- Open Access
Silver nanoparticles promote procoagulant activity of red blood cells: a potential risk of thrombosis in susceptible population
© The Author(s). 2019
- Received: 28 May 2018
- Accepted: 1 February 2019
- Published: 14 February 2019
Silver nanoparticles (AgNP) are widely used in medical practices owing to their distinct antibacterial, antiviral and anticancer activities. However, with increasing use of AgNP, concerns over its potential toxicity are also escalating. Here, we demonstrated the potential thrombotic effect of AgNP which was mediated by the procoagulant activity of red blood cells (RBCs).
In freshly isolated human RBCs, AgNP, but not silver microparticles (AgMP), elicited morphological changes, phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure and microvesicles (MV) generation, the key indicators of procoagulant activity in RBCs at concentration ranges (≤ 100 μg/mL) that were free of significant hemolysis. In line with this, AgNP potentiated thrombin generation and adherence of RBCs to endothelial cells, while AgMP did not. Oxidative stress, intracellular calcium increase and ATP depletion were found to underlie the procoagulant effects of AgNP, which led to altered activity of membrane aminophospholipid translocases. These in vitro findings were well reproduced in rat in vivo, where intravenously exposure to AgNP promoted venous thrombosis significantly. Of note, RBCs isolated from cancer patients, who inherently convey the risk of thrombogenesis, were more sensitive to the procoagulant effects of AgNP. In addition, AgNP significantly potentiated the procoagulant effects of a chemotherapeutic drug, paclitaxel.
Collectively, these results suggest that AgNP may have prothrombotic risks by promoting procoagulant activity of RBCs and caution shall be taken for its use in the population sensitive to thrombosis like cancer patients.
- Silver nanoparticles (AgNP)
- Red blood cells (RBCs)
Silver nanoparticles (AgNP) are widely used for therapeutic interventions and diagnosis in medical practices and have gained increasing popularity as drug carriers, nanoprobes, bio-imaging and labeling agents [1, 2]. Along with increasing application of AgNP in nanomedicine, however, concerns are also escalating over its potential toxicity against human health [3–5]. Potential adverse effects of AgNP against human health have been first illuminated at a concentration range of 25 ~ 500 μg/mL for 10 ~ 72 h duration in vitro, with respect to its cytotoxicity on human cell lines, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, oxidative stress, cell-cycle arrest, pro-apoptotic effects and genotoxicity [5–7].
AgNP readily enters the systemic circulation [8–10]. Accordingly, much attention has been paid to the potential cardiovascular toxicity of AgNP due to an easy access of AgNP to the tissues of cardiovascular system like blood cells, heart, and blood vessels [11–13]. Previously, we demonstrated that AgNP can activate platelets, which ultimately contributed to increased thrombosis . Thrombosis and embolism are serious life-threatening complications of various diseases with hypercoagulable states that include cancer , nursing home confinement, surgery, trauma , and heavy metal intoxication [16, 17]. In addition to platelets, red blood cells (RBCs), a major cellular component of blood, can participate in venous thrombosis through facilitating coagulation cascade and clot formation by providing a site for the assembly of prothrombinase and tenase complexes . Externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS), an anionic phospholipid, to the outer leaflet of lipid bilayer is key in this process, which is primed through intracellular calcium increase, ATP- and thiol-depletion . Oxidative stress has been well-established to amplify PS exposure and MV generation, further promoting the procoagulant activity of RBCs . Importantly, association of prothrombotic complications with procoagulant activity of RBCs has been established for cancer patients , suggesting that AgNP may present additional thrombotic risk on the cancer patients.
Here, we investigated whether AgNP could affect the procoagulant activity of RBCs, with respect to PS exposure, ROS generation and intracellular calcium increase. The relevance of AgNP-induced procoagulant activity of RBCs to in vivo thrombosis was examined using a rat venous thrombosis model. In an effort to address the thrombotic risk of AgNP in the population susceptible to thrombosis, we examined on the procoagulant effects of AgNP on freshly isolated RBCs from leukemia patients and the synergy with a chemotherapeutic drug (paclitaxel) with thrombotic effects of its own was assessed.
Characterization of AgNP and its cellular uptake by RBCs
A pilot study for the following study in vitro
Phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure of RBCs and microvesicles (MV) generation at non-hemolytic concentrations
While lower concentrations of AgNP (≤ 100 μg/mL) did not induce hemolysis, TEM observation indicated the cellular uptake of AgNP, suggesting that non-hemolytic effects might be induced in RBCs by AgNP at low doses. Firstly, we investigated the procoagulant activity of RBCs, which is critical to the development of venous thrombosis. Confocal microscopy and SEM observation revealed that the exposure to AgNP induced the occurrence of spiny RBCs, namely echinocytes at 100 μg/mL (4 h) while AgMP was without effects (Fig. 2b, c). A lower effective level could be observed after a longer exposure time compared to the effective level of 50 μg/mL for 4 h incubation with AgNP. As shown in Additional file 3: Figure S2, at 24 h, the effective level of AgNP was 1 μg/mL with around 30% PS exposure, which was 100 times less than that observed at 4 h. It is well known that loss of phospholipid asymmetry is attributable to morphological change in RBCs. During this process, PS can be externalized to outer membrane and membrane surface is lost as MV is generated, which are closely related to procoagulant activity of RBCs . Indeed, in flow cytometry analysis, PS exposure increased in concentration- and time- dependent manners after the exposure to AgNP (Fig. 2d, e). MV generation was also observed upon the exposure to AgNP (Fig. 2f). In contrast to AgNP, even high concentrations of AgMP did not induce any effects on RBCs including hemolysis, shape change, PS exposure or MV generation (Fig. 2).
Effects of AgNP on oxidative stress and intracellular calcium in human RBCs
It is well established that oxidative stress can cause intracellular calcium increase, which is referred as a key stimulus to induce both PS exposure and MV generation . Notably, intracellular calcium level was increased considerably by AgNP (Fig. 3d), which was abolished by the pretreatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a well-known antioxidant (Fig. 3e). Increased intracellular calcium level can activate scramblase, leading to a bidirectional exchange (scrambling) of membrane phospholipids  and outward translocation of PS residing on inner membrane leaflet . Indeed, the activity of scramblase was significantly increased as determined by C6-NBD-PC externalization (Fig. 3f). Flippase is another aminophospholipid translocase mediating the inward translocation of PS exposed on outer membrane leaflet . The significant decrease in flippase activity at 10 μg/mL indicated an effect of AgNP on the inner ward phospholipid translocation. However, this effect was not shown at higher concentrations of 50 and 100 μg/mL, which appeared to be from the interference of scramblase activity on outer ward phospholipid translocation. Compared with AgNP-exposed groups, no significant effects in ROS generation, GSH depletion, ATP depletion, intracellular calcium level and scramblase activity were observed in AgMP-exposed groups (Fig. 3).
Prothrombotic effects of AgNP on human RBCs
In vivo assessment of AgNP-induced prothrombotic effects
Effects of AgNP on procoagulant activity of RBCs isolated from cancer patients and the synergy with chemotherapeutic agents
Chemotherapeutic drugs to treat cancers also have procoagulant effects [27, 28] and have been previously reported to contribute to increased thrombosis in cancer patients . We investigated whether AgNP may have synergy effects on the procoagulant effects of paclitaxel (PTX), a well-known chemotherapeutic drug which can induce procoagulant activity of RBCs . As shown in Figure 7c and d, the combined exposure to PTX and AgNP significantly increased ROS generation and PS exposure in RBCs compared with those treated with AgNP alone or PTX alone.
Toxicity of AgNP has been investigated in many studies, including cytotoxicity of AgNP in various cells in vitro [4, 6, 30], and assessment of bio-distribution, elimination, and accumulation of AgNP in organs and potential organ toxicity associated with AgNP exposure [7, 31]. Considering the direct contact of blood cells with AgNP entering the body during circulation, potential cardiovascular toxicity of AgNP shall not be ruled out. However, few studies have addressed the mechanism underlying AgNP-induced toxicity on RBCs in relation to pathophysiological effects. Previous studies have focused on the direct toxicity of AgNP on the structural integrity of RBCs or early events such as hemolysis, oxidative stress and membrane damage [11, 32, 33] without extending them into the mechanisms leading to diseases. Here, we demonstrated that AgNP may promote thrombosis through procoagulant activity of RBCs providing an important piece of clue for the potential cardiovascular toxicity of AgNP.
In RBCs, toxicological effects of AgNP have been investigated regarding the hemolysis employing extremely high concentration ranges (up to 500 μg/mL) of AgNP [11, 32]. We could also observe a significant hemolysis at high concentrations of AgNP (from 250 μg/mL to 500 μg/mL), which matched well with previous studies of hemolysis. Actually, this range is too high and raises questions on its clinical relevance. Of note, we observed that AgNP can induce PS exposure and procoagulant activity at non-hemolytic concentrations as low as 50 μg/mL after 4 h exposure, demonstrating that AgNP can cause adverse effects on cardiovascular system at non-hemolytic ranges. This concentration range of AgNP is comparable with those (25 ~ 400 μg/mL) used in the previous literatures on AgNP toxicity against human peripheral blood cells or lung cells [6, 7]. Furthermore, we also observed that a prolonged exposure (24 hr) could significantly lower the effective level to 1 μg/mL as shown in Additional file 3: Figure S2, indicating a more potent toxicity could be expected after a longer exposure. Currently, reports on the toxicity of AgNP in vivo are often controversial and inconsistent. In an attempt to demonstrate AgNP toxicity in vivo, diverse exposure routes, such as oral exposure, inhalation, intraperitoneal and intravenous, in the settings of single or multiple exposure and with various AgNP differed in size, surface charge and surface-coating substances have been explored in many experimental animal species. While oral administration of AgNP unanimously showed no obvious toxicity in acute or subacute studies [34–36], intravenous (i.v.) exposure to AgNPs was not without toxicity. Previous studies observed spleen and liver toxicity of AgNP in mice after 10 mg/kg i.v. administration, and liver and hematological toxicity in rats after i.v. injection of 4~40 mg/kg AgNP [37, 38]. Consistently, in our study, AgNP induced thrombosis at ≥ 10 mg/kg by promoting procoagulant activation of RBCs. After i.v. injection of 10 mg/kg AgNP in rats, peak concentration of 5.2 μg/mL was observed at 8 h, which was basically maintained at around 5 μg/mL up to 96 h  of which range was similar to our studies in vitro and in vivo.
It has been still controversial that whether the toxic effect is particle-specific or mediated by silver ions dissolved from AgNP. A previous literature suggested released silver ions were the primary cause of AgNP toxicity on Sphaerium corneum , and the effect of silver ion on RBCs was reported by Sopjani et al. . However, Recordati et al. showed that silver ion and AgNP exhibit distinct patterns of tissue distribution and toxicity, and toxicity of AgNP was attributable to the nanoparticle form . Consistently, we could observe negligible release of silver ion from AgNP and more importantly, found that silver ion did not induce PS exposure shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S1, although the dissolution may differ depending on physiochemical characteristics (e.g. size, shape, surface charge, pH etc.) .
ROS and oxidative stress are involved in regulating normal physiology as well as pathophysiological processes. Excessive production of ROS has been well established to orchestrate a series of pathological events such as genotoxicity, inflammation, fibrosis, and carcinogenesis [43, 44]. ROS generation induced by AgNP has been reported to provoke cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in leukemia cells and lung cells [6, 7], indicating that ROS generation may explain the toxicity of AgNP. Indeed, ROS generation played a central role in the procoagulant and prothrombotic effects of AgNP on RBCs. Interestingly, other nanomaterials such as carbon, titanium dioxide (TiO2) and manganese oxide (MnO2) have been shown to induce oxidative stress triggering signaling cascades that eventually result in increased expression of proinflammatory, fibrotic cytokines and cell damage [21, 43, 45]. In this context, in addition to AgNP, potential effects of other nanomaterials on procoagulant activity of RBCs warrant further attention as well .
Recently, nanotechnology has been incorporated into various fields of medical practice. Nanomedicine has emerged as the mainstream in cancer management. Notably, cancer patients are at a hypercoagulable state as for such reasons as advanced stage of diseases, intravascular metastasis, and increased tumor volume [14, 25, 29]. Clinically detectable thrombotic events were found in 15~20% of all cancer patients [14, 15, 25]. Cancer, itself, is a major thrombotic risk factor increasing thrombosis by 4.1 fold and moreover, chemotherapeutic agents heighten it even further by 6.5 fold [15, 26], reflecting the risk of AgNP-use in cancer management. Of critical, exposure to AgNP in combination of chemotherapeutic agent may aggravate thrombotic risks when combined with the hypercoagulable state of cancer patients, which needs further studies in the future.
Our study demonstrated that AgNP can promote prothrombotic risks by increasing procoagulant activity of RBCs both in vitro and in vivo. The mechanism underlying the effect appears to involve oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species generation. Of note, procoagulant effects of AgNP were enhanced in RBCs of cancer patients and a significant synergy was observed with a chemotherapeutic agent, paclitaxel in promoting procoagulant activity of RBCs, suggesting that caution should be taken for its use in cancer patients.
AgNP (silver nanoparticles, < 100 nm particle size, contains 0.2% PVP as dispersant, 99.5% trace metals basis.), AgMP (silver microparticles, 5-8 micro, ≥ 99.9% metals basis), mercury orange, trolox, L-ascorbic acid, glutaldehyde solution and osmium tetroxide, the ATP bioluminescent assay kit, and purified human thrombin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Phycoerythrin-labeled monoclonal mouse anti-human CD235a and fluorescein-isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled annexin V (annexin V-FITC) were from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA). Fluo-4 acetoxymethyl ester (fluo-4 AM) and the chloromethyl derivative of 2′, 7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (CM-H2DCF-DA) were obtained from Life Technologies.1-Palmitoyl-2-[6-[(7-nitro-2-1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)amino]hexanoyl]-snglycero-3-phospho-L-serine (C6-NBD-PS) and 1-oleoyl-2-[6-[(7-nitro-2-1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)amino]hexanoyl]-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (C6-NBD-PC) were from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). Purified human prothrombin, factor Xa and factor Va were from Hematologic Technologies, Inc. (Essex Junction, VT), and S2238 was from Chromogenix (Milano, Italy). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and the endothelial cell growth media (EGM) kit were purchased from Lonza. Human recombinant tissue factor (Recombiplastin) was obtained from Instrumentation Laboratory (Lexington, MA) and thromboplastin (Simplastin Excel) was from Biomerieux (Durham, NC).
Assessment of characterization of AgNP
Both AgNP and AgMP were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Preparation of AgNP suspension was carried out according to the methods previously described . AgNP or AgMP powder were dispersed in distilled water as 100 X stock solution (1–50 mg/mL) and sonicated with a probe type sonicator with a maximum output power, 200 Watts (Branson Sonifier, Danbury, CT) for 2 min to prevent particles self-assembly (agglomeration). In addition, prior to every experiment, AgNP suspensions were vigorously vortexed for 30 sec. AgNP we used in the present study were with 0.2% PVP as dispersant (provided by Sigma Aldrich), while no PVP was in AgMP (provided by Sigma Aldrich). Through mathematical calculation, there might be 0.2 μg/mL PVP in 10 μg/mL AgNP-treated group, while 2 μg/mL PVP in 100 μg/mL AgNP-treated group. In order to estimate the effect of PVP in AgNP on PS exposure, we determined the effect of 2 μg/mL PVP alone on PS exposure of RBCs. Results are as follows: Control (1.52 ± 0.90% PS exposure); 2 μg/mL PVP (1.38 ± 1.46% PS exposure). Since PVP had minimal effects, DW (distilled water) was used as a vehicle control.
For the characterization of AgNP, AgNP suspension was dried and was observed with scanning electron microscope (SEM) (ZEISS, MERLIN Compact) to examine the size frequency. A detailed statistical analysis of AgNP was performed by randomly measuring 118 nanoparticles and the procedure was operated by manually outlining the particles from several images taken by SEM. Nanoparticles were used at a concentration of 100 μg/mL in the following determination. The hydrodynamic diameter and the zeta potential of the nanoparticles were measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS-7000) and electrophoretic light scattering (ELS Z-100), respectively. The polydispersity index (PDI) was below 0.3 in all cases. For determination of dissolved silver, ultracentrifuge (13,000 rpm for 10 min) and dialysis (24 hr) were prior to the quantification of Ag. Dialysis experiments were carried out in dialysis bags filled with 5 mL silver nanoparticle dispersion (100 μg/mL) and immersed in 495 mL water. The concentration of silver was < 0.1 μg/L determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with the limit of detection of 0.1 μg/L. The maximum possible percentage of ionic Ag in silver nanoparticle dispersion was 0.01%.
Preparation of RBCs
With the approval from the Ethics Committee of Health Service Center at Seoul National University, human blood was obtained from healthy male donors (20-30 years old) using a vacutainer with acid citrate dextrose (ACD) and a 21 gauge needle (Becton Dickinson, U.S.A.) on the day of each experiments. Platelet rich plasma and buffy coat were removed by aspiration after centrifugation at 200 g for 15 min. Packed RBCs were washed 2 times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS: 1.06 mM KH2PO4, 154 mM NaCl and 2.96 mM Na2HPO4 at pH 7.4) and once more with Ringer's solution (125 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 32 mM HEPES, 5 mM glucose, pH 7.4). Washed RBCs were resuspended in TBS buffer to a cell concentration of 5 x 107 cells/mL, and the final CaCl2 concentration was adjusted to 1 mM prior to use.
Observation of cellular uptake of AgNP by RBCs
For detection of cellular uptake of AgNP by RBCs, isolated RBCs were incubated with AgNP for 4 h, and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde solution in the refrigerator overnight. On the second day, after washing three times with 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer every 10 min, cells were post-fixated with 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 h. Before en-bloc staining with 0.5% uranyl acetate for 30 minutes, briefly washing with DW were done twice, and serially dehydrated once with 30, 50, 70, 80, 90% and three time with 100% ethanol. Next, propylene oxide was used for transition every 10 min for 2 times, and infiltration were done once with propylene oxide and spurr’s resin (1:1) for 2 h, then with only spurr’s resin in the desiccator overnight. On the third day, infiltration was completed with newly spurr’s resin for 2 h in the desiccator, then samples were kept in the 70°C oven overnight for polymerization. Finally, samples were observed under TEM (JEOL, JEM 1010).
Flow cytometric analysis of phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure and microvesicles (MV) generation
Annexin V-FITC was used as a marker for PS detection, whereas anti-glycophorin A-PE was used as an identifier of RBCs. Negative controls for annexin V binding were stained with annexin V-FITC in the presence of 2.5 mM EDTA instead of 2.5 mM CaCl2. Samples were analyzed on the flow cytometer FACS Calibur (Becton Dickinson, U.S.A.) equipped with an argon-ion laser emitting at 488 nm. The light scatter and fluorescence channels were set on a log scale. Data from 5,000 events were collected and analyzed using Cell Quest Pro software. MV were identified on the basis of forward scatter characteristics after calibration by 1 μM standard beads. The extent of hemolysis was determined spectrophotometrically at 540 nm.
Microscopic observation using confocal and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
For confocal microscopy, 500 μL RBCs suspension was added and attached for 1 h to a four-chambered coverslip (Lab-Tek; Nalge Nunc Inc., Naperville, IL). After washing the coverslip once with Ringer’s solution containing 2% BSA, RBCs were then incubated with a vehicle control (DW in Ringer’s solution), AgNP or AgMP (dissolved in Ringer’s solution). After incubation, the coverslips were washed once again with Ringer’s solution and then, RBCs were stained with Ringer’s solution containing anti–glycophorin-A–PE for 30 min. Ultimately, samples were washed once and resuspended to be observed using confocal microscopy equipped with an argon laser (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Excitation and emission filters were set at 488 nm and 550–600 nm, respectively. For SEM observation, after fixation with 2% glutaraldehyde solution for 1 h at 4°C, the RBCs were centrifuged and washed three times with PBS, followed by post-fixation with 1% osmium tetroxide for 30 min at room temperature in the hood. After washing with PBS twice, the samples were dehydrated serially with 50, 70, 80, 90, and 100% ethanol. After drying and coating with gold, the images were observed on a SEM.
Measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and intracellular glutathion (GSH) level
To detect ROS generation, RBCs were preincubated with 5 μM CM-H2DCF-DA for 30 min at 37°C. After washing with Ringer’s solution containing 1 mM CaCl2 to remove excess CM-H2DCF-DA, RBCs were incubated with AgNP or AgMP. The aliquots were diluted and the fluorescence of intracellular DCF was measured using flow cytometry. GSH level in RBCs was measured according to the method described by Jose Enrique O’Connor et al . After incubated with vehicles (DW), AgNP or AgMP, RBCs were treated with 40 μM mercury orange (dissolved in acetone) and then incubated in ice for 5 min. After that, cells were washed and resuspended with cold Ringer's solution, and then diluted with cold Ringer’s solution to be analyzed with an FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
Measurement of intracellular ATP and calcium levels
Samples were washed and resuspended in Ringer’s solution containing 1 mM CaCl2. The aliquot was mixed vigorously with TAE buffer (100 mM Tris-acetate, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.8) containing 10% trichloroacetic acid, and then cooled in ice for 20 min. The sample was centrifuged and the aliquot of resultant supernatant was mixed with cold TAE buffer. The intracellular ATP level was measured by luciferin/luciferase assay in Luminoskan (Labsystems, Franklin, Massachusetts) using an ATP assay kit. We calculated the ATP concentrations based on the ATP standard curve. To detect intracellular calcium increase, RBCs were loaded with 3 μM Fluo-4 AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) for 1h at 37°C in the dark. After excess Fluo-4 AM was removed, AgNP or AgMP were treated to RBCs. The aliquots were diluted and analyzed in flow cytometer. Data from 5,000 events were collected and analyzed using Cell Quest Pro software (Becton Dickinson).
Phospholipid translocation measurement
RBCs (5 x 107 cells/mL) were incubated with AgNP or AgMP for 30 min at 37 °C and then loaded with 0.5 μM C6-NBD-PC and C6-NBD-PS. Aliquots from the cell suspension were removed at the indicated time intervals and placed on ice for 20 min in the presence or absence of 1 % bovine serum albumin (BSA). Pellets obtained after 1 min of centrifugation at 12,000 g were lyzed in 1% Triton X-100, and the fluorescence intensities were measured (ex 485 nm, em 535 nm). The amount of internalized probe was determined by comparing the fluorescence intensity associated with the cells before and after back-extraction.
After incubation with AgNP or AgMP for 4 h, samples were incubated with 5 nM factor Xa and 10 nM factor Va in Tyrode buffer (134 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 5 mM glucose, 2.9 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 12 mM NaHCO3, 0.34 mM Na2HPO4, 0.3% BSA, and 2 mM CaCl2 at pH 7.4) for 3 min at 37 °C. Thrombin formation was initiated by addition of 2 μM prothrombin. Exactly 3 min after the addition of prothrombin, an aliquot of the suspension was transferred to a tube containing stop buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 120 mM NaCl, and 2 mM EDTA at pH 7.9). Thrombin activity was determined using the chromogenic substrate S2238 (chromogenic substrate for thrombin; Chromogenix, Milano, Italy). We calculated the rate of thrombin formation from the change in absorbance at 405 nm using a calibration curve generated with active-site–titrated thrombin.
Adherence of RBCs to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)
The HUVECs (6-8 passages) were maintained in the endothelial cell growth media kit at 37°C in a 95% air/5 % CO2 incubator. Endothelial cells (1x105 cells) were seeded into 25T flask for 5 days, AgNP or AgMP-treated RBCs were washed once and resuspended in EBM-2 to a cell concentration of 5x107 cells/mL. After HUVEC was washed twice with EBM-2, AgNP or AgMP-exposed RBCs were layered onto confluent HUVEC monolayer and incubated for 60 min at 37°C. After the incubation, the flask was rinsed 3 times with EBM-2 to remove nonadherent RBCs. The number of adherent RBCs was counted on light microscope. The experiments were performed in triplicate and 25 fields were selected randomly to count RBCs number.
Fluorescence observation of adhered RBCs to HUVECs
Endothelial cells (2 x 104 cells) were seeded into 4-well-chamber for 2 days and stained with calcein green for 20 min. AgNP or AgMP-treated RBCs were washed once and resuspended in EBM-2 to a cell concentration of 5x107 cells/mL. After HUVECs were washed twice with EBM-2, AgNP or AgMP-exposed RBCs were layered onto confluent HUVEC monolayer and incubated for 60 min at 37°C. After the incubation, the chambers were rinsed once with EBM-2 to remove nonadherent RBCs, and glycophorin A-PE were added for staining RBCs. Adhered RBCs to HUVECs were observed using fluorescent microscopy.
In vitro assessment of PS exposure and procoagulant activity in rat RBCs
Male Sprgue-Dawley rats (300-400g) were anesthetized with urethane (1.25 g/kg, i.p.). Briefly, citrated whole blood (3.8% sodium citrate) was withdrawn from abdominal aorta and RBCs were isolated as human RBCs preparation. Isolated RBCs were further incubated with AgNP for 4 h, then PS exposure and procoagulant activity were determined mentioned above.
In vivo experiments
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-400 g) were anesthetized with urethane (1.25 g/kg, i.p.). 2 h after intravascular injection of AgNP (10 or 50 mg/kg), whole blood (3.8% sodium citrate) was collected from abdominal aorta, and PS exposure of RBCs was determined using flow cytometry. Thrombus formation was induced by stasis combined with hypercoagulability. The abdomen was surgically opened, and the vena cava was exposed after careful dissection. Two loose cotton threads were prepared 16 mm apart around the vena cava. All side branches were ligated tightly with cotton threads. 2 h after the intravenous injection of AgNP (10 or 50 mg/kg) into a left femoral vein, 1000-fold diluted thromboplastin was infused for 1 min to induce thrombus formation. Stasis was initiated by tightening the two threads, first the proximal and the distal thereafter. The abdominal cavity was provisionally closed, and blood stasis was maintained for 15 min. After the abdomen was re-opened, the ligated venous segment was excised and opened longitudinally to remove the thrombus. The isolated thrombus was blotted of excess blood and immediately weighed.
Experiments using RBCs from cancer patients
With an approval from the Ethics Committee of Health Service Center at Seoul National University Hospital, human blood was obtained from cancer patient male donors with leukemia and healthy control male donors using a vacutainer with acid citrate dextrose and a 21-gauge needle on the day of each experiment. RBCs preparation, measurement of ROS generation and PS exposure were done as described earlier.
The means and standard errors of means were calculated for all treatment groups. The data were subjected to two-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s multiple range test or student t test to determine which means were significantly different from the control. In all cases, a p value of < .05 was used to determine significant differences.
“This research was supported by a grant (#HI16C2044) of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea.”
Availability of data and materials
YB and KML designed and performed the experiments; KK and TN analyzed the data and performed platelet experiments; IK designed the RBC experiments isolated from cancer patients; ONB performed an additional experiment for the revision; JHC supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
With the approval from the Ethics Committee of Health Service Center at Seoul National University, human blood was obtained from healthy male donors or cancer patients. All the animal protocols used in vivo experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Service Center at Seoul National University.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Wei L, et al. Silver nanoparticles: synthesis, properties, and therapeutic applications. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20(5):595–601.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ong C, et al. Silver nanoparticles in cancer: therapeutic efficacy and toxicity. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20(6):772–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martínez-Gutierrez F, et al. Antibacterial activity, inflammatory response, coagulation and cytotoxicity effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine: NBM. 2012;8(3):328–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braydich-Stolle L, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of nanoparticles in mammalian germline stem cells. Toxicol Sci. 2005;88(2):412–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ivask A, et al. Toxicity mechanisms in Escherichia coli vary for silver nanoparticles and differ from ionic silver. ACS Nano. 2013;8(1):374–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- AshaRani P, et al. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in human cells. ACS Nano. 2008;3(2):279–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ghosh M, et al. In vitro and in vivo genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2012;749(1):60–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tang J, et al. Distribution, translocation and accumulation of silver nanoparticles in rats. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2009;9(8):4924–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nemmar A, et al. Passage of inhaled particles into the blood circulation in humans. Circulation. 2002;105(4):411–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takenaka S, et al. Pulmonary and systemic distribution of inhaled ultrafine silver particles in rats. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(Suppl 4):547.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim MJ, Shin S. Toxic effects of silver nanoparticles and nanowires on erythrocyte rheology. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014;67:80–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jun E-A, et al. Silver nanoparticles enhance thrombus formation through increased platelet aggregation and procoagulant activity. Nanotoxicology. 2011;5(2):157–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Greulich C, et al. Cell type-specific responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to silver nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(9):3505–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee AY, Levine MN. Venous thromboembolism and cancer: risks and outcomes. Circulation. 2003;107(23 suppl 1):I-17-I-21.Google Scholar
- Heit JA, et al. Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(6):809–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lim K-M, et al. Low-level mercury can enhance procoagulant activity of erythrocytes: a new contributing factor for mercury-related thrombotic disease. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(7):928.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shin J-H, et al. Lead-induced procoagulant activation of erythrocytes through phosphatidylserine exposure may lead to thrombotic diseases. Chem Res Toxicol. 2007;20(1):38–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim K, et al. High-dose vitamin C injection to cancer patients may promote thrombosis through procoagulant activation of erythrocytes. Toxicol Sci. 2015;147(2):350–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mohanty JG, Nagababu E, Rifkind JM. Red blood cell oxidative stress impairs oxygen delivery and induces red blood cell aging. Front Physiol. 2014;5.Google Scholar
- Robert F.A. Zwaal and Alan J. Schroit. Pathophysiologic Implications of Membrane Phospholipid Asymmetry in Blood Cells. Blood. 1997;89:1121-32.Google Scholar
- Xia T, et al. Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm. Nano Lett. 2006;6(8):1794–807.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DeJong K, et al. High calcium requirement for phosphatidylserine exposure in sickle cell disease. Blood. 2006;108(11):3788.Google Scholar
- Suzuki J, et al. Calcium-dependent phospholipid scramblase activity of TMEM16 protein family members. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(19):13305–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weiss E, Rees DC, Gibson JS. Role of calcium in phosphatidylserine externalisation in red blood cells from sickle cell patients. Anemia. 2011;2011:379894.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Caine GJ, et al. The hypercoagulable state of malignancy: pathogenesis and current debate. Neoplasia. 2002;4(6):465.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Piatek C, O'connell CL, Liebman HA. Treating venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Expert Rev Hematol. 2012;5(2):201–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lang PA, et al. Stimulation of erythrocyte phosphatidylserine exposure by paclitaxel. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2006;18(1–3):151–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Briglia M, et al. Edelfosine induced suicidal death of human erythrocytes. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;37(6):2221–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levine MN, et al. The thrombogenic effect of anticancer drug therapy in women with stage II breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(7):404–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiu Z-m, et al. Negligible particle-specific antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2012;12(8):4271–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van der Zande M, et al. Distribution, elimination, and toxicity of silver nanoparticles and silver ions in rats after 28-day oral exposure. ACS Nano. 2012;6(8):7427–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asharani P, et al. Investigations on the structural damage in human erythrocytes exposed to silver, gold, and platinum nanoparticles. Adv Funct Mater. 2010;20(8):1233–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen LQ, et al. Nanotoxicity of silver nanoparticles to red blood cells: size dependent adsorption, uptake, and hemolytic activity. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28(3):501–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim YS, et al. Twenty-eight-day oral toxicity, genotoxicity, and gender-related tissue distribution of silver nanoparticles in Sprague-Dawley rats. Inhal Toxicol. 2008;20(6):575–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hong J-S, et al. Combined repeated-dose toxicity study of silver nanoparticles with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test. Nanotoxicology. 2014;8(4):349–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smock KJ, et al. Assessment of orally dosed commercial silver nanoparticles on human ex vivo platelet aggregation. Nanotoxicology. 2014;8(3):328–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Recordati C, et al. Tissue distribution and acute toxicity of silver after single intravenous administration in mice: nano-specific and size-dependent effects. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2015;13(1):12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tiwari DK, Jin T, Behari J. Dose-dependent in-vivo toxicity assessment of silver nanoparticle in Wistar rats. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2011;21(1):13–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park K, et al. Bioavailability and toxicokinetics of citrate-coated silver nanoparticles in rats. Arch Pharm Res. 2011;34(1):153–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Völker C, et al. Toxicity of silver nanoparticles and ionic silver: comparison of adverse effects and potential toxicity mechanisms in the freshwater clam Sphaerium corneum. Nanotoxicology. 2015;9(6):677–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sopjani M, et al. Silver ion-induced suicidal erythrocyte death. J Appl Toxicol. 2009;29(6):531–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Utembe W, et al. Dissolution and biodurability: important parameters needed for risk assessment of nanomaterials. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2015;12(1):11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(7):823.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scherz-Shouval R, Elazar Z. Regulation of autophagy by ROS: physiology and pathology. Trends Biochem Sci. 2011;36(1):30–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fan K, et al. In vivo guiding nitrogen-doped carbon nanozyme for tumor catalytic therapy. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1440.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nel A, et al. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006;311(5761):622–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O'Connor JE, et al. A flow cytometric assay for intracellular nonprotein thiols using mercury orange. Cytometry A. 1988;9(6):529–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar