie PA, Kang GS, Elder A, Gelein R, Chen L, Moreire AL, Koberstein J, Tchou-Wong K-M, Gordon T, Chen LC: Pulmonary response after exposure to inhaled nickel hydroxide nanoparticles: short and long-term studies in mice. Nanotoxicology 2010, 4: 106–119. 10.3109/17435390903470101

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Goncalves DM, de Liz R, Girard D: The inflammatory process in response to nanoparticles. Sci World J 2011, 11: 2441–2442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bonner JC, Silva RM, Taylor AJ, Brown JM, Hilderbrand SC, Castranova V, Porter D, Elder A, Oberdörster G, Harkema JR, et al.: Interlaboratory evaluation of rodent pulmonary responses to engineered nanomaterials: the NIEHS Nano GO Consortium. Environ Health Perspect 2013, 121: 676–682. 10.1289/ehp.1205693

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Johnston CJ, Holm BA, Gelein R, Finkelstein JN: Postnatal lung development: Immediate-early gene responses post ozone and LPS exposure. Inhal Toxicol 2006, 18: 875–883. 10.1080/08958370600822466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ates M, Daniels J, Arslan Z, Farah IO: Effects of aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on artemia salina: assessment of nanoparticle aggregation, accumulation, and toxicity. Environ Monit Assess 2013, 185: 3339–3348. 10.1007/s10661-012-2794-7

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Höhr D, Steinfartz Y, Schins RP, Knaapen AM, Martra G, Fubini B, Borm PJ: The surface area rather than the surface coating determines the acute inflammatory response after instillation of fine and ultrafine TiO 2 in the rat. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2002, 205: 239–244. 10.1078/1438-4639-00123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Driscoll KE, Lindenschmidt RC, Maurer JK, Higgins JM, Ridder G: Pulmonary response to silica or titanium dioxide: inflammatory cells, alveolar macrophage-derived cytokines, and histopathology. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1990, 2: 381–390. 10.1165/ajrcmb/2.4.381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Driscoll KE, Maurer JK, Lindenschmidt RC, Romberger D, Rennard SI, Crosby L: Respiratory tract responses to dust: relationships between dust burden, lung injury, alveolar macrophage fibronectin release, and the development of pulmonary fibrosis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1990, 106: 88–101. 10.1016/0041-008X(90)90109-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Carter JM, Corson N, Driscoll KE, Elder A, Finkelstein JN, Harkema JN, Gelein R, Wade-Mercer P, Nguyen K, Oberdörster G: A comparative dose-related response of several key pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators in the lungs of rats, mice, and hamsters after subchronic inhalation of carbon black. J Occup Environ Med 2006, 48: 1265–1278. 10.1097/01.jom.0000230489.06025.14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Roursgaard M, Poulsen SS, Poulsen LK, Hammer M, Jensen KA, Utsunomiya S, Ewing RC, Balic-Zunic T, Nielsen GD, Larsen ST: Time-response relationship of nano and micro particle induced lung inflammation: quartz as reference compound. Human Exper Toxicol 2010, 29: 915–933. 10.1177/0960327110363329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Strieter RM, Belperio JA, Keane MP: Host innate defenses in the lung: the role of cytokines. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2003, 16: 193–198. 10.1097/00001432-200306000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ishii Y, Yang H, Sakamoto T, Nomura A, Hasegawa S, Hirata F, Bassett DJ: Rat alveolar macrophage cytokine production and regulation of neutrophil recruitment following acute ozone exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1997, 147: 214–223. 10.1006/taap.1997.8275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Vamanu CI, Cimpan MR, Hol PJ, Sornes S, Lie SA, Gjerdet NR: Induction of cell death by TiO 2 nanoparticles: studies on a human monoblastoid cell line. Toxicol In Vitro 2008, 22: 1689–1696. 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.07.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gustafsson A, Lindstedt E, Elfsmark LS, Bucht A: Lung exposure of titanium dioxide nanoparticles induces innate immune activation and long-lasting lymphocyte response in the Dark Agouti rat. J Immunotoxicol 2011, 8: 111–121. 10.3109/1547691X.2010.546382

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Blidberg K, Palmberg L, Dahlen B, Lantz AS, Larsson K: Chemokine release by neutrophils in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Innate Immun 2012, 18: 503–510. 10.1177/1753425911423270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ryter SW, Choi AM: Heme oxygenase-1: redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell culture models. Antioxid Redox Signal 2005, 7: 80–91. 10.1089/ars.2005.7.80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Fredenburgh LE, Perrella MA, Mitsialis SA: The role of heme oxygenase-1 in pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2007, 36: 158–165. 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0331TR

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Wiesel P, Patel AP, DiFonzo N, Marria PB, Sim CU, Pellacani A, Maemura K, LeBlanc BW, Marino K, Doerschuk CM, et al.: Endotoxin-induced mortality is related to increased oxidative stress and end-organ dysfunction, not refractory hypotension, in heme oxygenase-1-deficient mice. Circulation 2000, 102: 3015–3022. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.24.3015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Johnston CJ, Finkelstein JN, Mercer P, Corson N, Gelein R, Oberdörster G: Pulmonary effects induced by ultrafine PTFE particles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2000, 168: 208–215. 10.1006/taap.2000.9037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Elder ACP, Finkelstein J, Johnston C, Gelein R, Oberdörster G: Induction of adaptation to inhaled lipopolysaccharide in young and old rats and mice. Inhal Toxicol 2000, 12: 225–243. 10.1080/089583700196257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Narni-Mancinelli E, Ugolini S, Vivier E: Natural killer cells: adaptation and memory in innate immunity. Med Sci 2013, 29: 389–395.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Costa DL, Lehmann JR, Winsett D, Richards J, Ledbetter AD, Dreher KL: Comparative pulmonary toxicological assessment of oil combustion particles following inhalation or instillation exposure. Toxicol Sci 2006, 91: 237–246. 10.1093/toxsci/kfj123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Li D, Cui F, Zhao Z, Liu D, Xu Y, Li H, Yang X: The impact of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on biological nitrogen removal from wastewater and bacterial community shifts in activated sludge. Biodegradation 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Warheit DB, Webb TR, Sayes CM, Colvin VL, Reed KL: Pulmonary instillation studies with nanoscale TiO 2 rods and dots in rats: toxicity is not dependent upon particle size and surface area. Toxicol Sci 2006, 91: 227–236. 10.1093/toxsci/kfj140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Asgharian B, Anjilvel S: A multiple-path model of fiber deposition in the rat lung. Toxicol Sci 1998, 44: 80–86. 10.1093/toxsci/44.1.80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Yeh HC, Snipes MB, Eidson AF, Hobbs CH: Comparative evaluation of nose-only versus whole-body inhalation exposures for rats – aerosol characteristics and lung deposition. Inhal Toxicol 1990, 2: 205–221. 10.3109/08958379009145255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Potter RM, Mattson SM: Glass fiber dissolution in a physiological saline solution. Glasstech Ber 1991, 64: 16–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Oberdörster G, Sharp Z, Atudorei V, Elder A, Gelein R, Kreyling W, Cox C: Translocation of inhaled ultrafine particles to the brain. Inhal Toxicol 2004, 16: 437–445. 10.1080/08958370490439597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This project was supported by funding from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (RC2ES018741, R01CA134218, Center grant P30ES01247 and training grants T32ES07026 and T32HL066988). The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Andre Nel (UCLA) for providing the TiO2 nanoparticles used in this study. Drs. Julian Taurozzi and Vince Hackley (National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST) graciously performed the LDS measurements; the identification of any commercial product or trade name does not imply endorsement or recommendation by NIST. Lastly, we would like to acknowledge Dr. Sally Thurston from the University of Rochester, Department of Biostatistics, for her advice and input regarding the statistical analyses conducted in these studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Elder.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

BB conceived of the study, participated in its design, characterized the material in liquid suspension, performed exposures, sample collections, acquisition of data, statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. NC, PW-M and AK performed the exposures, sample collection, and acquisition of data. RG conceived the design for the dosimetry experiments and performed the analytical measurements of Ti content, assisted with exposures and characterization of the TiO2 aerosol. GO and AE provided advice for the study, participated in its design, and assisted with data interpretation and revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Figure S1: Suspension and Sonication Time Effects on the Inflammatory Response. The neutrophil response 24 hr post intratracheal instillation with TiO2 that was: (A) suspended in DM (red) or saline (green) and cup horn sonicated for 5 sec; (B) suspended in saline and cup horn sonicated for 5 sec (solid green), 5 min (green dots), or 30 min (green checkers). Bars are group means (n = 5) ± SE and are shown as a percentage of corresponding controls (DM or saline). In A the *indicate a significant increase from corresponding control and Φ indicates a significant difference between dispersants as determined by a two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). In B the *indicate significant increases from corresponding control and Ω indicate significant differences from the other two sonication times as determined by a two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). (DOC 228 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baisch, B.L., Corson, N.M., Wade-Mercer, P. et al. Equivalent titanium dioxide nanoparticle deposition by intratracheal instillation and whole body inhalation: the effect of dose rate on acute respiratory tract inflammation. Part Fibre Toxicol 11, 5 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: